Outcome in Patients Treated With Endovascular Thrombectomy - optIMAL Blood Pressure Control 2 (OPTIMAL-BP 2)

NCT ID: NCT06677970

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-01

Study Completion Date

2029-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Though intravenous thrombolysis has been shown to improve symptoms in acute ischemic stroke patients, the recanalization rate remains low (22.6%) and only around 30% of patients benefit from the treatment. Recently, endovascular thrombectomy using stent retrievers or catheters has proven to be more effective, with a success rate of nearly 80%. However, only 50% of patients experience clinical improvement, highlighting the need for new treatment strategies to enhance outcomes. Current guidelines recommend maintaining systolic blood pressure (BP) below 180 mmHg after thrombectomy, but there is a lack of evidence regarding optimal blood pressure management post-reperfusion.

Four randomized clinical trials, including the OPTIMAL-BP trial, have examined blood pressure control following thrombectomy. Meta-analyses showed that intensive BP lowering did not reduce symptomatic hemorrhage and was associated with worse functional outcomes at 3 months. Specifically, lowering BP too aggressively after successful reperfusion could worsen outcomes by reducing perfusion to the ischemic penumbra. Therefore, this study will investigate whether a more targeted blood pressure elevation strategy could improve patient prognosis compared to standard BP control in those with post-thrombectomy systolic BP below 150 mmHg.

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) design, aimed at comparing intensive and standard BP control strategies in acute ischemic stroke patients. Participants will be randomized 1:1 into either an intensive BP control group (targeting a 20% systolic BP increase, capped at less than 160 mmHg) or a standard BP control group (systolic BP at or below 180 mmHg).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. This is a prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) design.
2. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intensive BP control group (targeting a 20% increase from baseline systolic BP, capped at less than 160 mmHg) or a standard BP control group (maintaining systolic BP at or below 180 mmHg).
3. Randomization: Allocation will be stratified by stroke severity (NIHSS \<15 or ≥15) and participating study center. Randomization will be conducted via a web-based system using a pre-generated randomization table created by a statistician. Investigators will enter stratification variables (study center, NIHSS score) into the system to receive the randomized allocation.
4. This is a multi-center prospective study involving patients admitted to participating hospitals for acute ischemic stroke between October 2024 and December 2029 (last visit date). The study will include patients who undergo successful intra-arterial reperfusion therapy based on current stroke guidelines.
5. Data collection will include the medical history, imaging findings, BP parameters (systolic BP, diastolic BP, BP variability), neurological scores, functional recovery, and quality of life (QoL) measures for eligible participants.
6. Neurological scores, functional recovery, and QoL assessments will be conducted by independent evaluators who are blinded to treatment allocation.
7. All data will be collected using electronic case report forms (e-CRF), and anonymized imaging data will be sent to the coordinating center.
8. The coordinating center will perform blinded quantification of imaging results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Blood pressure Ischemic stroke thrombectomy outcome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

a multicenter, randomized, open Lable, blinded end-point clinical trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The mRS scores and adverse events were determined in participants at 1 month and 3 months via telephone or in person by local certified medical staff who were blinded to the treatment allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional BP magnagement group (SBP ≤180 mmHg)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BP lowering drugs (nicardipine, labetalol, urapidil)

Intervention Type DRUG

After successful reperfusion, appropriate antihypertension medication is administered to control systolic blood pressure \<180 mmHg.

Intensive BP raising group (20% increase in SBP, maximum of 160 mmHg )

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BP raising drug (phenylephrine) or BP lowering drugs (nicardipine, labetalol, urapidil)

Intervention Type DRUG

After successful reperfusion, appropriate BP raising (20% increase in SBP, maximum of 160 from baseline SBP) are administered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BP lowering drugs (nicardipine, labetalol, urapidil)

After successful reperfusion, appropriate antihypertension medication is administered to control systolic blood pressure \<180 mmHg.

Intervention Type DRUG

BP raising drug (phenylephrine) or BP lowering drugs (nicardipine, labetalol, urapidil)

After successful reperfusion, appropriate BP raising (20% increase in SBP, maximum of 160 from baseline SBP) are administered.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥20 years
* Patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (ICA, M1, M2, A1, P1, and VBA).
* Successful recanalization of the intracranial artery after endovascular thrombectomy (modified TICI 2b, 2c or TICI 3).
* Patients whose mean systolic blood pressure was measured to be below 150 mmHg on at least two occasions, taken 2 minutes apart, within 2 hours of successful recanalization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<20
* Patients who failed recanalization of the intracranial artery after endovascular thrombectomy (modified TICI ≤ 2a).
* Patients with systolic blood pressure ≥ 150 mmHg after successful recanalization.
* Patients unable to receive antihypertensive medication post-thrombectomy or in whom the investigator believes aggressive blood pressure control could have adverse effects, such as increased risk of hemorrhage.
* Patients who developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage before study enrollment, after successful recanalization.
* Patients with pre-existing neurological deficits (modified Rankin Scale, mRS ≥ 3).
* Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, defined as an ejection fraction \<30%.
* Patients with end-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy or chronic kidney disease stage 4 with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min.
* Patients receiving MAO inhibitors.
* Patients who are currently pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hyo Suk Nam, MD,PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 82-2-2228-1617

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hyo Suk Nam, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2024-0880

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id