Comparison Bewteen Intraoperative HPI vs. High Mean Arterial Pressure Threshold
NCT ID: NCT06631482
Last Updated: 2025-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-16
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. In the HPI group, interventions will be initiated when the HPI value exceeds 85. These interventions will follow a protocol that includes fluid administration, norepinephrine, and dobutamine to prevent hypotension. The control group will have their alarm threshold set at 73 mmHg. For these patients, interventions will be based on stroke volume variation (SVV) and clinical judgment, utilizing fluid and norepinephrine as needed. HPI is an attractive AI-based tool for medical care, but its high cost due to advanced technology raises questions. If its accuracy proves to be similar to simply raising the alarm threshold to 73 mmHg, it may not lead to meaningful changes in clinical practice. The study aims to compare the efficacy of these two methods in reducing the incidence of IOH.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HPI Group
Use the hypotension predictive index (HPI)-guided protocol to prevent intraoperative hypotension, initiating treatmentusing the fluid administration or intravenous norepinephrine infusion to keep intraoperative HPI below 85.
Maintain HPI < 85
Protocolized treatment with fluid administration, norepinephrine, and dobutamine to prevent intraoperative hypotension. The two arms are triggered by different alarms: one from a traditional monitor with an elevated MAP threshold of 73 mmHg, and the other from an HPI threshold of 85.
73mmHg MAP Alarm Group
Intraoperative maintenance of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 73 mmHg or higher by using the fluid administration or intravenous norepinephrine infusion.
Maintain MAP>=73
Protocolized treatment with fluid administration, norepinephrine, and dobutamine to prevent intraoperative hypotension. The two arms are triggered by different alarms: one from a traditional monitor with an elevated MAP threshold of 73 mmHg, and the other from an HPI threshold of 85.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Maintain HPI < 85
Protocolized treatment with fluid administration, norepinephrine, and dobutamine to prevent intraoperative hypotension. The two arms are triggered by different alarms: one from a traditional monitor with an elevated MAP threshold of 73 mmHg, and the other from an HPI threshold of 85.
Maintain MAP>=73
Protocolized treatment with fluid administration, norepinephrine, and dobutamine to prevent intraoperative hypotension. The two arms are triggered by different alarms: one from a traditional monitor with an elevated MAP threshold of 73 mmHg, and the other from an HPI threshold of 85.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ASA Class II or higher. Estimated surgery duration of three hours or more. High cardiovascular risk, such as poorly controlled hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, or chronic emphysema.
* B: Patients aged 18 years or older.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy: Pregnant women.
* End-stage renal disease: Patients with eGFR below 30 ml/min/1.73 m².
* Cardiac shunt: Presence of intracardiac shunt.
* Severe arrhythmias: Including supraventricular tachycardia (heart rate \&amp;gt;100 bpm), ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation.
* Factors affecting SVV accuracy: Conditions such as atrial fibrillation (A-Fib) or thoracic surgery that can invalidate stroke volume variation (SVV) measurements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tsung Ta Wu, MD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu branch
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hosipital
Taipei, , Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
Taoyuan District, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mulder MP, Harmannij-Markusse M, Fresiello L, Donker DW, Potters JW. Hypotension Prediction Index Is Equally Effective in Predicting Intraoperative Hypotension during Noncardiac Surgery Compared to a Mean Arterial Pressure Threshold: A Prospective Observational Study. Anesthesiology. 2024 Sep 1;141(3):453-462. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004990.
Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):663-674. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202406137RIND
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id