The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Body Weight and Dietary Habits in Young Adult Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
NCT ID: NCT06685432
Last Updated: 2025-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-20
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypotheses:
1. The rate of decrease in body weight of individuals in the intervention group with motivational interviewing (MI) is higher than the control group.
2. Individuals in the intervention group with MI show more improvement in healthy eating behaviors than the control group.
3. The decrease in daily energy and fat intake of individuals in the intervention group with MI is higher than the control group.
4. The rate of vegetables and fruits in daily food consumption of individuals in the intervention group with MI is higher than the control group.
All participants were interviewed one-on-one in the one-hour intervention group (n=40) and the control group (n=40) for a total of 6 times in two weeks for three months (12 weeks) in a 30-minute video conference environment.
Depending on the participant in the intervention group that received motivational interviews, the interview period was extended if necessary.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Anthropometric Measurements, Eating Attitudes, and Cardiometabolic Index in Overweight and Obese Patients
NCT06947798
Does Motivational Interviewing Improve Behavioral Weight Loss Outcomes for Obesity?
NCT02649634
Motivational Interviewing for Weight Loss With Young Adults
NCT01899625
Internet Obesity Treatment Enhanced With Motivational Interviewing
NCT01232699
Motivational Interviewing to Address Freshman Weight Gain
NCT04130386
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Before and at the end of the study, all participants were asked to fill out the Healthy Lifestyle Behavior Scale (HLBS), Food consumption frequency (which form), International Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ-short form) and 24-h food consumption record for three consecutive days of the week (2 weekdays and 1 weekend) in an online data environment.
Participants were given portion training using the Turkish Ministry of Health's Turkish Nutrition Guide (TUBER). During the study (12 weeks), participants recorded 24-hour food consumption and physical activity records three days a week. The forms were sent to the researcher via online mail or social media (whatsapp) before the interview. Participants stated their height and were asked to measure their body weight on an empty stomach, without shoes and wearing light clothing, using a scale they used once a week, and their waist and hip circumferences were measured using a non-extensible tape measure.
In addition; the participants in the intervention group were given a medical nutrition treatment program along with motivational interview techniques. The control group was given only a medical nutrition program.
Daily energy needs in both groups were calculated using the Harris Benedict equation and a diet program was prepared to provide a weight loss of 0.5-1 kg per week. Accordingly, it was aimed to reduce the participant's daily energy intake by approximately 500-600 kcal, thus achieving a 10% kcal decrease in body weight. The diet program included 45-60% carbohydrates, 10-20% protein and 20-35% fat.
Measures Participant information form: All participants were female. In this study includes questions about marital status, people they live with, health status, use of nutritional supplements, smoking and alcohol use, number of meals, reasons for skipping meals, and whether they received help for weight loss.
Anthropometric measurements: height, waist, hip, body weight measurements were taken by the participant herself at the beginning and end of the study.
Healthy Lifestyle Behavior Scale (HLBS): The scale developed by Walker et al. measures the individual's health-enhancing behaviors related to a healthy lifestyle. The lowest total score obtained from the scale is 52, the highest total score is 208.
Food Consumption Frequency:
For each food, the expressions "every meal", "every day", "1-2 times a week", "3-4 times a week", "5-6 times a week", "2-3 times a month", "once a month or less often" were used and the consumption amounts were questioned.
Food consumption record:
International Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form:
It is used to determine the physical activity levels and sedentary lifestyles of adults.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
The daily energy needs of the participants in the Medical Nutrition Program were calculated using the basal metabolic rate obtained with the Harris Benedict equation and the PAL (Physical activity level) value obtained from the average of three-day physical activity records (Total Energy Expenditure = BMR x PAL). In the study, a program was prepared in such a way that the daily energy intake of the participants in the nutritional treatment would provide a weight loss of 0.5-1 kg per week. Accordingly, it was aimed to reduce the participant's daily energy intake by approximately 500-600 kcal and provide a 10% kcal decrease in their body weight. A diet program containing 45-60% carbohydrate, 10-20% protein and 20-35% fat in the daily energy needs was applied.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention
Diet
The effect of motivational interviewing techniques was examined in addition to diet treatment. The effect of motivational interviewing techniques on anthropometric measurements before and after the study was evaluated. The participants' indecisiveness was investigated and a self-directed "change conversation" was presented. Behavior change strategies including determining positive and negative aspects, using importance and confidence scales, and setting the agenda were applied by the researcher.
In the interviews that included motivational interviewing techniques:
1. A participant-centered interview was conducted by collaborating with the participant.
2. The researcher was impartial and did not assume the role of an expert.
3. At the beginning of the interview, an evaluation of what was discussed in the previous week was made.
4. First of all, an attempt was made to determine the agenda according to the topic the participant wanted to discuss.
5. The importance scale was used (1-10).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diet
The effect of motivational interviewing techniques was examined in addition to diet treatment. The effect of motivational interviewing techniques on anthropometric measurements before and after the study was evaluated. The participants' indecisiveness was investigated and a self-directed "change conversation" was presented. Behavior change strategies including determining positive and negative aspects, using importance and confidence scales, and setting the agenda were applied by the researcher.
In the interviews that included motivational interviewing techniques:
1. A participant-centered interview was conducted by collaborating with the participant.
2. The researcher was impartial and did not assume the role of an expert.
3. At the beginning of the interview, an evaluation of what was discussed in the previous week was made.
4. First of all, an attempt was made to determine the agenda according to the topic the participant wanted to discuss.
5. The importance scale was used (1-10).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Between 19-50 years of age,
3. BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2,
4. No condition that would prevent movement,
5. No chronic disease (e.g. cardiovascular problems, neurological diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, etc.)
6. Individuals who signed the consent form and agreed to participate in the study were included.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Menopausal,
3. Breastfeeding,
4. Chronic disease (e.g. cardiovascular problems, neurological diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, etc.)
5. History of eating disorders,
6. Not simultaneously following another nutrition counseling program,
7. History of bariatric surgery,
8. Using medications that affect body weight control,
9. Abusing drugs and alcohol,
10. Having voluntary vomiting behavior more than once a month,
11. Purgative habits (use of laxatives, diuretics, etc.),
12. On a special diet,
14. Gender :Male
19 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sibel ERDEM
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sibel ERDEM
Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
SİBEL ERDEM, LECTURER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
university
PELİN BİLGİÇ, ASSOC. PROF.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mugla Sitki Kocman Unıversity
Muğla, Fethiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-72855364-050.01.044-299714
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.