Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Breast Cancer Treatment
NCT ID: NCT06545045
Last Updated: 2024-12-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-31
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metacognitive strategy training (MCST)
Each MCST session will be follow the procedures of Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) intervention. There will be 10, 45-minute, weekly sessions. All sessions will be delivered in-person with a trained occupational therapist.
Metacognitive Strategy Training (MCST)
The MCST group will follow procedures for the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance intervention. First, five functional, everyday life goals are identified collaboratively by the participant and interventionist. In the second meeting, the therapist introduces the approach to the subject and teach a global cognitive strategy (i.e., GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK). In all subsequent sessions, this strategy is used as the main problem-solving framework to facilitate skill acquisition. The subject identifies a GOAL, and then is guided by the therapist to discover a PLAN to potentially achieve the goal. The subject is then asked to DO the plan (if feasible during the therapy session otherwise asked to complete at home prior to the next treatment session), and subsequently to CHECK to see if the plan worked, i.e. the goal was achieved. This process is repeated until satisfactory performance is met for each established goal.
Inactive Control Group
Participants will receive a weekly phone call from study staff to maintain contact and monitor changes in activity.
Inactive Control Group
Weekly contact will be made via telephone call to (1) maintain study engagement, (2) introduce weekly social contact with researchers, mimicking some of the potential incidental effects of the experimental group, and (3) ascertain what, if any, additional steps participants have taken to reduce cognitive symptoms. The content of each of these meetings will be tracked in intervention notes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metacognitive Strategy Training (MCST)
The MCST group will follow procedures for the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance intervention. First, five functional, everyday life goals are identified collaboratively by the participant and interventionist. In the second meeting, the therapist introduces the approach to the subject and teach a global cognitive strategy (i.e., GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK). In all subsequent sessions, this strategy is used as the main problem-solving framework to facilitate skill acquisition. The subject identifies a GOAL, and then is guided by the therapist to discover a PLAN to potentially achieve the goal. The subject is then asked to DO the plan (if feasible during the therapy session otherwise asked to complete at home prior to the next treatment session), and subsequently to CHECK to see if the plan worked, i.e. the goal was achieved. This process is repeated until satisfactory performance is met for each established goal.
Inactive Control Group
Weekly contact will be made via telephone call to (1) maintain study engagement, (2) introduce weekly social contact with researchers, mimicking some of the potential incidental effects of the experimental group, and (3) ascertain what, if any, additional steps participants have taken to reduce cognitive symptoms. The content of each of these meetings will be tracked in intervention notes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* completed treatment for active cancer diagnosis (invasive ductal or lobular BrCA Stages I, II, or III) at least 6 months but not greater than 3 years prior to participation
* able to read, write, and speak English fluently
* able to provide valid informed consent
* have a life expectancy of greater than 6 months at time of enrollment
* on stable doses (i.e., no changes in past 90 days) of medications that are known to impact cognitive function (i.e., anti-depressants)
Exclusion Criteria
* active diagnoses of any acute or chronic brain-related neurological conditions that can alter normal brain anatomy or function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, dementia, cerebral infarcts) dementia symptoms as indicated by a score of \<23 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
* severe depressive symptoms (Personal Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥21)
* history of severe traumatic brain injury, prolonged loss of consciousness (e.g., coma)
* conditions contraindicated for MRI (e.g., electrical implants, pumps, claustrophobia)
* blue-yellow colorblindness
* pregnancy
20 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Missouri-Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Boone
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna E Boone, PhD, OTR/L
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Missouri Occupational Therapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Anna E Boone
Role: primary
Juliana H Earwood
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hutchinson AD, Hosking JR, Kichenadasse G, Mattiske JK, Wilson C. Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Nov;38(7):926-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
O'Farrell E, MacKenzie J, Collins B. Clearing the air: a review of our current understanding of "chemo fog". Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;15(3):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s11912-013-0307-7.
Schagen SB, Wefel JS. Chemotherapy-related changes in cognitive functioning. EJC Suppl. 2013 Sep;11(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2013.07.007. No abstract available.
Myers JS. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Aug;13(4):413-21. doi: 10.1188/09.CJON.413-421.
Janelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol. 2011 Jun;38(3):431-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014.
Wefel JS, Schagen SB. Chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):267-75. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0264-9.
Janelsins MC, Kesler SR, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancer-related cognitive impairment. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;26(1):102-13. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.864260.
Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Felicetti T, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, Herzog J, Kneipp S, Laatsch L, Morse PA. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12):1596-615. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240.
Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.
Haskins E. Cognitive Rehabilitation Manual: Translating Evidence-Based Recommendations into Practice. vol 1. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2012.
Wolf TJ, Doherty M, Kallogjeri D, Coalson RS, Nicklaus J, Ma CX, Schlaggar BL, Piccirillo J. The Feasibility of Using Metacognitive Strategy Training to Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Connectivity in Women with Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment. Oncology. 2016;91(3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000447744. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2101565
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id