Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the SpheriKA® (MEDACTA) and Origin® (SYMBIOS) Prostheses During Total Knee Replacement Using the Kinematic Alignment Technique

NCT ID: NCT06603103

Last Updated: 2024-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-03

Study Completion Date

2028-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The traditional technique for implanting a total knee prosthesis, known as mechanical alignment, does not aim to preserve the original anatomy and laxity of the knee. Instead, the implants are "systematically" aligned to create a non-naturally straight lower limb. Respectively 20% and 50% of patients with a mechanically aligned total knee prosthesis are dissatisfied with the result, and complain of residual symptoms. A newer, more physiological technique for implanting a total knee prosthesis, known as kinematic alignment, aims to recreate the unique native anatomy and laxity of each patient\'s knee. The kinematic alignment technique has been shown to reduce the risk of residual symptoms and thus improve the patient\'s experience of his or her prosthetic knee. As a result of the emergence of the kinematic alignment technique, two manufacturers have developed total knee prosthesis implants specifically for this new insertion technique. A "made-to-measure" total knee prosthesis (ORIGIN® - Symbios, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland) was developed with the aim of reproducing the unique contour of each implanted knee. Another manufacturer opted to develop a generic total knee prosthesis implant (SPHERIKA® - Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland), but with a design optimized for the kinematic alignment technique. These two models of total knee prosthesis each offer advantages and limitations that need to be assessed. The main aim of this study is therefore to compare the joint perception of these 2 prostheses. It will also look at the clinical and imaging results, the biomechanics of the prosthetic knee during gait, and the muscular strength of knee extension, obtained for these 2 total knee prostheses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment and SPHERIKA prosthesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SPHERIKA prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignement with SPHERIKA prosthesis

total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment and ORIGIN prosthesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ORIGIN prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignement with ORIGIN prosthesis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SPHERIKA prosthesis

total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignement with SPHERIKA prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ORIGIN prosthesis

total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignement with ORIGIN prosthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with indication for initial total knee replacement
* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
* Patient informed of the study and formally included (informed consent signed) before the first research examination.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with complex osteoarthritis (e.g. bone loss, history of patellar instability)
* Patient with contralateral knee prosthesis
* Patient with symptomatic osteoarthritis (stiffness and/or pain) of a hip or contralateral knee
* Patient with another condition (acquired pathology) of the lower limbs and/or nervous system that may significantly affect gait quality
* Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision,
* Patient of legal age under legal protection or unable to express consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique du Sport

Mérignac, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Charles Rivière, MD

Role: CONTACT

+335 56 46 32 33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Charles Rivière, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-21-SBM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physica TT Tibial Plate Prospective Study
NCT06830603 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Physica CR and Physica PS Clinical Trial
NCT02766231 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING