Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE4
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2025-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The MOAA/S scale was applied as follows:
Score 5: Alert; responds readily to name spoken in a normal tone. Score 4: Mild sedation; lethargic response to name spoken in a normal tone. Score 3: Moderate sedation; responds only after the name is spoken loudly and/or repeatedly.
Score 2: Deep sedation; responds only after mild prodding or shaking. Score 1: Very deep sedation; unresponsive to physical stimulation. The target sedation level for patients was maintained between 2 and 3, depending on the procedural requirements. If necessary, the drug dose was carefully adjusted to increase or decrease sedation while ensuring the depth of sedation did not drop to level 1.
EEG recordings for all patients were performed. Electrodes were placed on the scalp according to the International 10-20 system, with 19 electrodes and 1 reference electrode, and the impedance of each electrode was maintained below 5 kilo-ohms. EEG recordings began with a 5-minute baseline recording during wakefulness, followed by continuous monitoring during the induction phase (administration of sedative drugs), and an additional 10-minute recording after sedation was achieved. Upon completion of the procedural intervention, EEG recordings were repeated for 10 minutes during the awakening phase and calm wakefulness.
After data collection, all EEG recordings were visually analyzed by a clinical neurophysiologist blinded to the administered drugs. EEG signals were evaluated using filters set between 0.5-70 Hz and a bipolar montage (double banana). Large-amplitude waves (\>100 μV) were considered artifacts, and artifacts caused by eyelid or ocular movements were excluded from the analysis.
The recordings were analyzed for basic EEG activity, including alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (13-25 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), delta (0.5-3.5 Hz), and gamma (25-40 Hz) rhythms, suppression-burst patterns, and their topographies. The presence of interictal epileptiform discharges, such as focal and/or generalized spike-wave, sharp wave, spike-slow wave, sharp-slow wave, and multiple spike-slow wave patterns, was noted. Additionally, clinical and/or subclinical ictal activity was documented.
Demographic data, including age, sex, comorbidities, and body weight, as well as vital parameters recorded before and during the procedure, EEG findings, and adverse effects following IV treatment, were systematically recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SCREENING
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ketamine group
The Ketamine group received IV ketamine at a dosage of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg.
Ketamine
The Ketamine group received IV ketamine at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.
Midazolam group
The Midazolam group received IV midazolam at a dosage of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg.
Midazolam
The Midazolam group received IV midazolam at a titrated dose of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.
Propofol group
The Propofol group received IV propofol at a dosage of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg.
Propofol
The Propofol group received IV propofol at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketamine
The Ketamine group received IV ketamine at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.
Midazolam
The Midazolam group received IV midazolam at a titrated dose of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.
Propofol
The Propofol group received IV propofol at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant or breastfeeding females,
* patients with a known history of epilepsy, previous status epilepticus, or neurological conditions such as head trauma, brain tumors, cerebrovascular events, meningitis, or encephalitis, as well as congenital or acquired structural brain anomalies.
* Individuals with a first-degree family history of epilepsy or who had used medications affecting the central nervous system (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, sedatives, benzodiazepines, or opioids) within the previous month were also excluded.
* Patients were also excluded if they had a known allergy or hypersensitivity to the study drugs (IV ketamine, IV midazolam, IV propofol) or to adjunctive medications used for procedural sedation (e.g., IV fentanyl).
* Patients with a history of complications during anesthesia or previous surgical procedures, such as malignant hyperthermia or respiratory failure.
* Patients with significant movement disorders, agitation, scalp lesions, or other conditions interfering with EEG recording.
* Patients with severe cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled hypertension, advanced heart failure, or arrhythmias, as well as those with oxygen saturation \<90%, a high risk of respiratory depression, or severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
* Patients with severe hepatic or renal failure, or those who had undergone major surgery within the previous 6 months.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adem Az
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Az A, Dogan Y. Unexpected consequences: A case of ketamine-induced seizure in procedural sedation. Turk J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 1;24(4):259-261. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_67_24. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
Kim JH, Lee CK, Yu SH, Min BD, Chung CE, Kim DC. Ketamine-induced generalized convulsive seizure during procedural sedation. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2021 Apr;22(2):119-121. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2021.00094. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Shehata IM, Kohaf NA, ElSayed MW, Latifi K, Aboutaleb AM, Kaye AD. Ketamine: Pro or antiepileptic agent? A systematic review. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 10;10(2):e24433. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24433. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
Besha A, Adamu Y, Mulugeta H, Zemedkun A, Destaw B. Evidence-based guideline on management of status epilepticus in adult intensive care unit in resource-limited settings: a review article. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 17;85(6):2714-2720. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000625. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808.
Zanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, Riggs LM, Highland JN, Georgiou P, Pereira EFR, Albuquerque EX, Thomas CJ, Zarate CA Jr, Gould TD. Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev. 2018 Jul;70(3):621-660. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.015198.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
35-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id