Nomogram for Predicting In-stent Stenosis After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysm

NCT ID: NCT06715930

Last Updated: 2024-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are the primary cause of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with high morbidity and mortality. Flow diverters, such as pipeline embolization devices (PEDs), are among the most effective methods for treating IAs in recent years due to the maturity of interventional devices and minimally invasive techniques. Unlike conventional stents, PEDs modify the hemodynamics within the parent artery and aneurysm sac, allowing blood flow from the aneurysm sac, thus facilitating endothelialization of the aneurysm neck. As a result, aneurysms are completely removed from circulation with time. However, about 5.1%-38.5% of IA patients develop in-stent stenosis (ISS) even after successful PED implantation. ISS increases the risk of retreatment and ischemic complications, thereby affecting the long-term prognosis of IA patients. Therefore, preoperative determination of the patient's suitability for PED implantation can enhance patient-centered decision-making and improve the long-term prognosis of IA patients.

Although previous studies have evaluated the correlation between certain individual variables and ISS, there are few comprehensive models predicting ISS after PED treatment. Nomograms have been widely used for prediction of tumor survival and cardiovascular events. Nomograms incorporate multiple risk factors for predicting the patient's potential prognosis based on their individual risks. This study aimed to identify the predictors for ISS after PED treatment and to create and verify a nomogram for assessing individual risk.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Aneurysm

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Intracranial aneurysm In-stent stenosis Pipeline embolization device Nomogram

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ISS group

Patients presenting with in-stent stenosis (ISS) at imaging follow-up. ISS was defined as a growth process exceeding the limits of metal mesh, as evidenced by a visible gap between the contrast-filled vascular lumen and the internal contours of the pipeline embolization device.

Interventional treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure was performed via the traditional transfemoral arterial approach, under general anesthesia and complete heparin anticoagulation. PEDs were introduced using Marksman or Phenom-27 microcatheters (Medtronic, Irvine, USA), while coils were introduced via Echelon-10 microcatheters (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). An appropriate working projection was used to generate three-dimensional rotational angiography. Un-subtracted images were used to verify whether PED was completely deployed and attached to the parent artery. Wall apposition was enhanced using balloon angioplasty if post-deployment imaging indicated inadequate apposition. Overlapping devices were used when a single PED was not enough to cover the aneurysm neck and reconstruct blood flow. Neurointerventionalists with more than 15 years of experience conducted all endovascular procedures. The same dual-antiplatelet therapy was used for 6 months post-procedure, followed by aspirin monotherapy for a minimum of 12 months.

Non-ISS group

Patients withou in-stent stenosis (ISS) at imaging follow-up. ISS was defined as a growth process exceeding the limits of metal mesh, as evidenced by a visible gap between the contrast-filled vascular lumen and the internal contours of the pipeline embolization device.

Interventional treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure was performed via the traditional transfemoral arterial approach, under general anesthesia and complete heparin anticoagulation. PEDs were introduced using Marksman or Phenom-27 microcatheters (Medtronic, Irvine, USA), while coils were introduced via Echelon-10 microcatheters (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). An appropriate working projection was used to generate three-dimensional rotational angiography. Un-subtracted images were used to verify whether PED was completely deployed and attached to the parent artery. Wall apposition was enhanced using balloon angioplasty if post-deployment imaging indicated inadequate apposition. Overlapping devices were used when a single PED was not enough to cover the aneurysm neck and reconstruct blood flow. Neurointerventionalists with more than 15 years of experience conducted all endovascular procedures. The same dual-antiplatelet therapy was used for 6 months post-procedure, followed by aspirin monotherapy for a minimum of 12 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interventional treatment

The procedure was performed via the traditional transfemoral arterial approach, under general anesthesia and complete heparin anticoagulation. PEDs were introduced using Marksman or Phenom-27 microcatheters (Medtronic, Irvine, USA), while coils were introduced via Echelon-10 microcatheters (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). An appropriate working projection was used to generate three-dimensional rotational angiography. Un-subtracted images were used to verify whether PED was completely deployed and attached to the parent artery. Wall apposition was enhanced using balloon angioplasty if post-deployment imaging indicated inadequate apposition. Overlapping devices were used when a single PED was not enough to cover the aneurysm neck and reconstruct blood flow. Neurointerventionalists with more than 15 years of experience conducted all endovascular procedures. The same dual-antiplatelet therapy was used for 6 months post-procedure, followed by aspirin monotherapy for a minimum of 12 months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged18 to 75 years;
2. IAs patients treated with PEDs;
3. patients whose parent artery did not have significant atherosclerotic stenosis;
4. patients who had at least one digital subtraction angiography (DSA) follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients missing critical clinical baseline;
2. patients with inadequate DSA image quality for reliable assessment;
3. patients with comorbid cerebrovascular conditions, including arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous malformations;
4. patients without any follow-up information.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University International Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Lv

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Turhon M, Kang H, Liu J, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Huang J, Wang K, Li M, Liu J, Zhang H, Li T, Song D, Zhao Y, Luo B, Maimaiti A, Aisha M, Wang Y, Feng W, Wang Y, Wan J, Mao G, Shi H, Yang X, Guan S. In-Stent Stenosis After Pipeline Embolization Device in Intracranial Aneurysms: Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec 1;91(6):943-951. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002142. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36129281 (View on PubMed)

John S, Bain MD, Hui FK, Hussain MS, Masaryk TJ, Rasmussen PA, Toth G. Long-term Follow-up of In-stent Stenosis After Pipeline Flow Diversion Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2016 Jun;78(6):862-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001146.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26600281 (View on PubMed)

Wang T, Richard SA, Jiao H, Li J, Lin S, Zhang C, Wang C, Xie X, You C. Institutional experience of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow diverter implantation: A retrospective analysis of 6 isolated cases out of 118 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 19;100(11):e25149. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025149.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33725998 (View on PubMed)

Dong L, Wang C, Chen X, Li M, Li T, Liu H, Zhao Y, Duan R, Jin W, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Lv M. Predicting Persistent Aneurysm Filling After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysm: Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Model. Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Apr;16(2):392-402. doi: 10.1007/s12975-023-01222-9. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38066403 (View on PubMed)

Kadirvel R, Ding YH, Dai D, Rezek I, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):394-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130796. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24086073 (View on PubMed)

Kang H, Zhou Y, Luo B, Lv N, Zhang H, Li T, Song D, Zhao Y, Guan S, Maimaitili A, Wang Y, Feng W, Wang Y, Wan J, Mao G, Shi H, Yang X, Liu J. Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large Chinese Cohort: Complication Risk Factor Analysis. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Apr;18(2):1198-1206. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33447904 (View on PubMed)

Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Moran CJ, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Cekirge SH, Nelson PK. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):858-68. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23418004 (View on PubMed)

Hanel RA, Cortez GM, Lopes DK, Nelson PK, Siddiqui AH, Jabbour P, Mendes Pereira V, Istvan IS, Zaidat OO, Bettegowda C, Colby GP, Mokin M, Schirmer CM, Hellinger FR, Given C, Krings T, Taussky P, Toth G, Fraser JF, Chen M, Priest R, Kan P, Fiorella D, Frei D, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Diaz O, Malek AM, Cawley CM, Puri AS, Kallmes DF. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):248-254. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018501. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35292570 (View on PubMed)

Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, Broderick JP, Cockroft KM, Connolly ES Jr, Duckwiler GR, Harris CC, Howard VJ, Johnston SC, Meyers PM, Molyneux A, Ogilvy CS, Ringer AJ, Torner J; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2368-400. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000070. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26089327 (View on PubMed)

Liu Q, Li K, He H, Miao Z, Cui H, Wu J, Ding S, Wen Z, Chen J, Lu X, Li J, Zheng L, Wang S. The markers and risk stratification model of intracranial aneurysm instability in a large Chinese cohort. Sci Bull (Beijing). 2023 Jun 15;68(11):1162-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37210332 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PED-ISS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id