Erector Spinae Plane Block v.s Patient Controlled Analgesia in Correction Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis

NCT ID: NCT06728046

Last Updated: 2024-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Scoliosis correction surgery involves extensive surgical wounds, intense intraoperative stimulation, and severe postoperative pain, often necessitating the use of potent opioids. However, there is a critical clinical need for effective pain management strategies that both ensure sufficient analgesia and minimize opioid-related adverse effects. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has shown promise as an effective analgesic technique, but its application in scoliosis correction surgery has not been reported.We hypothesize that ESPB provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) pumps. Specifically, ESPB is expected to significantly reduce postoperative pain scores, decrease perioperative opioid consumption, and mitigate opioid-related side effects.

This study is a randomized controlled trial involving 40 participants undergoing scoliosis correction surgery, randomized into two groups: the ESPB group and the PCA group. The primary outcome measure is the resting pain score at 2 hours postoperatively, which will be used to evaluate the efficacy of ESPB. Secondary outcomes include perioperative opioid consumption and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. The study aims to provide evidence for ESPB as an innovative and effective method for postoperative analgesia in scoliosis correction surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Scoliosis correction surgery involves large surgical wounds spanning multiple vertebrae, requiring sufficient analgesia to manage intense intraoperative stimulation and severe postoperative pain. Effective pain control in this context often necessitates potent opioids, such as morphine or equivalent drugs. Current perioperative analgesia strategies include intraoperative use of long-acting opioids (e.g., sufentanil, fentanyl) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps for postoperative pain management, primarily involving opioids like sufentanil or morphine. However, opioids are associated with adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, bowel obstruction, pruritus, dizziness, respiratory depression, opioid tolerance, and hyperalgesia, which can lead to suboptimal pain control and negatively impact patients' quality of life and postoperative recovery. There is a critical need for effective analgesic methods in scoliosis correction surgery that minimize opioid-related adverse effects, enhance the patient experience, and promote accelerated recovery.

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) was first reported by Forero et al. in 2016 as an effective analgesic technique for rib-related neuropathic pain. Its mechanism involves the injection of local anesthetics into the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process, allowing for the diffusion of the anesthetic to adjacent areas. ESPB exerts its primary analgesic effect through the posterior branches of spinal nerves and can further diffuse anteriorly to paravertebral and epidural spaces, and laterally across the costotransverse foramina, affecting nerve roots and visceral structures. This mechanism provides comprehensive analgesia. ESPB has since been widely applied in perioperative pain management for thoracic surgery, shoulder arthroscopy, breast surgery, abdominal surgery, cesarean sections, and urological procedures, as well as for acute and chronic pain conditions such as rib fractures, postherpetic neuralgia, burns, and cancer pain.

Studies have demonstrated that ESPB effectively reduces postoperative pain scores, decreases opioid consumption, delays the need for rescue analgesics, reduces the number of patients requiring rescue medication, and lowers the incidence of nausea and vomiting in spinal surgeries. Although there are limited case reports and clinical experience summarizing its perioperative analgesic effect in scoliosis correction surgery, preliminary findings suggest it is effective.

Based on the analgesic mechanism of ESPB and prior studies, we hypothesize that ESPB provides superior postoperative pain control compared to PCA, significantly reducing postoperative pain scores, perioperative opioid consumption, and associated adverse effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Idiopathic Scoliosis Erector Spinae Plane Block Patient Controlled Analgesia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Patient Controlled Analgesia Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Due to differences in clinical management between the groups, investigators, participants, and clinical staff will be aware of group assignments. However, follow-up researchers and statisticians responsible for data analysis will remain blinded to the group assignments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESPB Group

Participants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ESPB

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.

PCA Group

Participants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PCA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ESPB

Participants will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively, using 40 ml of 0.3% ropivacaine.

Intervention Type OTHER

PCA

Participants will receive postoperative PCA with a formulation of 200 µg sufentanil diluted to 100 ml. The PCA settings will include a background dose of 3 ml/hour, a lockout time of 15 minutes, and a bolus dose of 2 ml.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 14 years or older, regardless of gender.
* Scheduled for scoliosis correction surgery.
* Signed informed consent from the participant or their legal guardian.

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to local anesthetics such as ropivacaine.
* Family history of malignant hyperthermia.
* Severe systemic diseases affecting the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys.
* Neurological or psychiatric disorders.
* Communication difficulties, such as hearing impairment or speech disorders.
* Concurrent participation in other clinical studies.
* Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigators.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West China Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ren Liao

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ren Liao, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

West China Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ren Liao, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +86-18980602177

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WCH20241202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id