Comparison of Robot Assisted Gait Training and Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training Using Gait Analysis and SEMG Measurements
NCT ID: NCT06715098
Last Updated: 2024-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-14
2024-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RoboGait group
Robotic walking training 3 days a week, 30 minutes a day for 4 weeks
RoboGait
RoboGait: robotic-assisted gait training
RehaWalk group
Walking training on treadmill with body weight support for 30 minutes a day, 3 days a week for 4 weeks
RehaWalk
RehaWalk: body weight-supported treadmill training
Conventional Group
Conventional walking training for 30 minutes a day, 3 days a week for 4 weeks
Conventional
Conventional: conventional walking training
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RoboGait
RoboGait: robotic-assisted gait training
RehaWalk
RehaWalk: body weight-supported treadmill training
Conventional
Conventional: conventional walking training
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chronic stage stroke (6 months - 2 years)
* First stroke
* Spasticity of Ashworth stage 2 or lower
* Ability to follow commands
* Ability to walk unsupported for more than 10 meters
* No treatment received in the last month
Exclusion Criteria
* Unstable fracture
* Excessive spasticity (Ashworth stage 3 and above)
* Cognitive impairment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pamukkale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Füsun Ardıç
Professor Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Füsun Ardıç, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Pamukkale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pamukkale University
Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kuriakose D, Xiao Z. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 15;21(20):7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609.
GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
Stroke, Cerebrovascular accident, WHO. Accessed: 08.10.2023 https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/stroke-cerebrovascular-accident/index.html
Furie K. Epidemiology and Primary Prevention of Stroke. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020 Apr;26(2):260-267. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000831.
Buntin MB, Colla CH, Deb P, Sood N, Escarce JJ. Medicare spending and outcomes after postacute care for stroke and hip fracture. Med Care. 2010 Sep;48(9):776-84. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e359df.
Selves C, Stoquart G, Lejeune T. Gait rehabilitation after stroke: review of the evidence of predictors, clinical outcomes and timing for interventions. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020 Aug;120(4):783-790. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01320-7. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Druzbicki M, Przysada G, Guzik A, Brzozowska-Magon A, Kolodziej K, Wolan-Nieroda A, Majewska J, Kwolek A. The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 5;2018:3812602. doi: 10.1155/2018/3812602. eCollection 2018.
Malik AN, Tariq H, Afridi A, Rathore FA. Technological advancements in stroke rehabilitation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Aug;72(8):1672-1674. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.22-90.
Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):479-96. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0210.
Schwartz I, Meiner Z. Robotic-assisted gait training in neurological patients: who may benefit? Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 May;43(5):1260-9. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1283-x. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
Yoo HJ, Bae CR, Jeong H, Ko MH, Kang YK, Pyun SB. Clinical efficacy of overground powered exoskeleton for gait training in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 27;102(4):e32761. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032761.
Özbudak Demir S. Robot-Assisted Gait Training for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2015;61 (Supp. 1):S37-S44.
Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke. 1998 Jun;29(6):1122-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1122.
Zhang H, Li X, Gong Y, Wu J, Chen J, Chen W, Pei Z, Zhang W, Dai L, Shu X, Shen C. Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis and sEMG Measures for Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2023 Apr 11;2023:7563802. doi: 10.1155/2023/7563802. eCollection 2023.
Lura DJ, Venglar MC, van Duijn AJ, Csavina KR. Body weight supported treadmill vs. overground gait training for acute stroke gait rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Sep;42(3):270-274. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000357.
Middleton A, Merlo-Rains A, Peters DM, Greene JV, Blanck EL, Moran R, Fritz SL. Body weight-supported treadmill training is no better than overground training for individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):462-76. doi: 10.1310/tsr2106-462.
Mao YR, Lo WL, Lin Q, Li L, Xiao X, Raghavan P, Huang DF. The Effect of Body Weight Support Treadmill Training on Gait Recovery, Proximal Lower Limb Motor Pattern, and Balance in Patients with Subacute Stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:175719. doi: 10.1155/2015/175719. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
Choi W. Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training with Body Weight Support on Gait and Balance in Stroke Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 10;19(10):5814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105814.
Tanaka N, Yano H, Ebata Y, Ebihara K. Influence of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Lower-Limb Muscle Activity in Patients With Stroke: Comparison With Conventional Gait Training. Ann Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;47(3):205-213. doi: 10.5535/arm.22147. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
Brunelli S, Iosa M, Fusco FR, Pirri C, Di Giunta C, Foti C, Traballesi M. Early body weight-supported overground walking training in patients with stroke in subacute phase compared to conventional physiotherapy: a randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Dec;42(4):309-315. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000363.
Esquenazi A, Lee S, Wikoff A, Packel A, Toczylowski T, Feeley J. A Comparison of Locomotor Therapy Interventions: Partial-Body Weight-Supported Treadmill, Lokomat, and G-EO Training in People With Traumatic Brain Injury. PM R. 2017 Sep;9(9):839-846. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
Lee JH, Lee MH. The effects of smartphone multitasking on gait and dynamic balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Feb;30(2):293-296. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.293. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35.
Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa A, Gallichio J, McLeod M, Moore C, Wu SS, Duncan PW. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):427-32. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592766. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
Warutkar V, Dadgal R, Mangulkar UR. Use of Robotics in Gait Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Review. Cureus. 2022 Nov 4;14(11):e31075. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31075. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Lefeber N, De Keersmaecker E, Henderix S, Michielsen M, Kerckhofs E, Swinnen E. Physiological Responses and Perceived Exertion During Robot-Assisted and Body Weight-Supported Gait After Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Dec;32(12):1043-1054. doi: 10.1177/1545968318810810. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
RehaWalk - Ganganalyse und Training. Erişim: 08.10.2023 https://www.zebris.de/medizin/rehawalkr-ganganalyse-und-gangtraining-in-der-rehabilitation.
Bedla M, Pieta P, Kaczmarski D, Deniziak S. Estimation of Gross Motor Functions in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using Zebris FDM-T Treadmill. J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 12;11(4):954. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040954.
Yang YR, Chen IH, Liao KK, Huang CC, Wang RY. Cortical reorganization induced by body weight-supported treadmill training in patients with hemiparesis of different stroke durations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Apr;91(4):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PamukkaleU.ftr-FArdıç-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id