Impact of Physical Activity on Immunotherapy-induced Toxicities in Melanoma Management
NCT ID: NCT06627595
Last Updated: 2024-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-11-05
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Immunotherapies are treatments that have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with melanoma. These are therapies that work by stimulating the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor response. Their toxicities are represented by immune-mediated toxicities, similar to true autoimmune diseases.
Adapted physical activity as supportive care in oncology is expanding. From a pathophysiological perspective, physical activity is thought to modulate the immune system (by reducing inflammation, restoring immune surveillance, stimulating anti-tumor responses through the induction of T cell proliferation, modulating the gut microbiota, and influencing tumor microenvironment cells, etc.).
The modulation of the immune system by physical activity may also allow us to hypothesize a modulation of the toxicities induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. We wish to study this hypothesis in patients with advanced melanoma who are candidates for immunotherapy.
Originality and Innovative Aspects:
Physical activity as supportive care in oncology has developed significantly in recent years. However, adapted physical activity (APA) is currently only offered at one center in France (CHU de Lille).
In addition to the probable impact on patients\' quality of life, if we find evidence supporting a reduction in treatment-related toxicities for melanoma through physical activity, it would be even more interesting to introduce APA at the CHU of Montpellier.
Primary and Secondary Objectives:
Primary Objective: To analyze the association between the level of physical activity (estimated by the IPAQ questionnaire) at the initiation of immunotherapy and the occurrence of adverse effects at 6 months after starting treatment in adult patients with melanoma.
Secondary Objectives:
Analyze the association between physical activity level and treatment efficacy of immunotherapy in adult melanoma patients.
Describe the quarterly evolution of patients\' general condition through measurement of WHO status and BMI.
Assess the evolution of patients\' general condition: WHO status and BMI at treatment introduction, after 3 months, and at 6 months of treatment.
Study the evolution of patients\' quality of life during their treatment based on their physical activity level, using the QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Preliminary study:
We aim to evaluate the correlation between self-reported physical activity by patients and their actual physical activity. To obtain an objective measurement of patients\' physical activity level, we plan to work with the CARTIGEN platform and offer a small number of included patients (maximum of 50) to wear wrist actimeters for one week before treatment initiation. We will then analyze these data to determine patients\' baseline physical activity levels and compare them with the data collected via questionnaires.
This is a prospective cohort study within the context of analytical epidemiological research. It is a bicentric study: CHRU Montpellier - Saint-Eloi Hospital and ICM Val d\'Aurelle.
Using the collected data on patients\' physical activity levels (IPAQ questionnaire), we will compare two groups: patients who experienced immuno-toxicities without physical activity versus those with moderate or high physical activity.
We will also analyze treatment efficacy in these two groups, patients\' quality of life, and the evolution of their general condition.
Procedure:
Inclusion is planned at day 0 (D0), with physical activity (IPAQ3) and quality of life (QLQ-C30) questionnaires, along with clinical and oncological evaluation.
A follow-up visit at month 3 (M3) will include reassessment of clinical and oncological status, followed by another visit at month 6 (M6) for further clinical, oncological, physical activity, and quality of life reassessment.
The inclusion period is expected to last 18 months.
Outcomes / Perspectives:
If we consider that physical exercise may help mitigate the toxic effects of treatments-an aspect we wish to explore through this project-it would be relevant to introduce adapted physical activity (APA) sessions supervised by a specialized instructor within the Dermatology Day Hospital at the CHU of Montpellier.
Implementing APA in the context of onco-dermatology will strengthen the multidisciplinary approach of the CHU.
Collaboration between healthcare professionals, including specialized APA instructors, will foster effective care coordination.
This initiative is part of a holistic approach to patient care, integrating complementary interventions to address physical, psychological, and social needs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reducing Symptom Burden Through Physical Exercise in Melanoma Patients
NCT06985056
3-month Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Intervention for Individuals Diagnosed With Melanoma
NCT03825913
High-Intensity Exercise and High-Fiber Diet for Immunotherapy Outcomes in Melanoma Patients: The DUO Trial
NCT06298734
Optimization of the Patient Care Pathway in Immuno-oncology
NCT03329755
Predictive Clinical Features for Response to Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage II,III and IV Resected Melanoma
NCT05527795
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with no physical activity / low physical activity
Patients with low score according to the IPAQ questionnaire at baseline. This is the lowest level of physical activity.
Immunotherapy
Patients will be treated in accordance with the guidelines for melanoma treatment.
Patients with moderate to high physical activity
Patients with moderate or high score according to the IPAQ questionnaire at baseline.
Immunotherapy
Patients will be treated in accordance with the guidelines for melanoma treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Immunotherapy
Patients will be treated in accordance with the guidelines for melanoma treatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ECOG performance status inferior or equal to 3
* patient with a melanoma confirmed histologically/pathologically
* indication for initiating treatment with anti-PD1 immunotherapy or anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4
Exclusion Criteria
* inability to follow up with the patient during the study period
* refusal to participate after a reflection period
* medical contraindication to initiating immunotherapy (active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years, active infection, etc.)
* not affiliated with a social security system
* patient under legal protection, guardianship, or curatorship
* person participating in another study that includes an ongoing exclusion period
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL24_0195
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.