ICARE-LCS QUERI Partnered Evaluation Initiative: Integrating Comprehensive Tobacco Treatment to Enhance Lung Cancer Screening
NCT ID: NCT06745258
Last Updated: 2025-12-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
7 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-02-01
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Though a robust integration of LCS and TDT is a VA priority, in reality there remains a gap in both reach and intensity of TDT for LCS participants. Guidelines and evidence support TDT processes that include 1) systematic assessment and connection to treatment (e.g. Ask-Advise-Connect, motivational interviewing, optout or proactive strategies) and 2) treatment that includes the evidence-based combination of intensive pharmacologic and behavioral treatments ('combined TDT'). Recent trials in LCS participants found high rates of agreeing to treatment using 'opt-out' motivational referral strategies and the highest cessation rates using a longitudinal "chronic disease" model that delivers combined TDT over a period up to a year. Unfortunately, relatively few Veterans in LCS receive any TDT and the treatment is usually inconsistent with guidelines and this evidence. In a national sample of LCS participants who smoke, only 16.4% received any pharmacotherapy for TDT, many under-dosed with short-acting nicotine replacement alone, and fewer than 1% received the recommended combination of behavioral and pharmacologic treatment. This represents a significant gap in care. Improving quality of TDT for Veterans in LCS has been identified as a priority area by multiple stakeholders including the Office of Oncology and Precision Medicine (OPM), the investigators' operational partner, the VA Lung Precision Oncology Program (LPOP), the White House Prevention and Screening Task Force, the National Committee for Quality Assurance and Veterans engagement groups. Each care process-LCS and TDT-is complex on its own, which has hampered integration. While some LCS processes are standardized across VA through use of the tools provided by the National Center for Lung Cancer Screening (NCLCS), individual LCS programs use varied care models. Programs can be 'centralized' (most LCS-related care is delivered by dedicated program staff) or 'hybrid,' where responsibilities are shared between primary care and LCS staff. NCLCS has worked with VAs across the country to enhance LCS quality and uptake. Individual LCS programs deliver combined TDT variably, and many processes are not adapted for the longitudinal, annual LCS process. The VA Tobacco Use Treatment Program Office (TUT) is currently conducting a pilot funded by the Cancer Moonshot to demonstrate feasibility of integrating TDT into LCS, recently expanded from 11 to 15 sites. The Minneapolis VA has conducted a VISN 23-Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) partnered implementation pilot to understand barriers and needs among diverse LCS programs, identifying many modifiable targets. The VISN 23 QUERI Team and TUT have collaborated to design an LCS-TDT toolkit that will soon be nationally available. While an important step, a toolkit alone may be insufficient to increase uptake of best practices. Tailored implementation support through intensive external facilitation may be necessary to effectively integrate TDT processes within the VA LCS landscape. With support from the operational partner, OPM, this project proposes to work with TUT and the NCLCS to build on existing efforts to increase participation in combined TDT for LCS participants. This project will utilize both retrospective data analysis and prospective data gathering to inform and tailor a toolkit for national dissemination. ICARE-LCS is an implementation evaluation study model.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: Identify key process components of effective tobacco treatment programs in LCS and success factors for providing combined TDT. A mixed methods assessment will be conducted at 10 sites in the TUT Moonshot pilot, first qualitatively assessing their current TDT-LCS processes, success factors and perceived barriers to implementation of combined TDT. Data will then be linked with quantitative data of treatment participation and short-term cessation. Findings will be used to refine the toolkit for use in Aim 2 and nationally.
Aim 2: Test a multicomponent facilitation package to improve integration of TDT and LCS.
Seven programs will be identified from among LPOP sites outside of the TUT pilot, ensuring variation in site characteristics (e.g. hybrid vs centralized model), and provided implementation support using external facilitation. Sites will be matched at least 1:1 to another site in the LPOP network that will receive implementation as usual (controls). The primary outcome will be penetration (participation in combined TDT, secondary outcome any treatment) with additional secondary outcomes of fidelity (ideal TDT), and effectiveness (short-term cessation).
Aim 3: Evaluate the implementation outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and cost of implementing TDT integrated with LCS, assessed among Veterans and care team members.
Implementation outcomes other than cost will be assessed using qualitative methods. Cost will be examined related to the implementation support and to the TDT provided (e.g. LCS staff costs, pharmacotherapy, tobacco-related visits) using staff logs and VA pharmacy and billing data. Collectively, the above program evaluation will inform national cancer prevention efforts and build infrastructure necessary to support broad implementation of high-impact TDT processes in LCS programs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Veterans Participating in Lung Cancer Screening who Smoke
Veterans participating in lung cancer screening who smoke and are receiving care at participating VA medical centers
No interventions assigned to this group
Participating VA Medical Centers
Seven sites that have agreed to participate in implementation intervention
External Facilitation
Multi-component facilitation strategy to address identified implementation needs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
External Facilitation
Multi-component facilitation strategy to address identified implementation needs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Oncology and Precision Medicine
UNKNOWN
VA Tobacco Use Treatment National Program Office
UNKNOWN
VA National Center for Lung Cancer Screening
UNKNOWN
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anne C. Melzer, MD MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEX 24-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id