Research of the Application of Pancreatic Cancer Screening Artificial Intelligence Model "PANDAPro"
NCT ID: NCT06643715
Last Updated: 2025-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
82536 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Research of the Application of Artificial Intelligence Model "PANDA"
NCT06528223
AI-powered Early Detection for Pancreatic Cancer Via Non-contrast CT in Opportunistic Screening Cohort
NCT06638866
Artificial Intelligence in EUS for Diagnosing Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT05476978
Artificial Intelligence-powered Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Screening of Pancreatic Cancer
NCT07117045
Validation of Joint-AI in Diagnosing Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT06753318
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the second round of real-world validation, patients with non-contrast CT scans from March 1, 2024, to August 1, 2024, are expected to be enrolled. The enrolled patients will be categorized into three groups: nonPDAC, PDAC, and normal. The results will be compared with imaging report findings. Patients with PANDA Pro-reported PDAC positivity but no pancreatic lesions indicated in the imaging report, or those with positive pancreatic findings in the imaging report but no subsequent clinical intervention, will be identified as requiring follow-up. These patients will be recalled to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University for further examination and diagnosis. Among them, patients with secondary examination confirming PDAC positivity will undergo standard clinical procedures such as MDT at the hospital, ultimately tracking their treatment to confirm ground truth. For patients with secondary examination indicating PDAC negativity, a preliminary determination of their true status will be made after a small-scale discussion between hepatobiliary surgeons and radiologists. Those judged as false positives will undergo follow-up for up to two years to determine their outcomes, thereby validating the sensitivity and specificity of the PANDA Pro model. For patients with PANDA Pro-reported nonPDAC positivity but no positive pancreatic findings in the imaging report, hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgeons and radiologists will retrospectively review the images to confirm their true status. For patients with PANDA Pro-reported normal results but imaging reports indicating pancreatic lesions, a secondary review by surgeons will be conducted to determine whether it is a false negative by PANDA Pro.
For patients reported as true positives for PDAC by the PANDA Pro model, medical records (including tumor marker levels, patient symptoms, resectability classification, TNM staging, etc.) will be collected. These will be compared with corresponding indicators from PDAC patients identified through the SOC(Standard Order of Clinic) during the same period, to validate PANDA Pro's ability to detect and identify lesions in the early stages of pancreatic cancer development.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The upgraded PANDA Pro model has improved upon the original PANDA model by enhancing its ability to differentiate between pancreatitis, pancreatic cystic lesions, and eliminating interference from adjacent organs such as the common bile duct and duodenum. These advancements have effectively increased the model's clinical utility, making it more reliable for real-world applications in diagnosing pancreatic conditions.
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PANDA Pro
recall of clinically missed but PANDA Pro detected pancreatic lesions
PANDA Pro
Patients with PANDA Pro-reported PDAC positivity but no pancreatic lesions indicated in the imaging report, or those with positive pancreatic findings in the imaging report but no subsequent clinical intervention, will be identified as requiring follow-up. These patients will be recalled to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University for further examination and diagnosis.
Tradition
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PANDA Pro
Patients with PANDA Pro-reported PDAC positivity but no pancreatic lesions indicated in the imaging report, or those with positive pancreatic findings in the imaging report but no subsequent clinical intervention, will be identified as requiring follow-up. These patients will be recalled to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University for further examination and diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age at the time of the scan between 18-90 years old, with no restriction on gender;
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-contrast CT scans performed in emergency settings;
* Patients who have undergone thoracic/abdominal surgeries affecting or altering the anatomical display of the pancreas (e.g., post-esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, vascular surgeries, or post-ERCP);
* Non-standard scans (e.g., hands placed on either side of the body or abdomen, severe respiratory motion artifacts, perfusion contamination, etc.);
* CT scans ordered by hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons or oncologists;
* Patients referred to a higher-level hospital due to a pancreatic mass found during local hospital examination;
* Patients who, for personal reasons, did not follow up with pancreatic cancer diagnosis or treatment at the hospital, or were lost to follow-up midway;
* Patients with concurrent malignancies in other locations or those undergoing comprehensive cancer treatment for malignant tumors;
* Imaging reports made by radiologists without referring to AI during the image interpretation;
* Patients who underwent enhanced CT, MRI, or PET-CT examinations concurrently.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lishui Municipal Central Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
OTHER
Zhejiang University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
TingBo Liang
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZY-PANDAPro
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.