Glycoprotein Matrix-Bound Iron Improves Iron Absorption

NCT ID: NCT06738199

Last Updated: 2024-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A double-blind, randomized crossover study was conducted that evaluated absorption kinetics of 3 forms of dietary supplement iron by measuring iron levels in the blood after acute ingestion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The biotransformation of minerals through glycosylation by microorganisms, such as yeast or probiotics, can produce nutrients bound to a food matrix, potentially enhancing their bioavailability. This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF). Methods: In a double-blind, crossover design, 17 participants ingested 11 mg of iron in one of three forms: GPM (Pharmachem Innovation, Kearny, NJ, USA), FBC (FerrochelĀ®, Balchem Corp., Montvale, NJ, USA), or FF (FerroPharma Chemicals Ltd, Hungary). Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, 240-, 300-, 360-, 420-, and 480-minutes post-ingestion. Water intake was standardized throughout the protocol, and an iron-free snack was provided at 4 hours post-ingestion. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, with key outcome variables including the area under the concentration vs. time curve (iAUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), and time to maximum concentration (Tmax). The a priori significance level was set at p \< 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Evaluation of Bioavailability of Supplemental Forms of Iron

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Bioavailability iron absorption postbiotic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
lab staff that did the analysis and lead author that performed statistical analyses

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

glycoprotein matrix iron

Acute glycoprotein matrix iron was ingested to assess blood appearance levels from pre and at 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, 240-, 300-, 360-, 420-, and 480-minutes post-ingestion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dietary iron supplementation

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF).

ferrous bisglycinate chelate iron

Acute ferrous bisglycinate chelate iron was ingested to assess blood appearance levels from pre and at 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, 240-, 300-, 360-, 420-, and 480-minutes post-ingestion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dietary iron supplementation

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF).

ferrous fumarate iron

Acute ferrous fumarate iron was ingested to assess blood appearance levels from pre and at 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, 240-, 300-, 360-, 420-, and 480-minutes post-ingestion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dietary iron supplementation

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dietary iron supplementation

This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF).

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants had to have a normal body weight \[body mass index (BMI) of 19-24.99 kg/m2\] and engage in recreational physical activity, as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines.
* Participants must be healthy and have no diagnosed chronic disease conditions

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants were not allowed to consume any nutritional supplements known to affect the measures of the current study for at least 6 weeks prior to participation, including pro-, post- and prebiotics, as well as digestive enzymes.
* Individuals who were currently being treated for or diagnosed with a gastrointestinal, cardiac, respiratory, circulatory, musculoskeletal, metabolic, immune, autoimmune, psychiatric, hematological, neurological, or endocrinological disorder.
* Participants whose body mass had deviated by more than 2% in the previous 30 days
* Participants who were unwilling to abstain from alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine for 12 hours prior to each visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pharmachem Innovations

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lemuel W. Taylor IV

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Human Performance Lab

Belton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GPMiron

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id