A Study to Evaluate Real World Outcomes of the enVista® Aspire (EA) and Aspire Toric (ETA) Intraocular Lens in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction

NCT ID: NCT06594185

Last Updated: 2025-07-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

335 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-29

Study Completion Date

2025-05-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A study to evaluate the real-world clinical performance of the enVista Aspire and Aspire Toric intraocular lens (IOL) models EA and ETA and to assess surgeon and subject satisfaction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Subjects bilaterally implanted with enVista Aspire EA or Aspire Toric ETA IOLs

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

enVista Aspire EA or Aspire Toric ETA IOLs

Intervention Type DEVICE

enVista Aspire EA or Aspire Toric ETA IOLs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

enVista Aspire EA or Aspire Toric ETA IOLs

enVista Aspire EA or Aspire Toric ETA IOLs

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 22 years of age or older on the date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed.
2. Subjects must be capable of understanding and providing informed consent on the Institutional Review Board (IRB)- approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) and authorization as appropriate for local privacy regulations.
3. Have a BCDVA at or worse than 20/40 in each eye, with or without a glare source, due to a clinically significant cataract (cortical, nuclear, subcapsular, or combination) that is considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction and capsular IOL implantation.
4. Have a BCDVA projected to be better than 20/30 after IOL implantation in each eye as determined by the medical judgment of the Principal Investigator.
5. Subjects must have clear intraocular media other than the cataract in both eyes.
6. Subjects must require an IOL power from +6.0 diopter (D) to +34.0 diopter (D) in both eyes.
7. Subjects with clinically significant preoperative corneal astigmatism must require an IOL toric power between 1.25 diopter (D) to 5.75 diopter (D).
8. Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all treatment and follow-up Clinical Investigation visits and procedures

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pre-existing ocular conditions (subjects with prior corneal refractive surgery, irregular corneal astigmatism, severe (clinically significant) corneal dystrophy, e.g., Fuch's, macular disease, optic nerve atrophy, corneal endothelial disease, abnormal cornea, macular degeneration, retinal degeneration, and chronic drug miosis, who may not achieve the visual acuity of patients without such problems, etc.)
2. Associated ocular conditions that could affect the stability of the IOL (e.g., traumaticzonulolysis, zonular dialysis, evident zonular weakness or dehiscence, etc.) in the study eye.
3. Retinal conditions, or predisposition to retinal conditions, previous history of, or a predisposition to, retinal detachment or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, in which future treatment may be compromised by implanting this IOL
4. Amblyopia
5. Rubella, congenital, traumatic, or complicated cataracts
6. Extremely shallow anterior chamber, not due to swollen cataract
7. Recurrent anterior or posterior segment inflammation of unknown etiology, or any disease producing an inflammatory reaction (e.g., iritis or uveitis)
8. Aniridia
9. Iris neovascularization
10. Subjects who have uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye. Uncontrolled glaucoma is defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 mm Hg in spite of maximally tolerated medications (with more than three topical drugs for IOP control).
11. Microphthalmos or macrophthalmos
12. Previous corneal transplant, prior YAG laser iridotomy, YAG vitreolysis, and prior phakic IOL insertions.
13. Pre-existing ocular conditions that may negatively impact the stability of the implant or intraoperative conditions (posterior capsular rupture, complications in which the IOL stability could be compromised, inability to place IOL in capsular bag, etc.).
14. Mechanical or surgical manipulation required to enlarge the pupil
15. Vitreous loss (significant)
16. Anterior chamber bleeding (significant)
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site 118

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site 154

Bullhead City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site 137

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site 136

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site 162

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site 105

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site 104

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Site 101

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Site 151

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

Site 111

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site 126

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site 149

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Site 155

Murrieta, California, United States

Site Status

Site 109

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site 112

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Site 144

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Site 119

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Site 115

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Site 161

Greenwich, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site 130

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site 164

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site 125

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 148

Mt. Dora, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 143

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 127

Tarpon Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 153

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site134

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site 165

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site 163

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Site 160

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Site 108

Rock Island, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Site 133

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Site 131

Birmingham, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Site 121

Alexandria, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Site 142

Alexandria, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Site 102

Bloomington, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Site 106

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Site 128

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Site 117

South Sioux City, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Site 114

South Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Site 159

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Site132

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Site 138

Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 156

Leland, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 107

West Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Site 103

Brecksville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site 129

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site 166

Moore, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Site 152

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Site 135

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Site 150

Allenwood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site 140

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site 157

Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site 145

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 158

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 113

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 110

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 147

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 141

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 123

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 124

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 122

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BL-SU01-ASRWE-4401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.