PASS Pain After Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06506110

Last Updated: 2024-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

7000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-11

Study Completion Date

2025-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The numeric rating scale (NRS) is one way to assess how much pain a patient is feeling after surgery, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). The score getting lower can thus indicate pain relief. However, a small change in the score does not mean that the patient is actually satisfied with their pain relief treatment. The PASS (patient acceptable symptom state) is the score threshold beyond which a patient considers their treatment satisfactory.

The purpose of this observational study is to find out the PASS for the NRS in the first 48 hours after surgery. This will help guide future research on pain medicine, so that new techniques can deliver adequate patient satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As healthcare delivery and research studies become more patient-centered, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) - instruments completed by a patient to capture their health status (e.g., pain, quality of life, function) - are increasingly used. However little attention has been paid to PROMs in the acute phase of postoperative recovery. Given that many patients experience moderate to severe pain in the first day following surgery (e.g., 50% for joint replacement surgery), and that acute postsurgical pain is associated with long-term outcomes, a focus on patient-reported acute pain following surgery is needed.

Both acute and chronic postoperative pain are commonly assessed using the 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain) or numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain). While a reduction in the VAS or NRS pain score indicates some degree of pain relief, neither the raw numerical score nor the statistical significance of a score's change indicates whether the change is perceived by patients to be meaningful. Instead, the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), which represents the threshold beyond which patients consider themselves well or satisfied with a treatment, can be used to determine the proportion of patients that responded to treatment (i.e., the proportion of patients that achieved the PASS) and to calculate the number needed to treat. Little to no data has been found concerning the PASS for acute postsurgical pain. There has been somewhat more work quantifying the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID; the smallest change that is important to patients), which is a related concept to the PASS that also determines the clinical significance of a change in pain score. The MCID varies widely across chronic pain disorders (from 8 mm for scleroderma to 82 mm for trigeminal neuralgia) and across non-surgical acute pain conditions (from 8 mm for patients presenting to the emergency department to 40 mm for rheumatic conditions). Therefore, the PASS for acute pain following surgeries is expected to vary based on the type of surgery, but this has not been determined. Similarly, there is no known study of the consistency in PASS throughout the postoperative period or across the patient and surgical factors that are known to be important for MCID (e.g., preoperative pain, pain expectations), or the opioid dose (measured in morphine milligram equivalents) needed to achieve the PASS.

The primary objective of this study is to determine the PASS for the NRS pain score in the first 48 hours after surgery in patients who received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The study includes patients who have undergone surgery at UHN between June 4, 2022, and December 31, 2023 (the study period). Patients will be identified using the Epic data management software. All required data for this study will be obtained from the Epic electronic medical record at UHN. For patients who are on intravenous PCA, the patient's pain score at rest and with activity is taken using the NRS multiple times per day and recorded in Epic. Each time the NRS is taken, the patient's satisfaction (yes/no) is also recorded along with the cumulative PCA opioid dose.

This study will include a descriptive analysis of the data collected. The descriptive analysis will be used to summarize the characteristics of the study population and to identify patterns and trends in the data. Measures of central tendency (e.g., mean, median, mode) and measures of variability (e.g., standard deviation, range) will be calculated for continuous variables. Frequency distributions and proportions will be used to describe categorical variables. Missing data will not be imputed but will be reported for every variable. Graphs and charts will be used to visualize the data. Histograms, bar charts, and pie charts will be used to describe the distribution of continuous and categorical variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients who received intravenous PCA following surgery at the UHN

Patients who received intravenous PCA following surgery at the UHN from the period of June 4, 2022 to December 31, 2023.

Retrieving of retrospective data from Epic

Intervention Type OTHER

Retrospective data from Epic will be extracted to determine the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in the first 48 hours after surgery in patients who received intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Retrieving of retrospective data from Epic

Retrospective data from Epic will be extracted to determine the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in the first 48 hours after surgery in patients who received intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Had surgery at the UHN during the study period
* Received intravenous PCA within the first 48 hours after surgery
* Have at least 1 NRS rating and 1 satisfaction rating in the first 48 hours after surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of epidural analgesia in the first 48 hours after surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laura Giron-Arango, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UHN

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAPCR# 24-5290

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

24-5290

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id