Prospective Monocentric Study Evaluating the Circulating NK Cells Phenotype and the ImmunoScore® in Patients With Non Metastatic Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06536127

Last Updated: 2024-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-16

Study Completion Date

2028-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Until 2020, the standard treatment for rectal cancer was a combination of radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy based on IV or oral 5FU, with a low complete response rate.

The randomised phase 3 PRODIGE 23 trial evaluated a regimen of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy prior to neoadjuvant RTCT, with 3-year disease-free survival as the primary endpoint. Patients in the PRODIGE 23 arm had significantly better 3-year disease-free survival (76% versus 69%; p=0.034) and 3-year metastasis-free survival (79% versus 72%; p=0.017) than patients in the standard arm, and the complete histological response rate to neoadjuvant treatment (ypT0N0) doubled from 12% in the standard arm to 28% in the PRODIGE 23 arm.

The main benefit of surgical de-escalation is to improve patients' quality of life. The main obstacle to the non-surgical management of these patients with a complete response after RTCT was the impact on survival in the event of local recurrence. Habr-Gama et al. showed that the WW strategy, combined with close follow-up, resulted in excellent disease control in the event of local recurrence, with organ conservation in almost 80% of patients.

The selection of patients eligible for this non-surgical treatment (Wait and Watch WW) remains the main issue, which is why some physicians are still reluctant to adopt it.

The immune cells known to be involved in the anti-tumour response are T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and Natural Killers (NK). These cells play a crucial role in the initiation, development and progression of cancers. They are naturally considered as potential targets for immunotherapy, but also as biological markers.

In several tumour types, particularly colorectal cancers, it has been shown that a CD8+ lymphocyte infiltrate in the tumour is associated with a better prognosis. NK cells have also been studied in the circulating blood of colorectal cancer patients and have been shown to be predictive of 3-year survival. These results suggest that prognosis may depend more on the quality of the anti-tumour immune response than on clinical parameters.

The prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum is essentially estimated by TNM uicc staging. It needs to be better estimated in order to adapt treatments to the risk of relapse. The beneficial effect of the immune response developed by the patient against colorectal tumours is certainly an important area of research.

The INSERM U1183 unit is developing a technology for analysing blood NK cells and their phenotype, including those acquired by trogocytosis (WO/2016/005548). The aim of our study will be to compare the phenotype of circulating NK cells in patients with rectal cancer before, during and after treatment, and to study the relationship with relapse-free survival and the rate of complete clinical response in non-operated patients and histological response in operated patients.

A clinically applicable immunological test called 'Immunoscore®' quantifies the density of two types of immune cells in the tumour and its invasion front: total T lymphocytes (CD3+) and killer lymphocytes (cytotoxic CD8+). The aim of the international study published in The Lancet was to assess the prognostic value of the Immunoscore test in patients with colon cancer. Given the major performance of this test in colorectal cancer, researchers are currently evaluating the Immunoscore test in rectal cancer and studying its ability to predict response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. El sissy et al. reported very encouraging results on the predictive value of the test for rectal tumours in complete response after radio-chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer Non Metastatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Blood samples

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blood samples

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Nk cells and ImmunoScore

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blood samples

Nk cells and ImmunoScore

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Age ≥ 18 years

Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum

Patient with rectal cancer (cT2-4N0 or cT1-T4N+)

Patients whose planned treatment is: standardised CTRT comprising 50Gy intensity-modulated irradiation and Capecitabine with or without additional dose (contact therapy). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX or FOLFIRINOX may be given prior to RTCT.

IMRT-type radiotherapy treatment

Women of childbearing age must provide proof of effective contraception (sterilisation for you and/or your partner, transdermal, vaginal, oral, subcutaneous or injectable hormonal contraception and intrauterine devices).

Person affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme.

Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

Exclusion Criteria

Metastatic disease

Unresectable disease

History of pelvic irradiation or contraindication to pelvic irradiation

Contraindications to the administration of one of the following chemotherapy drugs: irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or 5 FU, capecitabine

Presence of an evolving concomitant neoplasia other than the following: i/ treated in situ cervical cancer, ii/ spino or basal cell skin cancer, iii/ cancer in complete remission for more than 3 years.

Psychological, social, family or geographical conditions preventing compliance with the study protocol and follow-up examinations.

Persons under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)

Persons deprived of their liberty
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Sainte Catherine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Recherche clinique

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ICAP

Avignon, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Léa Retournard, MDV

Role: CONTACT

+33490276241

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Léa RETOURNARD, MDV

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ICAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.