Toward Personalized Medicine to Guide Drug Withdrawal in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Clinical Remission

NCT ID: NCT06618937

Last Updated: 2024-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

166 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2029-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Biologic therapies made clinical remission an achievable goal for most juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Nevertheless, antirheumatic drugs have side effects and are costly. Currently, no guidelines exist for withdrawing drugs in JIA patients with clinical inactive disease (CID). Relapses following the withdrawal of antirheumatic drugs are common. To establish an optimal timeline for treatment discontinuation is a major unmet need in pediatric rheumatology.

It is hypothesized that biomarkers-guided early withdrawal of antirheumatic drugs in patients achieving clinical, imaging and biological remission is safe and more effective compared to the standard practice of maintenance of stable treatment over 12 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is designed as a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open label superiority trial of two different treatment medication withdrawal strategies (early biomarkers-guided versus conventional unguided drugs withdrawal strategy). Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) and serum biomarkers, such as the S-100 protein family, allow a more accurate assessment of remission status than clinical evaluation alone. Subclinical synovitis detected by MSUS at the joint level and increased level of S100 proteins have been associated with an increased risk of loss of clinically inactive disease after drug discontinuation. The results of this study will provide a more rational approach to treatment withdrawal in inactive JIA patients. It is expected that a risk-adapted strategy would reduce both number of disease flares and cumulative drug exposure compared with standard-of-care practice. If validated, these biomarkers will help to personalize immunosuppressant withdrawal: a therapy paradigm shift while ensuring patient and economic benefits.

Patients with inactive disease, absence of sublinical synovitis at the joint level and normal S100A8/9 and hs-CRP leves will be randomly assigned to either an early biomarker-guided drug withdrawal protocol (interventional arm) or continuation of ongoing therapy at unchanged dose for an additional 6 months and then gradual tapering (control arm).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline, then every 3 months if still on treatment and every 6 months after drug withdrawal. At each timepoint the following procedures will be performed: joint assessment, Physician's Global Assessment of Overall Disease Activity, JAMAR, Uveitis assessment (in ANA positive patients), Hematology, chemistry, CRP, ESR, urine analysis according to drug specific schedule and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Drug Adverse Events will be collected (MedDRA).

MSUS and serum biomarkers quantification (S100A8/9, hs-CRP) will be repeated every 3 months until month 18 in patients with subclinical synovitis and pathologic values of serum biomarkers who are randomized in the intervention arm.

Blood samples for research laboratory analysis (multi Omics, characterization of immune cell populations and quantification of cytokines concentration and EV-miRNAs expression) will be collected at baseline, at drugs withdrawal and in case of disease flare.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biomarker-guided drug withdrawal

Patients with inactive disease, absence of sublinical synovitis at the joint level and normal S100A8/9 and hs-CRP leves will be randomly assigned to either an early biomarker-guided drug withdrawal protocol (interventional arm) or continuation of ongoing therapy at unchanged dose for an additional 6 months and then gradual tapering (control arm).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline, then every 3 months if still on treatment and every 6 months after drug withdrawal. At each timepoint the following procedures will be performed: joint assessment, Physician's Global Assessment of Overall Disease Activity, JAMAR, Uveitis assessment (in ANA positive patients), Hematology, chemistry, CRP, ESR, urine analysis according to drug specific schedule and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Drug Adverse Events will be collected (MedDRA).

MSUS and serum biomarkers quantification (S100A8/9, hs-CRP) will be repeated every 3 months until month 18 in patients with subclinical synovitis and pathologic values

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment medication withdrawal strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

The study aims to compare early biomarkers-guided versus conventional unguided drugs withdrawal strategy.

Gradual tapering

The control arm will continue ongoing therapy at unchanged dose for an additional 6 months and then will gradually taper the therapy.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment medication withdrawal strategy

The study aims to compare early biomarkers-guided versus conventional unguided drugs withdrawal strategy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \- Children with a diagnosis of JIA according to the ILAR classification criteria
* JIA patients who satisfy criteria for inactive disease for a minimum of 6 continuous months while still taking medication.
* Patients who have been treated with cs/b/bs/ts DMARDs according to the label indication
* Ability to comply with the entire study procedures, ability to communicate meaningfully with the investigational staff, competence to give written informed consent; to be applied to the parents and/or patients, as appropriate
* Duly executed, written, informed consent obtained from the patient's parents/legal guardian
* Female of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at the beginning of the trial. If sexually active, they must have no intention of conceiving while on treatment with antirheumatic drugs.

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Patients with systemic JIA according to ILAR criteria
* Patients with undifferentiated arthritis according to ILAR criteria
* Patients with severe disease-related ocular damage and who need systemic treatment for uveitis
* Patients who received glucocorticoid treatment 3 months prior to baseline visit
* Patients who had previously unsuccessfully attempted tapering cs/b/bs/tsDMARDs
* Patients with severe damage as per caring physician measured
* Prior or current history of other significant concomitant illness(es) that, according to the Investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the patient's participation in the study
* Any other medical condition or laboratory examination which in the opinion of the caring physician should exclude the patient from participation to the study
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istituto Giannina Gaslini

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolino Ruperto, MD, MPH

Trial Centre Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istituto Giannina Gaslini

Genoa, GE, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Clara Malattia, MD

Role: CONTACT

0039 01056362843

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Clara Malattia, MD

Role: primary

0039 010 56362843

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-514732-24-00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.