Strict Versus Permissive Thresholds for Initiation of Pharmacotherapy in Gestational Diabetes (START 2)
NCT ID: NCT06419803
Last Updated: 2024-11-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
430 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Strict Versus Permissive Thresholds for Initiation of Pharmacotherapy in Gestational Diabetes
NCT06419777
Gestational Diabetes and Pharmacotherapy (GAP)
NCT03527537
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Substudy of the DECIDE RCT
NCT06490874
Intrapartum Glycemic Control in GDMA2
NCT05647798
Patient Versus Provider-led Titration of Insulin for Glycemic Control in Gestational Diabetes (EMPOWER)
NCT05922033
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Various studies have examined the benefit of treatment for GDM, including the 2005 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) and the 2009 Landon et al randomized controlled trials. These studies found that treatment was associated with a significant reduction in newborn complications of perinatal death, shoulder dystocia, large for gestational age infants, cesarean delivery, and birth trauma. The specific threshold value for initiation and up-titration of medical therapy is unknown. Lack of evidence leads to a wide variation in clinical practice of pharmacological initiation and titration for GDM. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Caissutti in 2019 analyzed criteria for initiating pharmacotherapy for GDM and noted the following: 12 of 15 trials initiated pharmacotherapy after 1-2 abnormal values over 1-2 weeks, 2 studies initiated pharmacotherapy after 50% of overall values were abnormal, and 1 study initiated pharmacotherapy after 30% of overall values were abnormal. However, there have been no randomized controlled trials of head-to-head comparison of different thresholds.
The aim of our study is to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes using different thresholds for the initiation and titration of pharmacotherapy for GDM using continuous glucose monitor. Our goal is to compare a Strict and permissive threshold. The Strict study arm target range will be 65-120 mg/dL, with time in range goal of 70%. The permissive study arm target range will be 65-140 mg/dL, with target time in range goal of 70%.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Strict Arm
The Strict study arm target range will be 65-120 mg/dL, with time in range goal of 70%.
Insulin
Insulin will be used in gestational diabetics to control blood glucose levels
Permissive
The permissive study arm target range will be 65-140 mg/dL, with target time in range goal of 70%.
Insulin
Insulin will be used in gestational diabetics to control blood glucose levels
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Insulin
Insulin will be used in gestational diabetics to control blood glucose levels
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Literacy in English, Spanish, Mandarin, or Arabic
* Patients are also required to provide consent, demonstrate an understanding of the purpose of the study, and agree to the study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
* pre-existing diabetes or diagnosis of GDM prior to 24 weeks
* multi-fetal gestation
* known major fetal anomaly
* known allergy to insulin
* chronic maternal corticosteroid use
* diagnosis of GDM based on finger sticks alone
* patients who have contraindication to oral glucose tolerance test
* a primary language other than English, Spanish, Mandarin, or Arabic
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Rochester
OTHER
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Sarah Crimmins, Do
Role: primary
Kavisha Khanuja, MD
Role: primary
Rodney McLaren, MD
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kunarathnam V, Vadakekut ES, Mahdy H. Gestational Diabetes. 2025 Sep 15. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545196/
Catalano PM, Hauguel-De Mouzon S. Is it time to revisit the Pedersen hypothesis in the face of the obesity epidemic? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;204(6):479-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.039. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
Gregory EC, Ely DM. Trends and Characteristics in Gestational Diabetes: United States, 2016-2020. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2022 Jul;71(3):1-15.
Metzger BE, Persson B, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Cruickshank JK, Deerochanawong C, Halliday HL, Hennis AJ, Liley H, Ng PC, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, Hod M, Oats JJ, Trimble ER; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: neonatal glycemia. Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):e1545-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2257. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):e49-e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501.
Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS; Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2477-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042973. Epub 2005 Jun 12.
Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Rouse DJ, Thorp JM Jr, Sciscione A, Catalano P, Harper M, Saade G, Lain KY, Sorokin Y, Peaceman AM, Tolosa JE, Anderson GB; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1339-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902430.
Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Donovan L. Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):123-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661.
Davitt C, Flynn KE, Harrison RK, Pan A, Palatnik A. Current practices in gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis and management in the United States: survey of maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):203-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.263. Epub 2021 May 14. No abstract available.
Caissutti C, Saccone G, Ciardulli A, Berghella V. Very tight vs. tight control: what should be the criteria for pharmacologic therapy dose adjustment in diabetes in pregnancy? Evidence from randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Mar;97(3):235-247. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13257. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Harrison RK, Cruz M, Wong A, Davitt C, Palatnik A. The timing of initiation of pharmacotherapy for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 11;20(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03449-y.
Landy HJ, Gomez-Marin O, O'Sullivan MJ. Diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: use of a glucose screen without administering the glucose tolerance test. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;87(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00460-2.
Harper LM, Mele L, Landon MB, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Reddy UM, Casey B, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Thorp JM Jr, Sciscione A, Catalano P, Harper M, Saade G, Caritis SN, Sorokin Y, Peaceman AM, Tolosa JE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Carpenter-Coustan Compared With National Diabetes Data Group Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;127(5):893-898. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001383.
Blum AK. Insulin Use in Pregnancy: An Update. Diabetes Spectr. 2016 May;29(2):92-7. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.29.2.92.
Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Apr 20;13:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
iRISID-2024-3181
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.