Consecutive Dual-Session tDCS in Chronic Subjective Severe to Catastrophic Tinnitus With Normal Hearing

NCT ID: NCT06423742

Last Updated: 2024-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-15

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We aimed to analyze the effect of continuous dual session tDCS in patients with severe chronic subjective tinnitus without any evidence of hearing loss in terms of relief of tinnitus perception, distress, and loudness. Also, we investigated the difference in the maintenance duration of the tinnitus suppression effect of consecutive dual session tDCS compared to other groups followed up for 2 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The participants were randomly allocated with three different arms (control, single-session, and dual session) using block to balance the size of each group. Pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, tinnitogram (pitch matching, loudness, minimal masking level and residual inhibition), auditory evoked potential, THI, visual analogue scale (VAS) of loudness, awareness and annoyance, and BDI were evaluated as a baseline tests. Participants who assigned to the control group underwent dual sham stimulation per day, twice a week for 1 month. Patients were received sham and true stimulation once alternately in the single session group and two true stimulation per day in the dual session group for the same period as the control group. All subjects who enrolled this study were given a conventional treatment such as tinnitus retraining therapy, sound therapy using sound generator, and medications like clonazepam, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for patients who wanted to take for relief of symptoms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tinnitus, Subjective

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The participants were randomly allocated with three different arms (control, single-session, and dual session) using block to balance the size of each group. . Participants who assigned to the control group underwent dual sham stimulation per day, twice a week for 1 month. Patients were received sham and true stimulation once alternately in the single session group and two true stimulation per day in the dual session group for the same period as the control group. All subjects who enrolled this study were given a conventional treatment such as tinnitus retraining therapy, sound therapy using sound generator, and medications like clonazepam, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for patients who wanted to take for relief of symptoms.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control

The subjects in control group were received two consecutive sessions of sham stimulation twice a week for 4 weeks (8 sessions in total).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.

single-session

Patients enrolled to the single-session group received tDCS on one random session out of two consecutive sessions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.

dual-session

In the dual-session group, the patients underwent two consecutives tDCS.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial direct current stimulation

The device used for tDCS in this study was DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany). The localization of stimulation area (DLPFC) was determined according to the 10/20 EEG system. Non-conducting, elastic head strap was placed around the head to prevent displacement during stimulation. The recording electrode covered with 5 x 7 cm sized traditional rectangular sponge was soaked with 6-7 mL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution per side and placed on the F3 (anode, left frontal) and F4 (cathode, right frontal) EEG location. Subjects were given 2 mA stimulation intensity for 20 min per session including fade-in and fade-out times for 20 seconds each. Interval between each session was 20 min. Sham procedure has been adopted a Fade In of current, Short Stimulation, Fade Out (FISSFO) protocol that consist of initial ramp up for 20 seconds, 2 mA stimulation for 40 seconds, and 20 seconds for ramp down. To check to impendence, brief current of 110 µA over 15ms every 550ms was delivered.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals who have experienced subjective tinnitus for over 3 months.
* Individuals with normal hearing, defined as an average pure tone threshold of less than 25 dB between 0.5-4 kHz, and the presence of the V wave at 30 dBnHL with a difference in V wave latency of less than 0.2 ms in both ears during the ABR test.
* Individuals with severe tinnitus, as indicated by a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score of 58 or higher, and who have been assessed for symptoms of anxiety and depressive mood using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria

* Those requiring treatment for neurological disorders such as epilepsy, migraine, or intracranial masses.
* Pregnant individuals on the day of providing consent and those with metal-based electric implantable prosthetics.
* Individuals with objective or somatic tinnitus, auditory hallucinations, unwillingness to provide written consent, or unwillingness to continue the trial, and those who have participated in previous trials involving tDCS for tinnitus.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sung Kyun Kim

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital

Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-11-009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.