Conventional TEVAR Versus FABULOUS RCT

NCT ID: NCT06740565

Last Updated: 2024-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

392 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-01

Study Completion Date

2029-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For High-risk Type B aortic dissections, a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study is conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of conventional proximal endovascular repair (TEVAR) alone versus the Fabulous system which includes a proximal stent graft with a distal bare metal stent implanted. The study aims to determine the optimal intervention method for such population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aortic dissection is characterized by its sudden onset, rapid progression, and life-threatening nature, with a natural mortality rate of 25% within 24 hours and 50% within 48 hours. As China's socioeconomic development accelerates and the population continues to age, the incidence of aortic dissection has been rising year by year. According to the China Cardiovascular Health and Disease Report 2022, cardiovascular diseases are now the leading cause of death among urban and rural residents in China. It is estimated that 245 million people in China suffer from hypertension, a major risk factor for aortic dissection. The Sino-RAD study on aortic dissection indicates that, compared to Western countries, China exhibits a "high incidence, early onset" trend, which is related to poor hypertension control. The average age of Chinese aortic dissection patients is 51.8 years, about 10 years younger than in Western countries, which significantly affects life expectancy and imposes a heavy economic burden on healthcare.

Type B aortic dissection refers to dissections originating from the left subclavian artery and beyond. Since 1999, when thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was first introduced internationally, there has been a revolutionary shift in the surgical treatment of B-type aortic dissection, transitioning from highly invasive open surgeries to minimally invasive endovascular treatments. This shift has greatly reduced perioperative mortality and complications. China's treatment of Type B aortic dissection has kept pace with international advancements. Data from the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases Quality Control shows that from 2017 to 2022, the number of TEVAR surgeries in China increased from 13,709 per year to 24,076 per year, a growth of 75.6%. The number of hospitals performing TEVAR surgeries also increased from 627 to 1,050. However, with the increase in cases, clinical challenges have also emerged.

Type B aortic dissection patients exhibit both common and individual characteristics. Currently, for acute Type B dissections, regardless of subtype, most patients undergo proximal endovascular repair during the subacute phase, while a "watch and wait" strategy is adopted for dissections distal to the descending aorta. This single treatment approach carries potential risks, including inappropriate indications, mistimed interventions, and uncertain prognoses.

Our team has already established a database and imaging library with nearly ten thousand cases. Building on the study of acute complex, non-complex, penetrating ulcers, and intramural hematomas, we are delving deeper into acute high-risk subtypes and localized contrast enhancement of the aortic wall for more refined classifications. For patients with different classifications and at various stages of dissection, such as hyperacute, acute, and subacute phases, it is critical to develop individualized treatment strategies. These strategies may include optimal medical treatment, proximal endovascular repair alone, or a combination of proximal repair and distal petticoat techniques.

Therefore, large-scale clinical research is urgently needed to identify the best intervention timing and methods, based on refined classifications, to establish personalized, stratified diagnosis and treatment strategies for different patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type B Aortic Dissection

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

endovascular repair distal bare stent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

c-TEVAR

conventional thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

stent-graft implanted to seal the proximal entry tear of type B aortic dissection

Fabulous

proximal stent graft combined with distal bare stent

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

stent-graft implanted to seal the proximal entry tear of type B aortic dissection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

thoracic endovascular aortic repair

stent-graft implanted to seal the proximal entry tear of type B aortic dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males aged 18 years or older, or non-pregnant females

* Diagnosed with high-risk Type B aortic dissection with a narrow true lumen (defined as the minimum true lumen diameter being less than 30% of the total vessel diameter) and/or poor radiographic or clinical visceral perfusion (including abnormal blood supply to the liver, kidneys, mesentery, or lower limb ischemia)
* Deemed suitable for endovascular treatment according to the investigator's judgment
* Able to understand the purpose of the trial, willing to participate voluntarily and sign the informed consent form, and committed to follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Subjects with hemodynamic instability or ruptured aortic dissection

* Subjects who, due to various anatomical factors, are unable to undergo TEVAR alone
* Subjects with connective tissue diseases, such as Marfan syndrome
* Subjects in poor general condition, unable to tolerate general anesthesia
* Subjects allergic to contrast agents, nitinol stent materials, or other stent components
* Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
* Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the past 3 months
* Subjects with a history of TIA or cerebral infarction within the past 3 months
* Subjects with creatinine levels exceeding 2.5 times the upper normal limit or those currently on dialysis
* Subjects with severe conditions such as liver failure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lixin Wang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yuanqing Kan, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0086-13585939248

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TBAD202412

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id