Linkage to Care and Treatment of Chronic HBV Patients

NCT ID: NCT06658678

Last Updated: 2024-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

803 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-03

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic hepatitis B remains the leading cause of liver related mortality and morbidity globally and locally. Countries have been formulating initiatives to meet the WHO target of eliminating viral hepatitis by 2030. However, data on the most important aspect of management of chronic hepatitis B, namely linkage to care and treatment, remains scarce. In order to achieve the WHO goal, treatment rate of eligible patients should reach 80%.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diagnosing patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and establishing linkage to treatment is important in achieving the World Health Organization (WHO) objectives in eliminating HBV as a public health threat by 2030. Global HBV diagnosis rates and treatment rates among eligible patients were 10% and 5% respectively. In Mainland China and Hong Kong, estimated diagnosis and treatment coverage were 19-27% and 11-22% respectively, similarly much lower than the WHO 2030 goals of 90% for diagnosis and 80% for treatment. A recent modeling study demonstrated that even if a modest 50% diagnosis rate was achieved in China, this will result in a 19% mortality decline, with 2.1 million deaths averted. Currently, HBV screening is recommended for persons born in regions with a HBV prevalence of 22%. This includes the vast majority of East Asian countries.

In the HBV care continuum, identifying patients and arranging linkage to care is only the first step. Long-term retention of patients is critical, especially since with disease progression, treatment eligibility rates can increase by 30% after 3 years of follow-up. Nonetheless, there has been a paucity of data on HBV care continuum retention rates after referrai and linkage. A US-based study did found that among diagnosed patients, only 63.2% achieved linkage to referral, and only 44.1% remained retained in clinical care after at least three clinic visits. Another study in Italy found a higher retention of 60% after 5 years; besides African ethnicity and concomitant HIV infection, the study failed to identify any predictors of retention failure, yet 74.8% of retained patients subsequently required treatment. There has been otherwise no published data on linkage to retention rates in endemic regions including East Asia, and on whether the care continuum cascade can successfully link referral to treatment.

Our center previously conducted a territory-wide prevalence study of HBV, and out of \>10,000 screened participants, the investigators identified 803 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBSAg)-positive individuals, with a mean age of 53.7 (135.8) years (36.7% male). As part of linkage to care, all patients were subsequently referred to their respective geographical cluster hospital. The investigators recently performed a follow-up telephone survey of the 803 patients, asking on their status of clinical follow-up and liver-related treatment. Our preliminary data found a retention rate of only 37.1% after 2 years post-referral. However, among retained patients, 51.2% were already started on anti-HBV treatment, suggesting that high rates of treatment eligibility may also exist in unretained patients. Hence, to enhance linkage to treatment, linkage to retention rates will need improvement.

There is emerging evidence on the effect of different interventions in improving the care continuum of viral hepatitis, although the majority of evidence is concentrated in hepatitis C virus and not HBV. Clinical reminders have been demonstrated to be the most effective method to improve testing rates; such reminders may also be useful to in improving clinic attendance and retention. On the other hand, the data on educational materials is less consistent. Data was concentrated in Asian migrants in North America, with some based on non-randomized studies, and could be susceptible to selection, attrition and reporting bias.

Interventions using social media and mobile technology may be promising. Experience from engaging patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection have found social media effective in reaching out to marginalized individuals, especially among those of a younger age. It would be interesting to see if educational videos disseminated on mobile devices via social media can improve linkage to retention and treatment for HBV.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis B, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Receiving an educational intervention

Receiving the educational video link on their mobile device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Receiving an educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient not receiving any educational intervention

No educational intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Receiving an educational intervention

Patient not receiving any educational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

No educational intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CHB (HBV DNA+ or HBsAg+ for more than 6 months)
* Age \>18
* Treatment naive at initial presentation

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior HBV treatment
* Organ transplant or other immunosuppression
* HIV, HDV, HCV co-infection
* Decompensated or HCC patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wai-Kay Seto

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Medicine and Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HBVcare

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.