Use of Machine Learning Techniques for Serial Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT06447532
Last Updated: 2025-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
4500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-08-01
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence in Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Screening
NCT04156880
Artificial Intelligence Model-Assisted Accurate Diagnosis of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
NCT07063667
Deep Learning With MRI-based Multimodal-data Fusion Enhanced Postoperative Risk Stratification of Breast Cancer
NCT06546072
Real-World Data on First-line Treatment of Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative, Metastatic Breast Cancer in Brazil
NCT05034393
AI-Based Self-Supervised Learning Model Using Non-Contrast Breast MRI for Early Screening and Clinical Utility Evaluation
NCT07205276
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although regular laboratory tests have potential to be breast cancer biomarkers, a single test is yet to provide adequate sensitivity or specificity. Artificial intelligence (AI) could help with integrating data from multiple tests to aid diagnosis. Technical improvements such as data storage capacity, computing power, and better algorithms mean that ML can process clinically meaningful information from laboratory test data. Models' generalisability and stability still need to be confirmed, in view of limitations such as the absence of various pathological types, small cohorts, and lack of external validation. Therefore, a competitive model is also essential to achieve more accurate stratification of patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective multicentre study is to systematically evaluate the ability of laboratory tests to predict breast cancer, and develop a robust and generalisable model to assist in identifying patients with breast cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I: Breast cancer
All the participants involved in our study are women who are diagnosed breast cancer and treated with surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 1st 2013 to December 31st 2018.
Surgery (Mastectomy or quadrantectomy)
Surgery (mastectomy or quadrantectomy); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgery (Mastectomy or quadrantectomy)
Surgery (mastectomy or quadrantectomy); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Invasive breast carcinoma patients diagnosed by pathology ;
* Patients diagnosed between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018;
* Have a complete blood count performed before the surgical intervention (mastectomy or conservative breast surgery) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
Exclusion Criteria
* Bilateral breast cancer;
* Male;
* Karnofsky Performance Status Score \< 70';
* Inflammatory breast cancer and in situ carcinoma;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Evidence of local or distant recurrence.
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kansai Medical University
OTHER
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Kyoto University
OTHER
Barretos Cancer Hospital
OTHER
Women's College Hospital
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
University of Campinas, Brazil
OTHER
Centro de Educación Medica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno
OTHER
Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil
OTHER_GOV
Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro
OTHER
Instituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular Hospital Zambrano-Hellion Tec Salud
OTHER
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
OTHER
Mansoura University
OTHER
Seoul National University
OTHER
Federal University of São Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Afonso Celso Pinto Nazario
Professor and Coordinator at the Department of Gynecology at EPM/UNIFESP.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Afonso C Nazario, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Federal of Sao Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pablo Mandó
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Rosekeila Simoes Nomeline
Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Tomás Reinert
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Idam Oliveira Junior
Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
César Cabello
Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Daniel Guimaraes Tiezzi
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Vasily Giannakeas
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Salma Elashwah
Cairo, , Egypt
Masahiro Takada
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
Masakazu Toi
Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Cynthia Mayte Villarreal Garza
Mexico City, , Mexico
Wonshik Han
Seoul, , South Korea
Cristina Saura
Madrid, Spain, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Faria SS, Giannarelli D, Cordeiro de Lima VC, Anwar SL, Casadei C, De Giorgi U, Madonna G, Ascierto PA, Mendoza Lopez RV, Chammas R, Capone M. Development of a Prognostic Model for Early Breast Cancer Integrating Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Clinical-Pathological Characteristics. Oncologist. 2024 Apr 4;29(4):e447-e454. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad303.
Choi E, Bahadori MT, Schuetz A, Stewart WF, Sun J. Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networks. JMLR Workshop Conf Proc. 2016 Aug;56:301-318. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
University of Sao Paulo
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.