PillSense for Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
NCT ID: NCT06500468
Last Updated: 2024-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-18
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PillSense group
Participants in the PillSense arm will swallow one PillSense capsule. Participants who have blood detected will be admitted with a scheduled oesophagogastroduodenoscopy within 72 hours. Participants with no blood detected will be discharged with medications and a scheduled OGD within 96 hours.
PillSense System
The PillSense System consists of the PillSense Capsule, a small single use capsule that is safe for human consumption and PillSense Receiver, an external real-time monitor for data display. The PillSense Capsule is a minimally invasive, single use medical device designed to detect the presence of bleeding in the upper digestive tract, to aid with patient care. The PillSense Receiver collects and displays real-time information gathered by the PillSense Capsule within 10 minutes. The PillSense Receiver interprets the data and displays a result message "Blood detected" or "No blood detected".
Standard group
Participants randomized to the standard arm will follow standard of care and will either be admitted or discharged with medications and to undergo an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) within 72 hours if admitted or 96 hours if discharged.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PillSense System
The PillSense System consists of the PillSense Capsule, a small single use capsule that is safe for human consumption and PillSense Receiver, an external real-time monitor for data display. The PillSense Capsule is a minimally invasive, single use medical device designed to detect the presence of bleeding in the upper digestive tract, to aid with patient care. The PillSense Receiver collects and displays real-time information gathered by the PillSense Capsule within 10 minutes. The PillSense Receiver interprets the data and displays a result message "Blood detected" or "No blood detected".
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who are willing and able to comply with the study protocol (including undergoing endoscopy)
* Presented to Emergency Department with symptoms of acute overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding such as coffee ground vomiting and melena (but without melaena on physical examination)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who presented with fresh hematemesis, hematochezia and/or melaena
* Patients requiring urgent endoscopy / surgery at time of review or already planned for admission by ED physician for non UGIB related indications
* Patients who had conditions that might contraindicate the use of an ingestible capsule, such as capsule endoscopy (eg. Dysphagia, odynophagia, swallowing disorder, and/or Zenker's diverticulum, issues with the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, Crohn's disease, previous GI surgery, suspected ileus, bowel obstruction and/or perforation)
* Patients with a known history of oesophageal or gastric varices
* Patients with known UGI pathology (such as oesophageal/gastric cancer), or recent (within 3 months) upper GI ulcer bleeding, upper GI surgeries or procedures
* Patients who are on anticoagulation
* Patients with cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED)
* Patients who had altered mental status
* Pregnant and/or lactating women (Female patients below age 60, without history of hysterectomy or are not documented to be post-menopausal, will be given a urine pregnancy test to confirm they are not pregnant)
* Patients who have an MRI investigation planned within 2 weeks
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EnteraSense Limited
INDUSTRY
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wee Khoon Ng
Senior Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr Ng Wee Khoon
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gleeson F, Clarke E, Lennon J, MacMathuna R, Crowe J. Outcome of accident and emergency room triaged patients with low risk non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Ir Med J. 2006 Apr;99(4):114-7.
Owensby S, Taylor K, Wilkins T. Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):134-45. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140153.
Biecker E, Heller J, Schmitz V, Lammert F, Sauerbruch T. Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Feb;105(5):85-94. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0085. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
Ferguson CB, Mitchell RM. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ulster Med J. 2006 Jan;75(1):32-9. No abstract available.
Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):222-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.222.
Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.3.316.
Zimmerman J, Meroz Y, Arnon R, Tsvang E, Siguencia J. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with secondary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. J Intern Med. 1995 Mar;237(3):331-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb01183.x.
Schembre DB, Ely RE, Connolly JM, Padhya KT, Sharda R, Brandabur JJ. Semiautomated Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score helps direct bed placement for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;7(1):e000479. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000479.
Fisher L, Fisher A, Pavli P, Davis M. Perioperative acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in older patients with hip fracture: incidence, risk factors and prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb 1;25(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03187.x. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
Sengupta N. Integrating Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Scores into Clinical Practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov;114(11):1699-1703. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000417. No abstract available.
Sachdev MS, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE, Heigh RI, Hara AK, Post JA, Erickson PJ, Sharma VK. A prospective study of the utility of abdominal radiographs after capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of capsule retention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov;66(5):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.066.
Rezapour M, Amadi C, Gerson LB. Retention associated with video capsule endoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1157-1168.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Gonzalez B, Pons V, Caunedo A, Valle J, Redondo-Cerezo E, Lopez-Higueras A, Valdes M, Menchen P, Fernandez P, Munoz-Navas M, Jimenez J, Herrerias JM. Incidence, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic approaches of capsule endoscopy-related adverse events in a large study population. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Dec;107(12):745-52. doi: 10.17235/reed.2015.3820/2015.
Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031.
Lim YJ, Lee OY, Jeen YT, Lim CY, Cheung DY, Cheon JH, Ye BD, Song HJ, Kim JS, Do JH, Lee KJ, Shim KN, Chang DK, Park CH, Jang BI, Moon JS, Chun HJ, Choi MG, Kim JO; Korean Gut Image Study Group. Indications for Detection, Completion, and Retention Rates of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Based on the 10-Year Data from the Korean Capsule Endoscopy Registry. Clin Endosc. 2015 Sep;48(5):399-404. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.399. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Rondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C, Ballardini G, Bianchi G, Brunati S, Centenara L, Cesari P, Cortelezzi C, Curioni S, Gozzini C, Gullotta R, Lazzaroni M, Maino M, Mandelli G, Mantovani N, Morandi E, Pansoni C, Piubello W, Putignano R, Schalling R, Tatarella M, Villa F, Vitagliano P, Russo A, Conte D, Masci E, de Franchis R; AIGO, SIED and SIGE Lombardia. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;22(11):1380-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283352ced.
Nemeth A, Wurm Johansson G, Nielsen J, Thorlacius H, Toth E. Capsule retention related to small bowel capsule endoscopy: a large European single-center 10-year clinical experience. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Aug;5(5):677-686. doi: 10.1177/2050640616675219. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
Thorndal C, Selnes O, Lei II, Koulaouzidis A. A systematic review of capsule aspiration in capsule endoscopy. Ann Transl Med. 2024 Feb 1;12(1):12. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-763. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
Mehta CR, Pocock SJ. Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples. Stat Med. 2011 Dec 10;30(28):3267-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.4102. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024/00060
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id