Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-01
2024-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. To investigate integrated neuromuscular inhibition versus Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on pain intensity at initial morning step in patient with chronic plantar fasciitis.
3. To investigate integrated neuromuscular inhibition versus Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on pain pressure threshold in patient with chronic plantar fasciitis.
4. To investigate integrated neuromuscular inhibition versus Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on active dorsiflexion ROM in patient with chronic plantar fasciitis.
5. To investigate integrated neuromuscular inhibition versus Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on functional disability in patient chronic plantar fasciitis.
5\) Investigate integrated neuromuscular inhibition versus Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on functional disability in patient chronic plantar fasciitis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization With Positional Release Technique for Plantar Fasciitis Pain and Range of Motion
NCT07070245
Ankle Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Versus Foot Core Exercise in Patients With Plantar Fascitis
NCT07037290
Effect of Kaltenborn vs Mulligan Mobilization With Intrinsic Foot Strengthening in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT07078539
Plantar Fasciitis Management on Postural Control
NCT06172517
The Acute Effect of Isotonic Versus Isometric Exercise Versus Walking on Pain in Individuals With Plantar Fasciopathy
NCT03264729
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Myofascial trigger points have the potential to create pain, limit ROM and restrict functional activities and should therefore be addressed as part of a comprehensive physical therapy program. Currently, a large variety of both manual and non-manual interventions exist for the deactivation of trigger points (TrPs). Manual approaches may include muscle energy techniques (METs), strain-counterstrain (SCS), myofascial release, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, and ischemic compression.Integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) is a method that includes three maneuvers in one. The three techniques are ischemic compression (IC) or trigger point release, strain counterstrain technique, and muscle energy technique (MET). In trigger point release, compression is given at the trigger point region and maintained for 15 seconds, while in strain counterstrain technique, the superficial fascia is stretched. MET works on the principle of reciprocal inhibition.Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) is uses specifically designed instruments to identify and treat myofascial restrictions. It is based off the principles of deep transverse friction massage. It is also known as Graston Technique. There are 6 stainless steel instruments which are specific for different regions and types of muscles which need to be targeted. It is designed to reduce fatigue of the clinician\'s hands and to detect lesions by amplifying the resonance felt through the instrument.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique
integrated neuromuscular inhibition in addition to conventional treatment
integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique
integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique for gastrocniemus muscle
instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization
instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization technique (IASTM) in addition to conventional treatment
instrument assissted soft tissue mobilization
instrument assissted soft tissue mobilization for calf muscle
conventional treatment
(home education program, therapeutic ultrasound, plantar fascia stretching, intrinsic muscle strengthening of foot, Self stretching of calf muscle using a towel and Ice Massage using frozen bottle).
convential treatment
convential treatment (home education program, therapeutic ultrasound, plantar fascia stretching, intrinsic muscle strengthening of foot, Self stretching of calf muscle using a towel and Ice Massage using frozen bottle).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique
integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique for gastrocniemus muscle
instrument assissted soft tissue mobilization
instrument assissted soft tissue mobilization for calf muscle
convential treatment
convential treatment (home education program, therapeutic ultrasound, plantar fascia stretching, intrinsic muscle strengthening of foot, Self stretching of calf muscle using a towel and Ice Massage using frozen bottle).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Plantar heel pain with first few steps upon walking in the morning and after prolonged rest.
* Patient\'s Age between 40-60 years old.
* Patient\'s Body mass index (BMI 18 to 29.9kg/m2).
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of any red flags i.e., tumor, fracture, and heterotrophic ossification and had acute inflammatory condition at ankle-foot region were excluded from the study.
* Deformity of foot and ankle complex and subjects with referred pain due to sciatica and other neurological disorder.
40 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
esraa khairy afify esmail
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
magda zahran, Ass.Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
faculty of physical therapy
Fatma Amin, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
faculty of physical therapy
mohammed kaddah, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INIT versus IASTM in PF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.