Use of Machine Learning Techniques for Serial Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT06447532

Last Updated: 2025-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

4500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2027-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women globally, with 2.3 million new cases diagnosed in 2020. Hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype, comprising 69% of all breast cancers in the USA. Within the tumor immune microenvironment, a higher intensity of myeloid cell infiltration and low levels of lymphocyte infiltration have been associated with worse outcomes. Markers in peripheral blood have emerged as predictive biomarkers that can be easily obtained non-invasively and at low cost. Experiments have confirmed the relative components of these tests (such as the immune cells) directly or indirectly participated in tumour occurrence, development, and immune escape, underscoring the potential use of laboratory tests as tumour biomarkers

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In breast cancer, increased neutrophil levels and decreased lymphocyte levels in peripheral blood are associated with worse overall survival (OS). In HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancers, low pretreatment NLR and high pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) were related with better progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. The development of predictive models, based on machine learning (ML) algorithms it has been used in prognostication and assist in the diagnosis of different types of cancer.

Although regular laboratory tests have potential to be breast cancer biomarkers, a single test is yet to provide adequate sensitivity or specificity. Artificial intelligence (AI) could help with integrating data from multiple tests to aid diagnosis. Technical improvements such as data storage capacity, computing power, and better algorithms mean that ML can process clinically meaningful information from laboratory test data. Models' generalisability and stability still need to be confirmed, in view of limitations such as the absence of various pathological types, small cohorts, and lack of external validation. Therefore, a competitive model is also essential to achieve more accurate stratification of patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective multicentre study is to systematically evaluate the ability of laboratory tests to predict breast cancer, and develop a robust and generalisable model to assist in identifying patients with breast cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I: Breast cancer

All the participants involved in our study are women who are diagnosed breast cancer and treated with surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 1st 2013 to December 31st 2018.

Surgery (Mastectomy or quadrantectomy)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery (mastectomy or quadrantectomy); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery (Mastectomy or quadrantectomy)

Surgery (mastectomy or quadrantectomy); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women patients with age between 18 and 75 years old;
* Invasive breast carcinoma patients diagnosed by pathology ;
* Patients diagnosed between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018;
* Have a complete blood count performed before the surgical intervention (mastectomy or conservative breast surgery) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy;

Exclusion Criteria

Presence of hematological disorders;

* Bilateral breast cancer;
* Male;
* Karnofsky Performance Status Score \< 70';
* Inflammatory breast cancer and in situ carcinoma;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Evidence of local or distant recurrence.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kansai Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kyoto University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barretos Cancer Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Women's College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Campinas, Brazil

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centro de Educación Medica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular Hospital Zambrano-Hellion Tec Salud

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federal University of São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Afonso Celso Pinto Nazario

Professor and Coordinator at the Department of Gynecology at EPM/UNIFESP.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Afonso C Nazario, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Federal of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pablo Mandó

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Rosekeila Simoes Nomeline

Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Tomás Reinert

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Idam Oliveira Junior

Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

César Cabello

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Daniel Guimaraes Tiezzi

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Vasily Giannakeas

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Salma Elashwah

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Masahiro Takada

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Masakazu Toi

Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Cynthia Mayte Villarreal Garza

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Wonshik Han

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Cristina Saura

Madrid, Spain, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Brazil Canada Egypt Japan Mexico South Korea Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33538338 (View on PubMed)

Faria SS, Giannarelli D, Cordeiro de Lima VC, Anwar SL, Casadei C, De Giorgi U, Madonna G, Ascierto PA, Mendoza Lopez RV, Chammas R, Capone M. Development of a Prognostic Model for Early Breast Cancer Integrating Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Clinical-Pathological Characteristics. Oncologist. 2024 Apr 4;29(4):e447-e454. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad303.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37971409 (View on PubMed)

Choi E, Bahadori MT, Schuetz A, Stewart WF, Sun J. Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networks. JMLR Workshop Conf Proc. 2016 Aug;56:301-318. Epub 2016 Dec 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28286600 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

University of Sao Paulo

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HER2-PET Imaging in HER2-low Breast Cancers
NCT06732336 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2