Mechanical Respiratory/circulatory Support in Patients with Pulmonary Thrombectomy
NCT ID: NCT06525480
Last Updated: 2024-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
77 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-22
2024-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Although anticoagulation is usually the preferred method of treatment, patients with high-risk and/or intermediate/high-risk pulmonary embolism may benefit from immediate reperfusion therapy, such as mechanical catheter thrombectomy. During this procedure, there may be an increase in pulmonary pressures caused by the introduction of pulmonary catheters, which may trigger hemodynamic instability. In addition, anesthesia performed during percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy may precipitate hemodynamic and respiratory compromise due to hypoxia, hypercapnia and increased airway pressure.
We will perform a retrospective, single-center study to determine the incidence and immediate causes of hemodynamic and/or respiratory deterioration, before, during and after (first 30 days) of percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy, as well as the need for mechanical respiratory/circulatory support.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The degree of hemodynamic compromise due to PE can be determined by imaging studies, such as computed tomography angiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Additionally, laboratory tests may suggest circulatory compromise, such as elevated levels of cardiac troponin and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at the time of PE presentation.
There are different classifications to evaluate the severity of PE and we consider the presence of hemodynamic instability to differentiate high-risk PE from intermediate-risk PE. The presence of hemodynamic instability includes a state of obstructive shock (signs of hypoperfusion associated with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90mmHg, and/or SBP ≥ 90mmHg with the need for vasoactive drugs), persistent hypotension (SBP\<90mmHg for ≥ 15 min or SBP decrease ≥ 40mmHg compared to baseline) or cardiac arrest with the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The high risk of PE also includes the existence of some parameter included in the sPESI such as: history of cancer, age over 80 years, heart rate ≥ 110 bpm, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SBP \<100 mmHg and SpO2 \<90%.
Patients with high-risk and/or intermediate/high-risk pulmonary embolism benefit from immediate reperfusion therapy, such as systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis, catheter thrombectomy or surgery. Although the incidence of complications and mortality in high-risk PE patients has been determined, the incidence and immediate causes of hemodynamic and/or respiratory deterioration before, during, and after pulmonary thrombectomy are unknown. Pulmonary thrombectomy is a technique that consists of the extraction or dissolution, using endovascular devices, of the thrombus that partially or totally obstructs a pulmonary artery. It is generally associated with the local intra-thrombus administration of thrombolytic drugs. The increase in pulmonary intravascular pressure generated during the procedure can trigger the appearance of complications (arrhythmias, acute overload of the right ventricle, hemodynamic and/or respiratory instability, shock, cardiovascular arrest). These complications usually require an increase in hemodynamic support (with an increase in vasoactive drugs) and/or respiratory support (orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation), and even mechanical support with ECMO, usually veno-arterial ECMO for cardiovascular assistance. Also, the type of anesthesia performed can precipitate the hemodynamic and/or respiratory compromise of patients due to the possible presence of hypoxia and hypercapnia in patients who present hypoventilation, and the increase in airway pressures caused by orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In some cases, the use of mechanical circulatory support, usually ECMO, may be justified; but it is currently unclear whether VA-ECMO should be initiated in all high-risk PE patients. It must be considered that VA-ECMO is associated with innumerable complications (bleeding, thrombi, vascular complications), which increase the longer the duration of support.
Determining the incidence and causes or context of the onset of hemodynamic and/or respiratory deterioration (leading to shock, need for orotracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary arrest and/or mechanical support with ECMO), before, during and after thrombectomy pulmonary disease, could help reduce the morbidity and mortality of these patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy
Pulmonary thrombus extraction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with high/intermediate risk of pulmonary embolism who undergo pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy
Exclusion Criteria
* Low-risk pulmonary embolism patients
* Patients who do not undergo pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vall d´Hebron Research Institute VHIR
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR(AG)102/202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id