Myofascial Dysfunction in Post Stroke Shoulder Pain

NCT ID: NCT06718413

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-28

Study Completion Date

2028-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shoulder pain is extremely common after stroke and occurs in 30-70% of patients. The pain may begin as early as one week after stroke, although peak onset and severity occurs around four months, and persists into the chronic stage. Chronic post stroke shoulder pain (PSSP) interferes with motor recovery, decreases quality of life, and contributes to depression. PSSP is thought to be caused mainly by damage to the myofascial tissues around the shoulder joint. Interestingly, an MRI study in patients with PSSP showed that the degree of structural damage to the muscles did not correlate with the degree of pain. Thus, the pathophysiology of myofascial dysfunction and pain in PSSP has not been elucidated leading to missed opportunities for early diagnosis and variable success with pain management.

The accumulation of hyaluronic acid (HA) in muscle and its fascia can cause myofascial dysfunction. HA is a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) consisting of long-chain polymers of disaccharide units of glucuronic acid and N-acetylglucosamine and is a chief constituent of the extracellular matrix of muscle. In physiologic quantities, HA functions as a lubricant and a viscoelastic shock absorber, enabling force transmission during contraction and stretch. Reduced joint mobility and spasticity result in focal accumulation and alteration of HA in muscle. This can lead to the development of stiff areas and taut bands, dysfunctional gliding of deep fascia and muscle layers, reduced range of motion (ROM), and pain. However, the association of muscle HA accumulation with PSSP has not been established.

The investigators have quantified the concentration of HA in muscle using T1rho (T1ρ) MRI and found that T1ρ relaxation time is increased in post stroke shoulder pain and stiffness. Furthermore, dynamic US imaging using shear strain mapping can quantify dysfunctional gliding of muscle that may generate pain during ROM. Myofascial dysfunction can result in non-painful reduction in ROM (latent PSSP), which may become painful due to episodic overuse injury producing greater shear dysfunction (active PSSP). Hence, shear strain mapping may differentiate between latent versus active PSSP. Thus, quantitative Motor Recovery (MR) and US imaging may serve as useful biomarkers to elucidate the pathophysiology of myofascial dysfunction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim 1: Quantify the extent of HA accumulation in shoulder muscles using T1rho MRI before and after treatment with hyaluronidase injections versus placebo in patients with PSSP. Hypothesis: The primary objective will be to demonstrate that dysfunctional shoulder girdle muscles on the paretic side in patients with PSSP will show decreased T1ρ relaxation times in the infraspinatus muscle after treatment with hyaluronidase injections compared with placebo 5-7 weeks post-injection.

Aim 2. Determine maximum sheer strain in shoulder muscles using US shear strain mapping before and after treatment with hyaluronidase injections versus placebo in patients with PSSP. Research Hypothesis: Shear strain on the paretic side in patients with PSSP measured using ultrasound shear mobility between the pectoralis major and minor muscles will decrease after treatment with hyaluronidase injections compared with placebo 5-7 weeks post-injection.

Aim 3. Assess the impact of hyaluronidase injections compared with placebo on shoulder pain, pain free range of motion, upper limb motor impairment, function and quality of life in patients with PSSP. Hypothesis: Hyaluronidase injections compared with placebo in patients with PSSP will lead to (1) reduced pain as assessed using the pain questionnaires and lower pain-pressure thresholds with quantitative sensory testing using an algometer; (2) increased pain free range of motion in most affected shoulder joints; (3) reduced upper limb motor impairment measured using the Fugl-Meyer Scale; (4) increased function measured using the Wolf Motor Function Test; and (5) improved quality of life measured using the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

study because each participant will receive both Human Recombinant Hyaluronidase and the placebo at some point during the study. For example, if the participant is assigned to receive the study drug for the first set of injections, the participant will receive placebo for the second set of injections.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyaluronidase plus saline (Treatment Arm)

hyaluronidase plus saline injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hyaluronidase plus saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of study drug with saline

Saline injection (Control Arm)

normal saline injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

saline

Intervention Type DRUG

injection of normal saline and no study drug

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hyaluronidase plus saline

Injection of study drug with saline

Intervention Type DRUG

saline

injection of normal saline and no study drug

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treatment Arm Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≥18 years;
* hemiparesis from an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke;
* time since cerebral injury 3-180 months prior;
* show a difference of more than 10 degrees of passive ER-ROM between non-paretic and paretic shoulders with or without pain
* ability to give informed consent and HIPAA authorization, and comply with study protocols;

Exclusion Criteria

* treatment of spasticity with Botulinum toxin or intrathecal baclofen within the past three months, phenol injections within the past 12 months, or ongoing adjustment of anti-spastic medications;
* other neurologic condition that may affect motor response (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), MS);
* clinically significant cognitive dysfunction with score \<19 on Folstein's Mini Mental Status Examination or positive depression screening on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9;
* pregnancy;
* known hypersensitivity to hyaluronidase;
* standard contraindications for MRI;
* have non-musculoskeletal PSSP such as only central pain or chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
* any condition that will preclude the patient from completing the protocol as determined by the PI.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ning Cao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ning Cao, MD

Role: CONTACT

718-801-0026

Preeti Raghavan

Role: CONTACT

410-955-0703

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Preeti Raghavan, MD

Role: primary

917-488-9263

Ning Cao, MD

Role: backup

718-801-0026

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4R33AT012279-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB00354872

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TMS and Exercise for Post-stroke Pain
NCT04672044 COMPLETED PHASE1