The Optimal Timing of the Initiation of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy After Oral Lidocaine Spray

NCT ID: NCT06497296

Last Updated: 2024-07-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the main examination in the upper gastrointestinal field. Aspiration pneumonia may happen if choking occurs during the EGD insertion, and the exam quality and efficacy may be affected if gag reflex occurs. The endoscopist may terminate the exam to avoid complications if the patient could not obey the orders. To reach the high quality of EGD examination and to avoid possible complications, the patient's comfort and compliance during the EGD examination are important. Sedation using propofol can improve the patient's comfort and compliance. However, in patients unsuitable for systemic anesthesia, local lidocaine spray at pharynx is performed instead. Until now, there is no standardization of the waiting time between lidocaine spray and the initiation of EGD. This study aimed to investigate the optimal timing of the initiation of esophagogastroduodenoscopy after lidocaine spray.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study compares the 1-minute waiting time and 3-minute waiting time between the lidocaine spray and the EGD initiation. During the topical anesthesia stage, investigators give local spray with 6 puff on pharynx at the 0 minute in both groups. After the waiting time, EGD is inserted.

The baseline heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before EGD and during the EGD passing through pharynx respectively. After the whole procedure, enrolled patients will fill in the EGD quality questionnaire.

Through this study, investigators can figure out whether 1 minute or 3 minutes may be the optimal waiting time after lidocaine spray.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Pressure Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Both group accepted 6 puff of lidocaine spray. EGD will be inserted one minute after the lidocaine spray in 1-minute group and 3 minutes waiting in 3-minute group
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Sealed and ordered envelope will be opened by assistant and the allocation was written on it. After then, lidocaine spray will be administered. The operator will be informed to prepare 30 seconds before the EGD initiation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1-minute group

6 puff of lidocaine was delivered 1 minute before the initiation of EGD insertion

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine spray in both group with same puff number, but the timing before EGD insertion is different

3-minute group

6 puff of lidocaine was delivered 3 minutes before the initiation of EGD insertion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine spray in both group with same puff number, but the timing before EGD insertion is different

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine

Lidocaine spray in both group with same puff number, but the timing before EGD insertion is different

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible participants included patients aged ≥ 20 years who scheduled EGD from OPD for dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, GERD, subepithelial lesion evaluation, and diarrhea

Exclusion Criteria

* GI bleeding
* endoscopic submucosal dissection due to prolonged scheduled procedure time
* patients from emergency department or ward
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hsueh-Chien Chiang

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hsueh-Chien Chiang

Tainan City, Other (Non U.s.), Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hsueh-Chien Chiang, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

062353535

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hsueh-Chien Chiang

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Dominitz JA, Lieb JG 2nd, Lieberman DA, Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Wani S. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.055. Epub 2014 Dec 2. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25480102 (View on PubMed)

ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans J, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fisher L, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Ikenberry SO, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Krinsky ML, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RN, Dominitz JA, Cash BD. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):707-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.252. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22985638 (View on PubMed)

Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro G. Preparation, premedication, and surveillance. Endoscopy. 2005 Feb;37(2):101-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826149.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15692924 (View on PubMed)

Leitch DG, Wicks J, el Beshir OA, Ali SA, Chaudhury BK. Topical anesthesia with 50 mg of lidocaine spray facilitates upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;39(3):384-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70110-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8514070 (View on PubMed)

Evans LT, Saberi S, Kim HM, Elta GH, Schoenfeld P. Pharyngeal anesthesia during sedated EGDs: is "the spray" beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 May;63(6):761-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.059.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16650534 (View on PubMed)

Hwang SH, Park CS, Kim BG, Cho JH, Kang JM. Topical anesthetic preparations for rigid and flexible endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Feb;272(2):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3012-8. Epub 2014 Mar 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24682602 (View on PubMed)

Martin-Marcos I, Fernandez-Morte N, Balsategui-Martin M, Ortiz-Cantero A, Bermudez-Ampudia C, Lopez-Picado A, Perez-Vaquero P, Salvador-Perez M, Cristobal-Dominguez E. Evaluation of pharyngeal lidocaine anesthesia for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Double-blind randomized control trial. Dig Endosc. 2022 May;34(4):808-815. doi: 10.1111/den.14168. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34644419 (View on PubMed)

Chiang HC, Chiang CM, Chang WL, Lin MY. Clinical Trial: The Optimal Timing of the Endoscope Insertion After Oral Lidocaine Spray. A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;40(6):1428-1434. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16958. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40166898 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B-ER-111-218

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.