Tranexamic Acid in Patients With Traumatic Bleeding Based on Dynamic Monitoring of Thromboelastography

NCT ID: NCT06736860

Last Updated: 2024-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

580 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trauma is an important global public health problem and is the leading cause of death in people under 40 years old. Studies have shown that early prehospital administration of TXA 1 g intravenously followed by a continuous infusion of 1 g tranexamic acid (TXA) over 8 hours ( 1+1 regimen) is effective in reducing mortality in trauma patients, but there is a residual risk of death. This clinical study utilized real-time dynamic monitoring of coagulation fibrinolytic status in trauma patients using thromboelastography (TEG) to assess the need for a second or even multiple administrations of TXA (1+X regimen) in addition to the administration of 1 g of TXA intravenously and to compare the two mortality rates, thus guiding the early and precise use of TXA in trauma patients to potentially reduce mortality in trauma patients while decreasing thromboembolic risk. The present study is an optimization and addition to the TXA 1+1 regimen. Currently, no relevant studies have been reported. This study has important clinical significance for standardizing the early and precise use of TXA in trauma patients and improving the effectiveness and safety of TXA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trauma, an important global public health problem, is the leading cause of death in people under 40 years of age. Post-traumatic hemorrhage deaths account for approximately half of the 4.6 million injury deaths worldwide each year . Their early deaths are due to severe hemorrhage and later to traumatic brain injury or secondary multi-organ dysfunction. Although resuscitation protocols for post-traumatic hemorrhage have improved over the past decade, shifting from massive rehydration aimed at perfusion to "damage control resuscitation" that prioritizes correction of early coagulation abnormalities, current transfusion therapies are still unable to correct coagulation during sustained bleeding. In recent years, the hemostatic drug therapy represented by Tranexamic Acid (TXA) has incorporated antifibrinolytic drugs into the global trauma practice guidelines . Overseas studies have shown that the use of TXA within 3 h after trauma can reduce the mortality rate due to trauma bleeding \[5,6\], but domestic clinical studies in this area are less reported, which is worthy of in-depth study.

The use of TEG for real-time dynamic monitoring of coagulation and fibrinolytic status in trauma patients to guide the early and precise application of TXA may be effective in reducing the mortality rate of severely traumatized patients, as well as reducing the occurrence of thromboembolism. Since the half-life of tranexamic acid is 1.8h , the present study is to use TEG to monitor the coagulation fibrinolytic status of traumatized patients in real time, and to assess the need for secondary or even multiple administrations of TXA (up to three times) (i.e., the 1+X regimen) after two half-life periods of TXA are about to be metabolized on the basis of the intravenous injection of 1g of TXA and to compare the two mortality rates, so that the early and precise use of TXA in traumatized patients can be guided, which may be effective in reducing the occurrence of thromboembolism. patients to guide the early and precise use of TXA in trauma patients, potentially reducing mortality in trauma patients while reducing the risk of thromboembolism. The present study is an optimization and addition to the TXA 1+1 regimen. Currently, there are no relevant literature reports and no references in relevant clinical trial registry websites. This study is clinically important for standardizing the early and precise use of TXA in trauma patients and improving the effectiveness and safety of TXA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trauma Coagulopathy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Trauma Coagulopathy tranexamic acid Thromboelastography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1+1 control group

Early prehospital administration of TXA 1 g intravenously followed by a continuous infusion of 1 g tranexamic acid (TXA) over 8 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tranexamic acid (TXA) injection

Intervention Type DRUG

All enrolled patients with acute trauma were given 1 g tranexamic acid (TXA) within 3 h after trauma, which was infused intravenously within 10 min, and randomized into groups. After admission, the first laboratory examination was conducted for both groups. The 1+1 control group continued to infuse 1g TXA within 8 h.

1+X the case group

Early prehospital administration of TXA 1 g , then using thromboelastography (TEG) to assess the need for a second or even multiple administrations of TXA ( 1+X regimen) in addition to the administration of 1 g of TXA intravenously

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tranexamic acid (TXA) injection

Intervention Type DRUG

All enrolled patients with acute trauma were given 1 g tranexamic acid (TXA) within 3 h after trauma, which was infused intravenously within 10 min, and randomized into groups. After admission, the first laboratory examination was conducted for both groups. the 1+x study group was subjected to thromboelastography (TEG) without TXA for the time being, and the coagulation and fibrinolytic status of the patients was judged according to the results of TEG (LY30, EPL value), and the patients diagnosed with hyperfibrinolysis continued to be infused with 1g TXA, and the patients diagnosed with normal or reduced fibrinolysis were not infused with TXA. TEG was rechecked after 4 h, and the decision of whether to use TXA was based on the TEG results.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) injection

All enrolled patients with acute trauma were given 1 g tranexamic acid (TXA) within 3 h after trauma, which was infused intravenously within 10 min, and randomized into groups. After admission, the first laboratory examination was conducted for both groups. The 1+1 control group continued to infuse 1g TXA within 8 h.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tranexamic acid (TXA) injection

All enrolled patients with acute trauma were given 1 g tranexamic acid (TXA) within 3 h after trauma, which was infused intravenously within 10 min, and randomized into groups. After admission, the first laboratory examination was conducted for both groups. the 1+x study group was subjected to thromboelastography (TEG) without TXA for the time being, and the coagulation and fibrinolytic status of the patients was judged according to the results of TEG (LY30, EPL value), and the patients diagnosed with hyperfibrinolysis continued to be infused with 1g TXA, and the patients diagnosed with normal or reduced fibrinolysis were not infused with TXA. TEG was rechecked after 4 h, and the decision of whether to use TXA was based on the TEG results.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. . trauma patients 18 -80 years of age (50 points \> trauma ISS score \> 16);
2. . hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg) and/or tachycardia (heart rate ≥ 110 beats/min);
3. . receiving a 1 g TXA push within 3 h of the injury, with the push completed within 10 min of arrival at the hospital.
4. . signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

1. .Coagulation abnormalities due to co-morbid hematologic or autoimmune diseases
2. Inability to establish venous or intraosseous access
3. Pregnant women
4. Traumatic cardiac arrest for more than 5 minutes
5. Failure of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
6. Penetrating brain injury
7. Drowning or hanging -
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xu Li, doctor

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +86 18680248866

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xu Li Doctor Li, phD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NFEC-2024-615

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id