Intra-Tumoral Vascular Growth Patterns is a Robust Indicator of Adjuvant Therapy Following Liver Resection in HCC

NCT ID: NCT06461936

Last Updated: 2024-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

620 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC) is an invasive metastatic factor in HCC independent of the epithelial mesenchyme transition (EMT), and VETC positive patients have a higher rate of postoperative recurrence. However, it is not clear how the surgical prognosis of VETC-positive patients can be improved.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide, with the number of new cases and deaths increasing yearly. Curative surgery continues to be the preferred treatment for early-stage HCC. However, some early-stage HCC often experience early recurrence after surgery, and one of the most common risk factors is microvascular invasion (MVI). Nevertheless, the overall prognosis of some MVI-negative patients is also not satisfactory. Whether there are other hidden robust risk factors for recurrence is of intense interest to clinical scientists.

In contrast to the classic capillary pattern, cobweb-like pattern of vascular is present in renal cell carcinoma, thyroid follicular carcinoma and HCC. Specifically, this particular vascular pattern is a continuous lining of sinusoid-like vessels that isolate and encapsulate individual tumor clusters, and Fang et al. named it vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC). CD34 or CD31 immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue can easily identify the vascular pattern of VETC, which can exist at any stage of HCC, accounting for about 40%-50.6%. VETC could directly invade adjacent vascular and migrate as tumor clusters instead of epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway, which may well explain why VETC-positive HCC is closely associated with higher postoperative recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Due to the high proportion of VETC vascular patterns and poor prognosis, it is necessary to adopt effective adjuvant treatment. Zhuan et al found that unresectable VETC+HCC could benefit from treatment with sorafenib in a subsequent study. Similarly, another study found that FGF 2 and FGFR 3-4 (rather than VEGF-A or VEGFR 1-3) were high expression in VETC+ HCC, which raise the possibility that lenvatinib is a potentially effective treatment modality. Recently, a multicenter randomized controlled trial of postoperative adjuvant Sintilimab reported encouraging positive results, suggesting the possibility of its application in VETC-positive patients. Whether the combination of lenvatinib and Sintilimab can further improve the prognosis is also worth exploring.

To address these clinical challenges, the investigators conducted a multicenter study involving three surgical cohorts with postoperative active surveillance cohort(AC), adjuvant Sintilimab cohort(AS), and adjuvant Sintilimab plus Lenvatinib cohort(ASL). The cases in the AS cohort were mainly from a previous prospective cohort study initiated by the investigator's center and a later cohort expansion (NCT05307926). Moreover, multi-omics sequencing analysis aims to further explore the molecular biological characteristics between VETC positive and negative HCC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HCC Adjuvant Therapy Immunotherapy Recurrence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Surveillance Group(AC)

Patients in AC group received no adjuvant therapy after liver resection.

No interventions assigned to this group

Adjuvant sintilimab group(AS)

Patients in AS group received adjuvant sintilimab after liver resection.

Sintilimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient receives first adjuvant PD-1monoclonal antibody 2-4 weeks postoperatively, 200mg IV over 21 days for 9 cycles.

Adjuvant sintilimab plus Lenvatinib group (ASL)

Patients in ASL group received adjuvant sintilimab plus lenvatinib therapy after liver resection.

Sintilimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient receives first adjuvant PD-1monoclonal antibody 2-4 weeks postoperatively, 200mg IV over 21 days for 9 cycles.

Lenvatinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenvatinib is initiated orally 2-4 weeks postoperatively for about 6 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sintilimab

Patient receives first adjuvant PD-1monoclonal antibody 2-4 weeks postoperatively, 200mg IV over 21 days for 9 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenvatinib

Lenvatinib is initiated orally 2-4 weeks postoperatively for about 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Underwent radical hepatectomy
* No preoperative treatment
* Pathological confirmed HCC
* High-risk recurrent HCC
* Not receiving any adjuvant therapy or receiving adjuvant therapy with PD-1 monotherapy or receiving adjuvant therapy with PD-1 monotherapy in combination with Lenvatinib after surgery
* Evaluable wax block tissue as well as complete clinical information

Exclusion Criteria

* Distant metastasis
* No available wax blocks
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chen Xiaoping

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chen Xiaoping

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PrecisionAT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.