Evaluation of the Vittel Criteria for Pre-hospital Triage of Severe Trauma Patients in the French West Indies and in French Guiana
NCT ID: NCT06580262
Last Updated: 2024-08-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
700 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-10-31
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Vittel criteria constitute a decision-making algorithm of 24 criteria for triage of trauma patients. The presence of only one criterion out of the 24 must direct the patient to a trauma referral center. The existence of only one trauma referral center per territory questions the relevance of using the Vittel criteria in the French Antilles and Guiana.
It therefore seems important that the relevance of the different Vittel criteria be reassessed in our territories, where the typology of patients and the urban network is different compared to that of mainland France. are a common cause of severe trauma, followed by assaults or fights, accidents at work, during leisure or at home, falls from a great height, and weapon-related injuries. Special and rapid care is then necessary.
This is why trauma severity criteria and triage scores are used to target these serious patients and direct them to the appropriate healthcare facilities.
The Vittel criteria constitute a decision-making algorithm of 24 criteria for triage of trauma patients. The presence of only one criterion out of the 24 must direct the patient to a trauma referral center. The existence of only one trauma referral center per territory questions the relevance of using the Vittel criteria in the French Antilles and Guiana.
It therefore seems important that the relevance of the different Vittel criteria be reassessed in Martinique, Guadeloupe and french Guiana, french overseas territories, where the typology of patients and the urban network is different compared to that of mainland France.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the French Antilles-Guiana inter-region, trauma from accidents on public roads and assaults with knives or firearms are a very common reason for interventions by SMUR teams. Despite this frequency, knowledge of the local epidemiology of these injuries is patchy. Furthermore, the referral of patients treated in pre-hospital care, either by firefighter teams or by the SMUR, is almost always done to the only reference health facility in each of the three French departments (Martinique, Guadeloupe, Guiana). The existence of only one trauma reference center per territory questions the relevance of using the Vittel criteria in the French Antilles-Guyana.
Twenty years after the development of the Vittel criteria, several changes have occurred in society, particularly in road safety and personal protective equipment. These advances would result in a reduction in the risks and severity related to accidents. Despite all these security advances, there is a lack of use and respect for them in the territories of the Antilles-Guiana. At the same time, violence and assaults by weapon have evolved with the use of firearms and weapons of war relatively frequently in our territories.
The relevance of the various Vittel criteria must be reassessed, particularly in the Antilles-Guyana where the typology of patients and the urban network is different from that of mainland France. The hypotheses are that certain criteria such as age, comorbidities, speed and deformation of vehicles, taken in isolation, would not be prognostic criteria for a serious anatomical injury or intensive care or even early mortality. Conversely, other criteria such as the taking of toxics or two-wheeled road accidents would be more important criteria to take into consideration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients suspected of severe trauma treated in the emergency departments
Patients suspected of severe trauma defined as trauma likely to have caused multiple injuries and/or threatening the vital or functional prognosis.
Routine care
The investigator takes care of the patient according to the protocol in force in his department and decides on the final orientation of the patient (transfer to intensive care unit/ICU, hospitalization or home discharge).
No recommendations or instructions are given to the investigators. Each investigator is free to decide on his care and the terms of transfer, hospitalization and discharge.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Routine care
The investigator takes care of the patient according to the protocol in force in his department and decides on the final orientation of the patient (transfer to intensive care unit/ICU, hospitalization or home discharge).
No recommendations or instructions are given to the investigators. Each investigator is free to decide on his care and the terms of transfer, hospitalization and discharge.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients treated in the emergency units of the hospitals participating in the study, whether they were brought by a SAMU/SMUR team, by a rescue and victim assistance vehicle or arrived directly.
* Patients suspected of severe trauma, defined as trauma likely to have caused multiple injuries and/or threatening the vital or functional prognosis.
* Patient if he is able to, or representative of the patient in case of incapacity, having given his agreement for the use of his medical data for this research.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Center of Martinique
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Papa Gueye, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Center of Martinique
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital of Cayenne
Cayenne, French Guiana, France
University Hospital Center of Guadeloupe
Pointe à Pitre, Guadeloupe, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Alexis Fremery, MD
Role: primary
Patrick Portecop, PhD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22_RIPH3-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id