Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
194 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2028-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thus, the main question it aims to answer is:
Is water sufficient to interpret MRE from patients with Crohn's disease?
Researchers will compare the standard protocol (polyethylene glycol) with water as bowel distension agent to see if it is possible to obtain a satisfying global distension of small bowel.
Participants will undergo the same procedures as standard care adding questionnaires and replacing water as the bowel distension agent for the MRE for patient randomized into the experimental group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Performance of Non-injected MR Enterography Compared to a Conventional MR Enterography Protocol With Contrast Agent Injection
NCT06526234
Bowel Preparation for Magnetic Resonance Enterography
NCT03541733
Evaluation of a New Oral Contrast Agent for MR Enterography in the Assessment of Crohn Disease in the Small Bowel
NCT00587210
Value of PET/MR Enterography in the Assessment of Crohn's Disease Using a Collagen-binding Radiotracer.
NCT06252493
MRE Predictors of Disease Relapse After Stopping Biologics
NCT06124287
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of our study is to compare standard protocol (polyethylene glycol) with water as bowel distension agent in IBD patients requiring MRE on their ability to obtain a satisfying global distension of small bowel (on a previously validated scale).
Due to the side effects linked to the ingestion of 1.5L of distension agent and the impossibility of evaluating the tolerance of each contrast agent if 2 MREs are carried out on the same day, each the participant will benefit from an MRI using a single preparation modality (water or PEG).
To ensure comparability of the groups, patients will be randomized with 1:1 ratio after stratification on past bowel resection and structuring phenotype. The exams and distension scores will be determined by two radiologists (one expert and one trainee) blinded on patient allocation group. Regarding side effects, patient will fulfill several questionnaires after the exam and at 48h (end of follow-up).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The exams and distension scores will be determined by two radiologists (one expert and one trainee) blinded on patient allocation group. In case of disagreement, a third radiologist (expert) will be required.
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
WATER
ingestion of 1.5L of water 30min prior MRE acquisition
water preparation
ingestion of 1.5L of water 30min prior MRE acquisition
PEG
ingestion of 1.5L of water diluted PEG 45 min prior MRE acquisition (standard protocol)
polyethylene glycol preparation
ingestion of 1.5L of water diluted PEG 45 min prior MRE acquisition (standard protocol)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
water preparation
ingestion of 1.5L of water 30min prior MRE acquisition
polyethylene glycol preparation
ingestion of 1.5L of water diluted PEG 45 min prior MRE acquisition (standard protocol)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* need for MRE (determined by patient's gastroenterologist)
Exclusion Criteria
* inability to obtain an informed consent,
* patient under guardianship or curatorship, allergy to PEG,
* contraindication to MRE (pregnancy, pace maker, claustrophobia in particular), - contraindication to phloroglucinol administration (phenylcetonuria),
* contraindication to gadolinium administration (kidney failure with glomerular filtration rate \< 30/mL/1.73m², pregnancy, allergy).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC31/24/0238
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.