Rehabilitation With the Shoulder Pacemaker

NCT ID: NCT06501859

Last Updated: 2025-10-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-02

Study Completion Date

2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators purpose of the proposed study is to use the FDA approved Shoulder Pacemaker device in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty and study the functional outcomes compared to a standard post-operative rehabilitation program. The investigators hypothesize that use of the Shoulder Pacemaker reduce pain and will allow for improved range of motion and function in patients undergoing RSA. The findings of this research may very well improve function in RSA patients through a novel, non-invasive approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has increased utility in recent years for shoulder conditions such as rotator cuff tear arthropathy, massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, severe glenohumeral arthritis, proximal humerus fracture, and failed shoulder arthroplasty. While RSA may commonly be the only surgical treatment for some of these conditions, the outcomes and adverse event profiles are significant. Specifically, RSA patients often complain of poor range of motion and function with the arm above the head. Despite many attempts at solving these shortcomings with new implant design iterations and improved implant positioning, these continue to be a source of frustration with patients and surgeons alike.

Poor scapulothoracic motion is associated with poor shoulder range of motion, especially after RSA. Past investigators have shown that in certain RSA patients, there is a near complete loss of glenohumeral motion and forward elevation and abduction is highly dependent on scapulothoracic motion. In a separate study, In addition, these investigators demonstrated that internal rotation after RSA is largely dependent on scapulothoracic motion. Several years ago, a device called the Shoulder Pacemaker (Alyve Medical, Denver, CO) was developed initially for the treatment of functional instability in the setting of scapular dyskinesis. It functions as a wearable muscle electrostimulator that allows for periscapular muscle stimulation as well as feedback on shoulder range of motion. The motion technology recognizes muscle movement and automatically sets the appropriate stimulation intensity according to the movement. This improves scapular muscle recruitment during range of motion. While the data is limited, there has been some early promising results for this pathology. As function after RSA is particularly reliant on scapulothoracic function, the current investigators may infer that use of the Shoulder Pacemaker device may function well in patients with reverse shoulder replacements. Specifically, the device would allow patients to train their periscapular musculature after RSA to improve global shoulder motion and function. To the current investigators knowledge, there is no current research on the use of the Shoulder Pacemaker after RSA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of care physical therapy

Control group and will not use the shoulder pacemaker, but will participate in a standardized physical therapy protocol for 3 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of care physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard rehabilitation protocol for 3 months.

Shoulder pacemaker with physical therapy

Include a standardized physical therapy protocol with utilization of the Shoulder Pacemaker device 3 times per week over a 3-month period starting at 6 weeks post-operatively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Shoulder pacemaker with physical therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standardized rehabilitation protocol with utilization of the shoulder pacemaker device 3 times per week over a 3-month period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard of care physical therapy

Standard rehabilitation protocol for 3 months.

Intervention Type OTHER

Shoulder pacemaker with physical therapy

Standardized rehabilitation protocol with utilization of the shoulder pacemaker device 3 times per week over a 3-month period.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients indicated for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty
* Surgery at University of Utah Facilities
* Patients between the ages 18-80.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior ipsilateral shoulder arthroplasty
* Inability or unwillingness to participate in the rehabilitation protocol
* Prior cardiac pacemaker or spinal cord stimulator
* Age over 80
* History of periscapular surgery
* History of ipsilateral neurologic injury
* Prisoners
* Patients requiring prolonged immobilization deviating from standard protocol
* Patients who have an implantable medical device or other electrical device.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christopher Joyce

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christopher Joyce, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah Orthopaedics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Utah Orthopedics

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

163105

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Shoulder RFA Pilot Study
NCT06039345 RECRUITING
Telerehabilitation After Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT05499728 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Driving After Shoulder Surgery
NCT04196218 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Results of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01549912 COMPLETED
Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder Data Collection
NCT03404778 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION