Efficacy of Adding Neural Mobilization Techniques in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT ID: NCT06663592
Last Updated: 2024-12-10
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
33 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2024-12-10
Study Completion Date
2025-03-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effects of adding slider neural mobilization technique compared to tensioner neural mobilization technique to conventional physical therapy treatment on pain, function, cervical range of motion, hand grip strength, and electrophysiological parameters of the median nerve in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a condition where the nerve root of a spinal nerve is compressed or impaired, causing the pain and symptoms to spread beyond the neck, radiating to the shoulder, and upper limb. Cervical radiculopathy primarily results from an impingement and inflammation of a nerve root induced by a space-occupying lesion that reduces the size of the intervertebral foramen, as a degenerative lesion of the zygapophyseal joint or it is associated with a cervical disc derangement.
Patients presenting with CR complain of neck, periscapular, and radicular pain into the hand and arm. As well as neurologic symptoms such as sensory disturbances (paresthesia or numbness), muscle weakness with a reduced tendon reflexes in the affected nerve root or combination of these signs and symptoms .
The reported annual incidence of CR is 85 cases per 100,000 people in the population, while the prevalence is 3.5/1000 persons. The C7 nerve root is most frequently impacted, with more than half of all cases affecting this level.
Several studies utilized therapeutic exercises, manual therapy, other modalities cervical collar, cervical traction, postural education and different medications such as drugs and steroid injections in the conservative management for cervical radiculopathy in its different stages.
The neural mobilization (NM) is a manual therapy method that improves neural flexibility, lowers dynamic sensitivity of the nervous system, increases blood flow, and relief pain; for that, improved neural mobility and alleviated pain increases joint range of motion (ROM).
The neural mobilization techniques (NM) are delivered by two techniques, "sliding/gliding" and "tensioning". Tensioner technique generate tension from both ends of the nerve, while sliders involve gliding of the nerve relative to its surrounding structures by performing joint movements that elongate the nerve bed with minimal strain. In addition, sliders are usually less aggressive than tensioners and their use might be indicated at early disease stages.
Both techniques aid in preventing the formation of adhesions, to reduce endoneurial pressure reduce intraneural oedema increase nerve oxygenation, and decrease the ischemic pain.
Studies which used sliders and tensioners NM techniques in their clinical studies, showed significant changes in biomechanical factors such as patients' self-reports of pain, disability, ROM, endurance and muscle strength in management of musculoskeletal neck disorders with nerve-related symptoms.
Therefore, What are the possible effects of adding tensioner neural mobilization technique versus slider neural mobilization technique to conventional physical treatment in treating patients with cervical radiculopathy?
Patients presenting with CR complain of neck, periscapular, and radicular pain into the hand and arm. As well as neurologic symptoms such as sensory disturbances (paresthesia or numbness), muscle weakness with a reduced tendon reflexes in the affected nerve root or combination of these signs and symptoms .
The reported annual incidence of CR is 85 cases per 100,000 people in the population, while the prevalence is 3.5/1000 persons. The C7 nerve root is most frequently impacted, with more than half of all cases affecting this level.
Several studies utilized therapeutic exercises, manual therapy, other modalities cervical collar, cervical traction, postural education and different medications such as drugs and steroid injections in the conservative management for cervical radiculopathy in its different stages.
The neural mobilization (NM) is a manual therapy method that improves neural flexibility, lowers dynamic sensitivity of the nervous system, increases blood flow, and relief pain; for that, improved neural mobility and alleviated pain increases joint range of motion (ROM).
The neural mobilization techniques (NM) are delivered by two techniques, "sliding/gliding" and "tensioning". Tensioner technique generate tension from both ends of the nerve, while sliders involve gliding of the nerve relative to its surrounding structures by performing joint movements that elongate the nerve bed with minimal strain. In addition, sliders are usually less aggressive than tensioners and their use might be indicated at early disease stages.
Both techniques aid in preventing the formation of adhesions, to reduce endoneurial pressure reduce intraneural oedema increase nerve oxygenation, and decrease the ischemic pain.
Studies which used sliders and tensioners NM techniques in their clinical studies, showed significant changes in biomechanical factors such as patients' self-reports of pain, disability, ROM, endurance and muscle strength in management of musculoskeletal neck disorders with nerve-related symptoms.
Therefore, What are the possible effects of adding tensioner neural mobilization technique versus slider neural mobilization technique to conventional physical treatment in treating patients with cervical radiculopathy?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Cervical Radiculopathy
Neuromobılızatıon
Median Nerve
Electromyography
Nerve Conduction
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
TRIPLE
Participants
Investigators
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group A (conventional treatment)
Conventional treatment, including hot pack, stretching of the neck muscles, cervical isometrics exercise.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Conventional treatment
Intervention Type
OTHER
hot pack, stretching of the neck muscles, cervical isometrics exercise
Experimental group B (Tensioning neural mobilization with addition to conventional treatment)
Median nerve neural tensioning mobilization with addition to conventional treatment
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Tensioner Neuro Dynamic Mobilization
Intervention Type
OTHER
Median nerve tensioner neural mobilization with addition to conventional treatment
Experimental group C (Sliding neural mobilization with addition to conventional treatment)
Median nerve sliding neural mobilization with addition to conventional treatment
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Slider Neuro Dynamic Mobilization
Intervention Type
OTHER
Median nerve neural sliding mobilization with addition to conventional treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional treatment
hot pack, stretching of the neck muscles, cervical isometrics exercise
Intervention Type
OTHER
Tensioner Neuro Dynamic Mobilization
Median nerve tensioner neural mobilization with addition to conventional treatment
Intervention Type
OTHER
Slider Neuro Dynamic Mobilization
Median nerve neural sliding mobilization with addition to conventional treatment
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Current continuous or intermittent pain that has persisted for more than 3 months.
2. Motor, reflex, and/ or sensory changes in the upper limb.
3. Diminished deep tendon reflexes in the affected arm.
4. Paresthesia or numbness along the course of the nerve.
5. A positive Upper Limb Neural Tension 1 (ULNT) test for the median nerve, Spurlings test, compression test, cervical distraction test, less than 60° cervical rotation towards the symptomatic side, and Valsalva maneuver.
6. Unilateral affection in the upper limb.
2. Motor, reflex, and/ or sensory changes in the upper limb.
3. Diminished deep tendon reflexes in the affected arm.
4. Paresthesia or numbness along the course of the nerve.
5. A positive Upper Limb Neural Tension 1 (ULNT) test for the median nerve, Spurlings test, compression test, cervical distraction test, less than 60° cervical rotation towards the symptomatic side, and Valsalva maneuver.
6. Unilateral affection in the upper limb.
Exclusion Criteria
1. History of surgical procedures for pathologies giving rise to neck pain or CTS.
2. Clinical signs or symptoms of medical red flags; (infection, cancer, and cardiac involvement).
3. Patients with neck pain for signs and symptoms of serious pathology, upper cervical ligamentous insufficiency, unexplained cranial nerve dysfunction, and fracture.
4. Any systematic disease such as rheumatism and tuberculosis, cervical myelopathy, or multiple sclerosis.
5. Systemic disease is known to cause generalized peripheral neuropathy as diabetes mellitus.
6. Upper Motor neuron disease such as stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
7. Complete loss of sensation along the involved nerve root.
8. Primary report of bilateral radiating arm pain.
9. Inability to tolerate the planned intervention.
10. Pregnant woman.
11. Thoracic outlet syndrome
12. Pronator teres syndrome
2. Clinical signs or symptoms of medical red flags; (infection, cancer, and cardiac involvement).
3. Patients with neck pain for signs and symptoms of serious pathology, upper cervical ligamentous insufficiency, unexplained cranial nerve dysfunction, and fracture.
4. Any systematic disease such as rheumatism and tuberculosis, cervical myelopathy, or multiple sclerosis.
5. Systemic disease is known to cause generalized peripheral neuropathy as diabetes mellitus.
6. Upper Motor neuron disease such as stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
7. Complete loss of sensation along the involved nerve root.
8. Primary report of bilateral radiating arm pain.
9. Inability to tolerate the planned intervention.
10. Pregnant woman.
11. Thoracic outlet syndrome
12. Pronator teres syndrome
Minimum Eligible Age
30 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
50 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hiba Mohammad Hasan
Principal Investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abrams RA, Butler JM, Bodine-Fowler S, Botte MJ. Tensile properties of the neurorrhaphy site in the rat sciatic nerve. J Hand Surg Am. 1998 May;23(3):465-70. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80464-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Adams MA, Dolan P. A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo. J Biomech. 1991;24(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90356-r.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Alharmoodi BY, Arumugam A, Ahbouch A, Moustafa IM. Comparative effects of tensioning and sliding neural mobilization on peripheral and autonomic nervous system function: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2022 Jun;42(1):41-53. doi: 10.1142/S1013702522500056. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Basson A, Olivier B, Ellis R, Coppieters M, Stewart A, Mudzi W. The Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization for Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Sep;47(9):593-615. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7117. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Beaton DE, O'Driscoll SW, Richards RR. Grip strength testing using the BTE work simulator and the Jamar dynamometer: a comparative study. Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment. J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Mar;20(2):293-8. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80029-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bland JH, Boushey DR. Anatomy and physiology of the cervical spine. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug;20(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(90)90090-3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000 Nov;15(9):633-48. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00034-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon J Jr, Hayes M, Hammer B. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):135-42. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000011.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Burke FD, Ellis J, McKenna H, Bradley MJ. Primary care management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2003 Aug;79(934):433-7. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.934.433.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
ISBN 0975091026
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):392-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043887. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Gross AR, Walton DM, Santaguida PL. Treatment preferences amongst physical therapists and chiropractors for the management of neck pain: results of an international survey. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 24;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-22-11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cattrysse E, Barbero M, Kool P, Gagey O, Clarys JP, Van Roy P. 3D morphometry of the transverse and alar ligaments in the occipito-atlanto-axial complex: an in vitro analysis. Clin Anat. 2007 Nov;20(8):892-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.20559.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Christie AD, Inglis JG, Boucher JP, Gabriel DA. Reliability of the FCR H-reflex. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;22(3):204-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):598-602. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cleland JA, Whitman JM, Fritz JM, Palmer JA. Manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;35(12):802-11. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.12.802.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cobian DG, Daehn NS, Anderson PA, Heiderscheit BC. Active cervical and lumbar range of motion during performance of activities of daily living in healthy young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):1754-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a2119c.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Coppieters MW, Alshami AM. Longitudinal excursion and strain in the median nerve during novel nerve gliding exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2007 Jul;25(7):972-80. doi: 10.1002/jor.20310.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Coppieters MW, Butler DS. Do 'sliders' slide and 'tensioners' tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Man Ther. 2008 Jun;13(3):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Coppieters MW, Hough AD, Dilley A. Different nerve-gliding exercises induce different magnitudes of median nerve longitudinal excursion: an in vivo study using dynamic ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Mar;39(3):164-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2913.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Wouters LL, Janssens K. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Jul;33(7):369-78. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.7.369.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dilley A, Lynn B, Greening J, DeLeon N. Quantitative in vivo studies of median nerve sliding in response to wrist, elbow, shoulder and neck movements. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2003 Dec;18(10):899-907. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00176-1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dugailly PM, Sobczak S, Moiseev F, Sholukha V, Salvia P, Feipel V, Rooze M, Van Sint Jan S. Musculoskeletal modeling of the suboccipital spine: kinematics analysis, muscle lengths, and muscle moment arms during axial rotation and flexion extension. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 15;36(6):E413-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc844a.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ellis RF, Hing WA, McNair PJ. Comparison of longitudinal sciatic nerve movement with different mobilization exercises: an in vivo study utilizing ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Aug;42(8):667-75. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3854. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Erel E, Dilley A, Greening J, Morris V, Cohen B, Lynn B. Longitudinal sliding of the median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Oct;28(5):439-43. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00107-4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gugliotti M, Tau J, Gallo K, Sagliocca N, Horan M, Sussman N, Wisnewski R. Between-week reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for upper cervical rotation. J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Jun;29(3):176-180. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1805691. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gilbert KK, Roger James C, Apte G, Brown C, Sizer PS, Brismee JM, Smith MP. Effects of simulated neural mobilization on fluid movement in cadaveric peripheral nerve sections: implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and dysfunction. J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Sep;23(4):219-25. doi: 10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000094.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Guo GM, Li J, Diao QX, Zhu TH, Song ZX, Guo YY, Gao YZ. Cervical lordosis in asymptomatic individuals: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 15;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0854-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Heuer F, Schmidt H, Klezl Z, Claes L, Wilke HJ. Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle. J Biomech. 2007;40(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hsu WK. Advanced techniques in cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):780-8. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jaumard NV, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. J Biomech Eng. 2011 Jul;133(7):071010. doi: 10.1115/1.4004493.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Joghataei MT, Arab AM, Khaksar H. The effect of cervical traction combined with conventional therapy on grip strength on patients with cervical radiculopathy. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Dec;18(8):879-87. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr828oa.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Johnson GM. The sensory and sympathetic nerve supply within the cervical spine: review of recent observations. Man Ther. 2004 May;9(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00093-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kane NM, Oware A. Nerve conduction and electromyography studies. J Neurol. 2012 Jul;259(7):1502-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6497-3. Epub 2012 May 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kim DG, Chung SH, Jung HB. The effects of neural mobilization on cervical radiculopathy patients' pain, disability, ROM, and deep flexor endurance. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Sep 22;30(5):951-959. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140191.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Langevin P, Desmeules F, Lamothe M, Robitaille S, Roy JS. Comparison of 2 manual therapy and exercise protocols for cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial evaluating short-term effects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;45(1):4-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5211.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lee HJ, Kwon HK, Kim DH, Pyun SB. Nerve conduction studies of median motor nerve and median sensory branches according to the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;37(2):254-62. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.2.254. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mansoori SS, Moustafa IM, Ahbouch A, Harrison DE. Optimal duration of stretching exercise in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan 11;53(1):jrm00142. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2781.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mattozzi I. [Conservative treatment of cervical radiculopathy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster]. Minerva Med. 2015 Feb;106(1):1-7. Italian.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Millesi H, Zoch G, Reihsner R. Mechanical properties of peripheral nerves. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 May;(314):76-83.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moustafa IM, Diab AA. Multimodal treatment program comparing 2 different traction approaches for patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. J Chiropr Med. 2014 Sep;13(3):157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2014.07.003.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nachemson AL, Evans JH. Some mechanical properties of the third human lumbar interlaminar ligament (ligamentum flavum). J Biomech. 1968 Aug;1(3):211-20. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(68)90006-7. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nagamoto Y, Ishii T, Iwasaki M, Sakaura H, Moritomo H, Fujimori T, Kashii M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Three-dimensional motion of the uncovertebral joint during head rotation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Oct;17(4):327-33. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.SPINE111104. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ostrov PB, Reddy AK, Ryoo JS, Behbahani M, Mehta AI. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e96-e110. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.099. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF. Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD001466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001466.pub3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
O'Connell GD, Sen S, Elliott DM. Human annulus fibrosus material properties from biaxial testing and constitutive modeling are altered with degeneration. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2012 Mar;11(3-4):493-503. doi: 10.1007/s10237-011-0328-9. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Osmotherly PG, Rivett D, Rowe LJ. Toward understanding normal craniocervical rotation occurring during the rotation stress test for the alar ligaments. Phys Ther. 2013 Jul;93(7):986-92. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120266. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Papacharalambous C, Savva C, Karagiannis C, Giannakou K. The effectiveness of slider and tensioner neural mobilization techniques in the management of upper quadrant pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jul;31:102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med. 2001 Jan;33(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/165019701300006524.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Persson LC, Carlsson CA, Carlsson JY. Long-lasting cervical radicular pain managed with surgery, physiotherapy, or a cervical collar. A prospective, randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Apr 1;22(7):751-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199704010-00007.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rafiq S, Zafar H, Gillani SA, Waqas MS, Zia A, Liaqat S, Rafiq Y. Comparison of neural mobilization and conservative treatment on pain, range of motion, and disability in cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 6;17(12):e0278177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278177. eCollection 2022.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ahangar-Sirous R, Alizadeh M, Nejadghaderi SA, Noori M, Khabbazi A, Sullman MJM, Kolahi AA, Collins GS, Safiri S. The burden of neck pain in the Middle East and North Africa region, 1990-2019. Heliyon. 2023 Oct 21;9(11):e21296. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21296. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rushton A, Rivett D, Carlesso L, Flynn T, Hing W, Kerry R. International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction prior to Orthopaedic Manual Therapy intervention. Man Ther. 2014 Jun;19(3):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sadeghi A, Rostami M, Ameri S, Karimi Moghaddam A, Karimi Moghaddam Z, Zeraatchi A. Effectiveness of isometric exercises on disability and pain of cervical spondylosis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 16;14(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00500-7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Salem W, Lenders C, Mathieu J, Hermanus N, Klein P. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation. Man Ther. 2013 Aug;18(4):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sarwan G, De Jesus O. Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Cervical Radiculopathy. 2023 Aug 23. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563152/
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Savva C, Giakas G, Efstathiou M, Karagiannis C. Test-retest reliability of handgrip strength measurement using a hydraulic hand dynamometer in patients with cervical radiculopathy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(3):206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shaheen AA, Omar MT, Vernon H. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Arabic version of neck disability index in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 1;38(10):E609-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b2d09.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Smith SA, Massie JB, Chesnut R, Garfin SR. Straight leg raising. Anatomical effects on the spinal nerve root without and with fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jun 15;18(8):992-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Strickler T, Malone T, Garrett WE. The effects of passive warming on muscle injury. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):141-5. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800206.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sunderland S. The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve. 1990 Sep;13(9):771-84. doi: 10.1002/mus.880130903.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Taso M, Sommernes JH, Kolstad F, Sundseth J, Bjorland S, Pripp AH, Zwart JA, Brox JI. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Mar 16;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3188-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thoomes EJ, Scholten-Peeters GG, de Boer AJ, Olsthoorn RA, Verkerk K, Lin C, Verhagen AP. Lack of uniform diagnostic criteria for cervical radiculopathy in conservative intervention studies: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1459-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2297-9. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
van Geest S, Kuijper B, Oterdoom M, van den Hout W, Brand R, Stijnen T, Assendelft P, Koes B, Jacobs W, Peul W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C. CASINO: surgical or nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Apr 14;15:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-129.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Ostelo R, van Tulder MW, Peul W, Koes BW, Verhagen AP. Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2553-z. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Varangot-Reille C, Cuenca-Martinez F, Arribas-Romano A, Bertoletti-Rodriguez R, Gutierrez-Martin A, Mateo-Perrino F, Suso-Marti L, Blanco-Diaz M, Calatayud J, Casana J. Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization Techniques in the Management of Musculoskeletal Neck Disorders with Nerve-Related Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Mapping Report. Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):707-732. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab300.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Dec;30(12):728-44. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.12.728.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):52-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yahia LH, Garzon S, Strykowski H, Rivard CH. Ultrastructure of the human interspinous ligament and ligamentum flavum. A preliminary study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Apr;15(4):262-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199004000-00002.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, Aguilera AJ, Snyder AR. Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2009 Jul;89(7):632-42. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080283. Epub 2009 May 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zhang QH, Teo EC, Ng HW, Lee VS. Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine. J Biomech. 2006;39(1):189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.029. Epub 2004 Dec 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P.T.REC/012/005270
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id