Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy in Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT06620198
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE4
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2027-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this double-blind randomized controlled trial with a SHAM control group is to evaluate the effects of robot-assisted therapy, integrated with conventional therapy, on upper limb motor recovery in patients with GBS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Immunoadsorption Versus Plasma Exchange for Treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
NCT04871035
Efficacy and Safety of Pozelimab and Cemdisiran Combination Therapy in Patients With Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis
NCT06479863
Prospective Study on Swallowing/Breathing Interactions in Severe Guillain Barre Syndrome.
NCT01024088
Study of the Effectiveness of Intravenous Immune Globulin (10%) for the Treatment of Multifocal Motor Neuropathy
NCT00666263
InertiaLocoGraphy as a Biomarker of Immunoglobulin Therapy Efficacy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
NCT04529291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active-assisted therapy with an upper limb robotic exoskeleton
Patients will receive upper limb neurorehabilitation training using a robotic exoskeleton administered by the therapist. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. The computer-robot interface is designed to offer various exergames that require specific upper limb movements.
All movements performed by the patient using the exoskeleton will provide immediate audiovisual feedback on the computer screen. The training will consist of 20 sessions, with five 45-minute sessions per week.
Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Active Rehabilitation with Feedback and Exercise Gaming
Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minutes each with an exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. Each session will include exercises designed to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and enhance hand coordination. The training parameters, such as difficulty level, duration, and visual stimuli, will be adjusted based on the patient's residual abilities. The selected exercises may involve movements of a single joint along one axis, combined movements of a single joint around 2 or 3 axes, selective exercises for the opening and closing hand, or multi-joint exercises. All exercises will be realized with audiovisual feedback.
Passive mobilization with an upper limb robotic exoskeleton
Patients will undergo a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist.
Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Passive Mobilization without Feedback
Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minute of a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist. This will involve passive mobilization using the exoskeleton for the upper limb, without any audiovisual feedback. They will not realize any active movement during the training.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Active Rehabilitation with Feedback and Exercise Gaming
Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minutes each with an exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. Each session will include exercises designed to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and enhance hand coordination. The training parameters, such as difficulty level, duration, and visual stimuli, will be adjusted based on the patient's residual abilities. The selected exercises may involve movements of a single joint along one axis, combined movements of a single joint around 2 or 3 axes, selective exercises for the opening and closing hand, or multi-joint exercises. All exercises will be realized with audiovisual feedback.
Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Passive Mobilization without Feedback
Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minute of a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist. This will involve passive mobilization using the exoskeleton for the upper limb, without any audiovisual feedback. They will not realize any active movement during the training.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. UL motor impairment (0-4 in the Medical Research Council scale);
3. sub-acute phase (until 180 days);
4. Patients able to maintain the sitting position.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cognitive impairment assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination (score under 24 points);
3. Visual deficit;
4. Hearing disorders.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alex Martino Cinnera, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Diego Piatti, BSc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Laura Casagrande Conti, MSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Martina D Arienzo, BSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Rome, Lazio, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
110SL24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.