Using Simplified Meal Boluses Versus Carbohydrate Counting in Adolescents With Hybrid Closed Loop Systems

NCT ID: NCT06575790

Last Updated: 2024-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-25

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this trial is to evaluate blood sugar control in patients with type 1 diabetes when using a simple meal bolus strategy (small, medium, large meals) compared to carbohydrate counting when on a hybrid closed loop system. The main question it aims to answer are:

What is the blood sugar time in range when using simple meal boluses versus carbohydrate counting?

Participants will:

Use the simple meal bolus plan for 4 weeks. Do precise carbohydrate counting for 4 weeks. Provide their continuous glucose monitor and pump data Take surveys about the experience of meal bolusing during the study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized crossover trial in adolescents and adults on HCL systems at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes (BDC) with the objective of testing a new simple meal bolus strategy that would not require carbohydrate counting. Given the clear benefit of HCL systems on glycemic control, the ability to use an alternative meal bolus strategy may make HCL systems more accessible. This is a fixed dose of insulin given at meals for small, medium, or large meals that would eliminate the need for precise carbohydrate counting and increase access to patients with low numeracy or difficulty with carbohydrate counting. Although HCL systems cannot yet provide automatic meal bolus insulin, such systems can minimize hyperglycemia through basal modulation and automated correction dosing and should be able to mitigate some of the impact of non-precise carbohydrate coverage. The systems can also help prevent hypoglycemia through basal modulation and pausing insulin delivery. This study will evaluate glycemic control while using the simple meal bolus strategy as compared to traditional precise carbohydrate counting in addition to assessing feasibility, acceptability, and impact on meal-related diabetes burden of each meal bolus strategy.

The proposed study will be a prospective, randomized crossover trial at a single site. Study participants will be randomized via REDCap 1:1 to Group A or Group B with plan for up to a max of 60 total participants to account for drop-out. Neither the participants nor the investigators will be blinded to group assignments due to the nature of the study.

After enrollment, groups will have a 2-week run-in period of usual care. At the first study visit, patients will upload their pump/CGM data, take pre-study surveys, and review carbohydrate counting or simple meal boluses. Pump settings may be adjusted per provider discretion and typical clinical care. Both groups will be instructed to use their systems as they typically would for 4 weeks with the exception of what is entered for carbohydrates for meal boluses. Group B will enter the precise carbohydrate count to the best of their ability, while the Group A will be instructed to enter an assigned number of carbohydrates based on if the meal is small, medium, or large. Participants will have a follow-up visit (in-person, virtual, or by phone) after 4 weeks to provide pump and CGM data, adjust insulin dosing as needed, and review the new strategy. They will have 1 week of usual care as a wash-out period followed by 4 weeks using the opposite strategy. Participants will have a final study visit to upload data and take post-study surveys.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Simple Meal Bolusing

Participants will be instructed to enter a set number of carbohydrates before meals based on if they are having a small, medium, or large meal. The preset numbers for meals will be based on their average total daily dose (TDD) determined during the 2-week usual care observation period. The participants will have their insulin to carbohydrate ratios set based on the standard formula of 450/TDD for all meals initially (e.g. a child with a TDD of 50 u/day would have 450/50=9 so an I:C of 1:9). They enter a carbohydrate amount of 30 g for small meals, 60 g for regular meals, and 90 g for large meals.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simple Meal Bolusing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will enter pre-determined numbers for small, medium, or large carbohydrate meals rather than using precise carbohydrate counting

Precise Carbohydrate counting

Participants will be instructed to enter a precise carbohydrate count before meals to the best of their ability. Pump settings may be adjusted per provider discretion and typical clinical care during this time period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carbohydrate counting

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to enter accurate carbohydrate counts to the best of their ability for all meals and snacks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simple Meal Bolusing

Participants will enter pre-determined numbers for small, medium, or large carbohydrate meals rather than using precise carbohydrate counting

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Carbohydrate counting

Participants will be instructed to enter accurate carbohydrate counts to the best of their ability for all meals and snacks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of T1D of at least 1 year duration
* Using a commercial HCL system
* Willingness to not start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during trial
* Willingness to participate in all study procedures
* Investigator has confidence that participant can successfully operate all study devices and adhere to protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* History of \>1 severe hypoglycemic event with seizure or loss of consciousness in the last 6 months or \>1 DKA event in the last 6 months not related to illness or infusion set failure
* History of chronic renal disease or currently on hemodialysis, adrenal insufficiency, hypothyroidism that is not adequately treated, use of oral or injectable steroids within the last 8 weeks, or known ongoing adhesive intolerance
* A condition, which in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would put the participant or study at risk
* Participation in another interventional trial at the time of enrollment
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

26 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barbara Davis Center

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexandra Sawyer, MD, MPH

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 303-724-2323

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexandra Sawyer, MD, MPH

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-1159

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id