The Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on Dickkoff-1 and Secreted Frizzled Related Protein-5 Levels

NCT ID: NCT06727929

Last Updated: 2024-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

99 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Periodontitis is a condition that is defined by microbial-associated, host-induced inflammation, which ultimately results in the loss of periodontal attachment.Periodontal clinical parameters are the most reliable indicators of periodontal disease; however, they provide information about past tissue destruction and are insufficient for predicting future periodontal disease activity. Therefore, evaluation of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) and secreted Frizzled related protein 5 (sFRP5), which are Wnt signaling pathway antagonists, in periodontal inflammation may be a focus of interest. A total of 99 individuals, 44 male and 55 female, participated in our study and were divided into three groups as periodontally healthy, gingivitis and periodontitis. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was applied to the disease groups. Dkk-1 and sFRP5 were evaluated in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) at the baseline and after periodontal treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The participants were divided into three groups in accordance with their periodontal status according to the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal diseases : Periodontally healthy (group H, n = 33, probing depth (PD) ≤3 mm, fullmouth bleeding scores; bleeding on probing (BOP) % \<10, no clinical attachment levels (CAL) and radiologic bone loss), gingivitis (group G, n = 33 PD ≤3 mm, % BOP \>30, no CAL(due to periodontal disease) and radiologic bone loss), Stage 3 Grade B periodontitis (group P, n = 33, These individuals had a minimum of two non-adjacent teeth with sites with PD ≥6 mm, CAL ≥5 mm, BOP ≥30%, tooth loss due to periodontitis ≤4 teeth, the alveolar bone loss at radiographs extending to middle or apical third of the root, the presence of consistent amounts of plaque biofilm/calculus deposits commensurate with the severity of periodontal tissue breakdown, the proportion of percentage bone loss to age values were between 0.25 and 1). Panoromic and periapical radiographic examination was also performed for the diagnosis of periodontitis.

Periodontal status of each individual included in the study was determined by measuring plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), PD, clinical attachment level (CAL) and bleeding of probing (BOP). PD and CAL were measured on six sites (mesio-buccal/ facial, mid-buccal/facial, disto-buccal/facial, mesio-lingual/palatinal, mid-lingual/palatinal, disto-lingual/palatinal) of the teeth in baseline and after periodontal treatment. Bleeding was observed up to 10 sec after the examination of probing depth and BOP score was calculated as the number of BOP-positive sites was divided the number of total sites, after multiplied with 100. Panoramic and periapical radiographs were used to determine the alveolar bone loss. All clinical measurements were recorded using a standard Williams periodontal probe.

Within 2 weeks from the screening visit, phase 1 periodontal treatment/scaling and root planing under local anesthesia using manual instruments and ultrasonic devices in a single appointment were performed and oral hygiene instructions were given to all participants with periodontitis by a single calibrated periodontist. In gingivitis and periodontally healthy groups, phase 1 periodontal treatment and oral hygiene education were given to each one. All periodontal clinical measurements recorded and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples collection were at baseline and the 6-8 th week after the periodontal treatment in patients with G and P group and at one time point (baseline) in H group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periodontal Inflammation Alveolar Bone Loss Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Dickkopf-1 secreted Frizzled Related Protein 5 Gingival crevicular fluid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Periodontally Healthy

PD ≤3 mm, fullmouth bleeding scores (BOP) % \<10, no CAL and radiologic bone loss

Collection of gingival crevicular fluid, ELISA

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF samples were collected at baseline and at the 6-8 -week follow-up appointment after non-surgical periodontal treatment . After removing the supragingival plaque from the interproximal surfaces with sterile curettes, these sample surfaces were isolated with cotton rolls and slightly air-dried to avoid contamination. Standardized paper strips were inserted 1 to 2 mm into the gingival sulcus and held for 30 seconds to collect GCF. Strips contaminated with blood or saliva were discarded and not evaluated. The paper strips were transferred to a precalibrated Periotron 8000 device to measure the fluid volume. Paper strips were placed in sterile Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80C, until laboratory analysis. The level of GCF Dkk-1 and sFRP5 levels was measured by ELISA using commercial kits.

Gingivitis

PD ≤3 mm, % BOP \>30, no CAL(due to periodontal disease) and radiologic bone loss

Collection of gingival crevicular fluid, ELISA

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF samples were collected at baseline and at the 6-8 -week follow-up appointment after non-surgical periodontal treatment . After removing the supragingival plaque from the interproximal surfaces with sterile curettes, these sample surfaces were isolated with cotton rolls and slightly air-dried to avoid contamination. Standardized paper strips were inserted 1 to 2 mm into the gingival sulcus and held for 30 seconds to collect GCF. Strips contaminated with blood or saliva were discarded and not evaluated. The paper strips were transferred to a precalibrated Periotron 8000 device to measure the fluid volume. Paper strips were placed in sterile Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80C, until laboratory analysis. The level of GCF Dkk-1 and sFRP5 levels was measured by ELISA using commercial kits.

Periodontitis

These individuals had a minimum of two non-adjacent teeth with sites with PD ≥6 mm, CAL ≥5 mm, BOP ≥30%, tooth loss due to periodontitis ≤4 teeth, the alveolar bone loss at radiographs extending to middle or apical third of the root, the presence of consistent amounts of plaque biofilm/calculus deposits commensurate with the severity of periodontal tissue breakdown, the proportion of percentage bone loss to age values were between 0.25 and 1

Collection of gingival crevicular fluid, ELISA

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GCF samples were collected at baseline and at the 6-8 -week follow-up appointment after non-surgical periodontal treatment . After removing the supragingival plaque from the interproximal surfaces with sterile curettes, these sample surfaces were isolated with cotton rolls and slightly air-dried to avoid contamination. Standardized paper strips were inserted 1 to 2 mm into the gingival sulcus and held for 30 seconds to collect GCF. Strips contaminated with blood or saliva were discarded and not evaluated. The paper strips were transferred to a precalibrated Periotron 8000 device to measure the fluid volume. Paper strips were placed in sterile Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80C, until laboratory analysis. The level of GCF Dkk-1 and sFRP5 levels was measured by ELISA using commercial kits.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Collection of gingival crevicular fluid, ELISA

GCF samples were collected at baseline and at the 6-8 -week follow-up appointment after non-surgical periodontal treatment . After removing the supragingival plaque from the interproximal surfaces with sterile curettes, these sample surfaces were isolated with cotton rolls and slightly air-dried to avoid contamination. Standardized paper strips were inserted 1 to 2 mm into the gingival sulcus and held for 30 seconds to collect GCF. Strips contaminated with blood or saliva were discarded and not evaluated. The paper strips were transferred to a precalibrated Periotron 8000 device to measure the fluid volume. Paper strips were placed in sterile Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80C, until laboratory analysis. The level of GCF Dkk-1 and sFRP5 levels was measured by ELISA using commercial kits.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being between 20-50 years old
* Meeting the criteria for the working groups

Exclusion Criteria

* having any systemic or metabolic diseases or insturition of effected bone metabolism,
* having bruksizm habits,
* pregnant or lactating,
* received periodontal/peri-implant treatment within the last 6 months,
* the history of antibiotics or antiinflamatuars use regularly within the last 6 months,
* having \< 20 teeth (except for 3rd molars),
* smokers or consumed alcohol.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kırıkkale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cumhuriyet University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sukran Acipinar

Ass.Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Şükran Acıpınar

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cumhuriyet University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id