Efficacy and Safety of Cytokine Adsorption and Plasma Exchange in Patients With ACLF and Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT06562803

Last Updated: 2025-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-27

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) complicated by sepsis. The focus is on assessing the impact of the cytokine adsorption column(CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on survival rates, inflammation markers, and organ function to determine its potential value in clinical practice.

The primary research questions are: (1) Does DPCAS+LPE artificial liver therapy improve the 4-week mortality rate in ACLF patients with sepsis? (2) Does it improve the 12-week mortality rate in these patients? Additionally, the study examines the effects of this therapy on APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, vasoactive-inotropic score, MELD scores, and COSSH-ACLF II scores, as well as the cytokine adsorption efficiency of the CA280.

Patients were randomly assigned to either the DPCAS+LPE group or the plasma exchange(PE) group. All patients received artificial liver therapy every other day, for a total of two sessions. Follow-up assessments were conducted before and after each therapy session, as well as at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange

30 patients in this group will receive treatment of double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE) and comprehensive internal medical treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange

Intervention Type DEVICE

Both groups received comprehensive medical treatment, including antiviral therapy, anti-infection treatment, supportive care, symptomatic treatment, and prevention of complications. Artificial liver therapy was initiated for both groups on the day of enrollment, with treatments administered every other day for a total of three sessions.

The experimental group: The first two sessions consisted of a double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE). This involved using a cytokine adsorption column (CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) and a bilirubin adsorption device (BS330,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on the same treatment circuit. DPCAS treatment was performed first, with an adsorption volume of 4500ml to 5000ml over 2 to 3 hours, followed by plasma exchange (PE), with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin being infused. The third treatment was plasma exchange, with the same dosing as in the control group.

Plasma exchange

30 patients in this group will receive treatment of plasma exchange(PE) and comprehensive internal medical treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

plasma exchange

Intervention Type OTHER

Based on comprehensive medical treatment, the control group received plasma exchange(PE) treatment, where whole blood was processed through a plasma separator (MICROPLAS MPS 07, BELLCO S.R.L., Italy), with a portion of the plasma discarded and replaced with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin.Three sessions of plasma exchange (PE) performed every other day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange

Both groups received comprehensive medical treatment, including antiviral therapy, anti-infection treatment, supportive care, symptomatic treatment, and prevention of complications. Artificial liver therapy was initiated for both groups on the day of enrollment, with treatments administered every other day for a total of three sessions.

The experimental group: The first two sessions consisted of a double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE). This involved using a cytokine adsorption column (CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) and a bilirubin adsorption device (BS330,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on the same treatment circuit. DPCAS treatment was performed first, with an adsorption volume of 4500ml to 5000ml over 2 to 3 hours, followed by plasma exchange (PE), with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin being infused. The third treatment was plasma exchange, with the same dosing as in the control group.

Intervention Type DEVICE

plasma exchange

Based on comprehensive medical treatment, the control group received plasma exchange(PE) treatment, where whole blood was processed through a plasma separator (MICROPLAS MPS 07, BELLCO S.R.L., Italy), with a portion of the plasma discarded and replaced with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin.Three sessions of plasma exchange (PE) performed every other day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 and 65 years.
2. Total bilirubin (TBIL) \> 12 mg/dL, 3.5\>INR ≥ 1.5.
3. Meets the diagnostic criteria for sepsis 3.0: confirmed or suspected infection with an increase in SOFA score by ≥ 2 points.
4. High inflammatory state: IL-6 \> 80 pg/ml.
5. Onset of sepsis within the past 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of genetic metabolic liver disease.
2. Patients with liver malignancies or other concurrent cancers.
3. Pregnancy or lactation.
4. Patients with HIV infection or other immunodeficiency diseases.
5. Patients with autoimmune diseases, recent cardiovascular events leading to unstable infarction, or a history of organ transplantation.
6. End-stage organ failure:

End-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage pulmonary heart disease, brain death, or persistent vegetative state, Grade IV hepatic encephalopathy.

End-stage renal disease or acute renal failure requiring CRRT. Inability to maintain a mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg despite adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, and steroid therapy.
7. Platelet count \< 50×10⁹/L, severe coagulopathy, or active bleeding.
8. Allergic reactions to extracorporeal circulation, hemoperfusion substances, or history of severe allergies.
9. Inability to comply with study protocols or refusal to sign the informed consent form.
10. Inability to attend regular follow-up visits according to the study schedule.
11. Any other conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, make the patient unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Liang Peng

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Liang Peng, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Liang Peng, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8613533978874

Wenxiong Xu, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8613760783281

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Liang Peng, Doctor

Role: primary

+8613533978874

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PL18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id