The Effect of Positioning on Comfort, Stress Levels, and Physiological Functions in Premature Infants
NCT ID: NCT06752005
Last Updated: 2024-12-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
73 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-05
2021-08-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nurses should adjust infants' positions according to their unique physiological conditions rather than relying on a single position, aiming to reduce sequelae associated with prolonged hospitalization and to support the infants' growth and recovery. According to researchers' observations and experience, premature infants positioned in quarter prone or stomach positions show better ventilation, better oxygenation, and fewer episodes of apnea. Due to the varying results in the literature, we recognize the need to validate these observations scientifically. The findings are expected to make a valuable contribution to our clinical practices and scientific knowledge in this field.In light of this information, our study aims to investigate the effects of positioning premature infants receiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit in different positions on their comfort, stress levels, and physiological functions (heart rate, SpO₂, and respiratory rate). It was tested the hypotheses that there Positioning premature infants in different positions (supine, prone, and quarter prone) during non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit does not affect their comfort levels, stress levels and heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO₂), or respiratory rate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group supine, quarter prone, prone
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Intervention Group
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Intervention Group quarter prone, prone, supine
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Intervention Group
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Intervention Group prone, supine, quarter prone
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Intervention Group
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention Group
One of the investigators created a randomization sequence using a simple random numbers table and determined the groups. Another researcher assigned premature infants to the study groups according to the order of hospitalization in the unit, and the same researcher also applied the intervention. Thus, each infant experienced all three positions in a crossover design by the end of the study. Infants in all three groups were positioned for two hours in each posture, totaling six hours by the end of the study. Immediately after positioning in each posture, and at 1, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were recorded from bedside monitors, and respiratory rate was counted over one minute. Comfort and stress scores were assessed immediately after positioning (1 minute) and at 60 and 120 minutes. The Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS) was used to assess comfort, while the Neonatal Stress Scale (NSS) was used to evaluate stress.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Has a clinical, surgical or congenital problem that makes the positions impossible,
* Surgical intervention,
* Intracranial hemorrhage and/or periventricular leukomalacia,
* Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
28 Weeks
36 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
funda güler
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Funda Güler, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Aydin, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Turkey Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Medicine and Health Sciences Research and Applications Hospital, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Aydin, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Interventional Randomize Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id