Imaging Predictors of Cryolysis Efficacy for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

NCT ID: NCT06434558

Last Updated: 2025-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-12

Study Completion Date

2030-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to further evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of the Cryosa Procedure, a novel procedure intended to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The patient population includes participants with OSA who are enrolled in the ARCTIC-3 study and are undergoing the Cryosa Procedure. The main questions to be answered are:

(1) evaluate predictors of successful treatment with the Cryosa Procedure, which is described in more detail in the ARCTIC-3 protocol (IRB #854182), and (2) evaluate a potential mechanism of action of this novel therapy.

The study team hypothesizes that higher baseline quantities of oropharyngeal fat and higher baseline upper airway neurotonic activity will be correlated with a successful reduction in OSA symptom severity as measured by a change in apnea-hypopnea index values. The study team also hypothesizes that responders will have a decrease in oropharyngeal fat, which would indicate the mechanism of action of this novel therapy is a loss in oropharyngeal fat.

Participants will be asked to:

1. have an MRI before undergoing the Cryosa Procedure
2. have an ultrasound before the Cryosa Procedure
3. permit the use of pressure-sensing catheters and ultrasound during their drug-induced sleep endoscopy, which is part of the ARCTIC-3 protocol
4. have an MRI after the Cryosa Procedure
5. have an ultrasound after the Cryosa Procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Previous research has shown there is increased fat at the base of the tongue and other locations of the oropharynx in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) compared to match control non-OSA patients. Subsequently, Cryosa developed the Cryosa Procedure, which is further detailed in the ARCTIC-3 protocol (IRB #854182). This procedure involves the Cryosa System, a device intended to induce adipose cryolysis, a non-surgical removal of by inducing cell death (apoptosis) with a controlled freezing of the soft tissue, in the upper airway.

Whereas the objective of the ARCTIC-3 study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the Cryosa Procedure, the co-primary aims of the ICE-OSA study are to (1) evaluate predictors of successful treatment with the Cryosa Procedure and (2) evaluate a potential mechanism of action of this novel therapy. The study team hypothesizes that (1) higher baseline quantity of oropharyngeal fat and higher baseline upper airway neurotonic activity are correlated with a successful reduction in OSA severity, and (2) responders will have a decrease in quantity of oropharyngeal fat (as measured by post-operation magnetic resonance imaging, MRI). Investigating the mechanisms and predictors of this novel therapy is necessary to inform future clinical trials and patient selection for the Cryosa Procedure. To assess these metrics, the ICE-OSA study utilizes MRI, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and the addition of pharyngeal manometry and ultrasound (US) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for ARCTIC-3 participants.

Study Statistics:

These prognostic data are going to be collected as part of a small pilot study to inform the upcoming pivotal trial. For this reason, investigators seek independent variables with large effect sizes to update and enhance patient selection criteria for the future trial.

The study team propose use of Student's t-test for responders/non-responders (responder defined as reduction of AHI by \>50%) for the surgical intervention. The expected ratio of responders to non-responders is 1:1 based on data provided by the study sponsor (unpublished).

Previous data examining tongue fat in MRI demonstrated values of quantity of fat tissue in fatty tongues to be roughly 14,000 mm3 and fat tissue in non-fatty tongues to be roughly 7,000 mm3. Using these parameters, it was calculated that 10 subjects total would be required (assuming a standard deviation of 4,000 mm3) to detect significant differences between responders/non-responders with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cryosa Procedure

The Cryosa Procedure is part of the ARCTIC-3 protocol (IRB #854182). Therefore, all patients enrolled in this study are expected to undergo the Cryosa Procedure. Undergoing the Cryosa Procedure is not a part of this protocol.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cryotherapy OSA Cryotreatment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Enrolled in the ARCTIC-3 clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania\*
* Provision of signed and dated informed consent form for ICE-OSA

Exclusion Criteria

* MRI contraindications (claustrophobia, ferromagnetic implants/foreign bodies, etc.)
* Patient is pregnant or becomes pregnant during their enrollment
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Raj Dedhia, MD

Associate Professor of Otorhinolaryngology & Medicine | Director, Division of Sleep Surgery & CPAP Alternatives Clinic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Raj Dedhia, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

855200

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.