Change in Task-related Oxygen Uptake After EBV Treatment

NCT ID: NCT06702072

Last Updated: 2024-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) has emerged as a viable treatment option for eligible patients with severe emphysema. In all studies conducted so far, exercise capacity has only been measured using the 6-minute walk distance test (6MWT). It is known that patients with COPD frequently experience problems during ADL, which can lead to avoidance of or care dependency for performing certain tasks and have a significant social impact on their lives.

Patients report that it is easier to perform ADLs after EBV treatment. Previously it was found that it was easier for patient to perform these activities after the EBV treatment. However, the physiological load during these ADLs has never been investigated before.

Potentially, EBV treatment could improve the metabolic load and consequently symptom perception, thus enhancing the execution of ADLs, which is an important patient-centred outcome. However, this has not been investigated so far.

Objective: To investigate the change in exercise physiology during daily activities after EBV treatment.

Study design: Observational study in which the study population will be asked to perform some additional test during regular visits for the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with valves.

Study population: Patients with emphysema who are scheduled for a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves.

Intervention: Not applicable Main study parameters: The change in task-related oxygen uptake measured with a mobile oxygen device during activities of daily life 6 months after EBV treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) has emerged as a viable treatment option for eligible patients with severe emphysema. In all studies conducted so far, exercise capacity has only been measured using the 6-minute walk distance test (6MWT). The 6MWT is conducted under laboratory conditions, which weakly correspond to activities of daily living (ADL). It is known that patients with COPD frequently experience problems during ADL, which can lead to avoidance of or care dependency for performing certain tasks and have a significant social impact on their lives.

Patients report that it is easier to perform ADLs after EBV treatment. Previously, it was found that it was easier for patient to perform these activities after the EBV treatment. However, the physiological load during these ADLs was not investigated before. This could be measured with a mobile oxygen device which can measure oxygen uptake (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) under more functional conditions and thus measure the metabolic load of these activities.

Potentially, EBV treatment could improve the metabolic load and consequently symptom perception, thus enhancing the execution of ADLs, which is an important patient-centred outcome. However, this has not been investigated so far.

Objective: To investigate the change in exercise physiology during daily activities after EBV treatment.

Study design: Observational study in which the study population will be asked to perform some additional test during regular visits for the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with valves.

Study population: Patients with emphysema who are scheduled for a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves.

Intervention: Not applicable Main study parameters: The change in task-related oxygen uptake measured with a mobile oxygen device during activities of daily life 6 months after EBV treatment.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This study has no specific benefits for the participating patients and the study also has no major risks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endobronchial valve treatment

Patients who are undergo a bronchoscopic treatment using endobronchial valves.

Endobronchial valve treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endobronchial valve treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endobronchial valve treatment

Endobronchial valve treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is scheduled for a bronchoscopic lung volume treatment using Pulmonx Zephyr Endobronchial Valves;
2. Patient read, understood and signed the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria

1\) Patients who cannot perform ADL activities without the use of Long Term Oxygen Therapy (LTOT).
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dirk-Jan Slebos

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dirk-Jan Slebos

MD PhD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jorine E Hartman, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0031503619194

Marlies van DIjk, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

0031503619194

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jorine E. Hartman, PhD

Role: primary

0031503619194

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CROCODILE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.