Pro-Epileptic Effects of IV Ketamine

NCT ID: NCT06741930

Last Updated: 2024-12-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators evaluated the safety and potential pro-epileptic effects of intravenous (IV) ketamine during procedural sedation in comparison with IV midazolam and IV propofol. Specifically, the study hypothesizes that IV ketamine, at doses used for procedural sedation, exhibits pro-convulsive properties, lowers the epileptic seizure threshold, and may induce interictal epileptiform discharges and/or seizures. Additionally, the investigators assessed the effects of these sedative agents on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity during procedural sedation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the first group received IV ketamine at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg, the second group received IV midazolam at a titrated dose of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg, and the third group received IV propofol at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Procedural sedation in all groups was supplemented with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia. Baseline EEG recordings were obtained for all patients prior to the procedure. During the procedure, EEG recordings, vital parameters-including blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate-and the depth of sedation were continuously monitored for all participants. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) Scale was used to evaluate the depth of sedation.

The MOAA/S scale was applied as follows:

Score 5: Alert; responds readily to name spoken in a normal tone. Score 4: Mild sedation; lethargic response to name spoken in a normal tone. Score 3: Moderate sedation; responds only after the name is spoken loudly and/or repeatedly.

Score 2: Deep sedation; responds only after mild prodding or shaking. Score 1: Very deep sedation; unresponsive to physical stimulation. The target sedation level for patients was maintained between 2 and 3, depending on the procedural requirements. If necessary, the drug dose was carefully adjusted to increase or decrease sedation while ensuring the depth of sedation did not drop to level 1.

EEG recordings for all patients were performed. Electrodes were placed on the scalp according to the International 10-20 system, with 19 electrodes and 1 reference electrode, and the impedance of each electrode was maintained below 5 kilo-ohms. EEG recordings began with a 5-minute baseline recording during wakefulness, followed by continuous monitoring during the induction phase (administration of sedative drugs), and an additional 10-minute recording after sedation was achieved. Upon completion of the procedural intervention, EEG recordings were repeated for 10 minutes during the awakening phase and calm wakefulness.

After data collection, all EEG recordings were visually analyzed by a clinical neurophysiologist blinded to the administered drugs. EEG signals were evaluated using filters set between 0.5-70 Hz and a bipolar montage (double banana). Large-amplitude waves (\>100 μV) were considered artifacts, and artifacts caused by eyelid or ocular movements were excluded from the analysis.

The recordings were analyzed for basic EEG activity, including alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (13-25 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), delta (0.5-3.5 Hz), and gamma (25-40 Hz) rhythms, suppression-burst patterns, and their topographies. The presence of interictal epileptiform discharges, such as focal and/or generalized spike-wave, sharp wave, spike-slow wave, sharp-slow wave, and multiple spike-slow wave patterns, was noted. Additionally, clinical and/or subclinical ictal activity was documented.

Demographic data, including age, sex, comorbidities, and body weight, as well as vital parameters recorded before and during the procedure, EEG findings, and adverse effects following IV treatment, were systematically recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epilepsy Seizure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

ketamine midazolam propofol epilepsy Procedural Sedation Pro-Convulsive Effects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Single center
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
In this double-blind study, participants were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups (Ketamine, Midazolam, or Propofol) using a sealed envelope randomization. Both the physicians who assessed the results and the patients were blinded to the assigned group. Each participant was assigned an identification number indicating the treatment group. An emergency nurse prepared the treatment solutions immediately before administration, based on the assigned identification number, and stored them in labeled containers with no indication of their contents. A clinician with 32 years of experience, who was blinded to the study's null hypothesis and did not participate in the evaluation of results, administered the treatments and recorded patient data onto a predesigned case data form. Another physician with 27 years of experience, who was not present during the treatment, assessed the EEG recordings.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ketamine group

The Ketamine group received IV ketamine at a dosage of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

The Ketamine group received IV ketamine at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.

Midazolam group

The Midazolam group received IV midazolam at a dosage of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

The Midazolam group received IV midazolam at a titrated dose of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.

Propofol group

The Propofol group received IV propofol at a dosage of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

The Propofol group received IV propofol at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketamine

The Ketamine group received IV ketamine at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam

The Midazolam group received IV midazolam at a titrated dose of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

The Propofol group received IV propofol at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Adults aged ≥18 years scheduled to undergo procedural sedation prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the endoscopy unit were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients aged \<18 years,
* pregnant or breastfeeding females,
* patients with a known history of epilepsy, previous status epilepticus, or neurological conditions such as head trauma, brain tumors, cerebrovascular events, meningitis, or encephalitis, as well as congenital or acquired structural brain anomalies.
* Individuals with a first-degree family history of epilepsy or who had used medications affecting the central nervous system (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, sedatives, benzodiazepines, or opioids) within the previous month were also excluded.
* Patients were also excluded if they had a known allergy or hypersensitivity to the study drugs (IV ketamine, IV midazolam, IV propofol) or to adjunctive medications used for procedural sedation (e.g., IV fentanyl).
* Patients with a history of complications during anesthesia or previous surgical procedures, such as malignant hyperthermia or respiratory failure.
* Patients with significant movement disorders, agitation, scalp lesions, or other conditions interfering with EEG recording.
* Patients with severe cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled hypertension, advanced heart failure, or arrhythmias, as well as those with oxygen saturation \<90%, a high risk of respiratory depression, or severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
* Patients with severe hepatic or renal failure, or those who had undergone major surgery within the previous 6 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Haseki Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adem Az

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Az A, Dogan Y. Unexpected consequences: A case of ketamine-induced seizure in procedural sedation. Turk J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 1;24(4):259-261. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_67_24. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39564442 (View on PubMed)

Kim JH, Lee CK, Yu SH, Min BD, Chung CE, Kim DC. Ketamine-induced generalized convulsive seizure during procedural sedation. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2021 Apr;22(2):119-121. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2021.00094. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33957739 (View on PubMed)

Shehata IM, Kohaf NA, ElSayed MW, Latifi K, Aboutaleb AM, Kaye AD. Ketamine: Pro or antiepileptic agent? A systematic review. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 10;10(2):e24433. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24433. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38293492 (View on PubMed)

Besha A, Adamu Y, Mulugeta H, Zemedkun A, Destaw B. Evidence-based guideline on management of status epilepticus in adult intensive care unit in resource-limited settings: a review article. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 17;85(6):2714-2720. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000625. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37363462 (View on PubMed)

Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29870458 (View on PubMed)

Zanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, Riggs LM, Highland JN, Georgiou P, Pereira EFR, Albuquerque EX, Thomas CJ, Zarate CA Jr, Gould TD. Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev. 2018 Jul;70(3):621-660. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.015198.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29945898 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

35-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id