Effects of Functional Progressive Strength Training in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

NCT ID: NCT06407869

Last Updated: 2024-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-28

Study Completion Date

2024-08-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study focuses on the effects of Functional Progressive Strength Training (FPST) on children with spastic cerebral palsy, a condition characterized by increased muscle tone that affects movement. Spastic cerebral palsy is one type of cerebral palsy, with others including dyskinetic, which involves involuntary movements, and ataxic, which affects coordination. FPST differs from traditional strength training by incorporating exercises that replicate everyday activities to integrate strength use in daily movements. The study uses an experimental design with participants aged 6-12 years, recruited from specialized centers. They are randomly assigned to either a treatment group receiving FPST or a control group receiving standard care. The study aims to measure improvements in gait and mobility, assessed through various tools like step and stride length, cadence, and gait speed, alongside caregiver reports and direct observations. Statistical analyses will determine the effectiveness of FPST in enhancing motor function and walking capacity in these children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the outlined study, participants who fit the necessary inclusion and exclusion criteria are asked to provide written informed consent before taking part. The randomization process involves each participant drawing a number from a box: those who draw number one are placed in Group A (experimental group), while those drawing number two are placed in Group B (control group).

Group A undergoes a specialized treatment approach called Functional Progressive Resistance Exercise (FPRE), in addition to receiving conventional treatment. The FPRE regimen starts with a three-minute warm-up that includes range of motion mobilization and stretching exercises. This is followed by a series of resistance exercises, such as sit-to-stand activities, which increase in intensity over a six-week period, targeting specific percentages of body weight. The participants then engage in half-kneeling, standing up, and side-step-up exercises for 20 minutes each, with rest intervals. The session concludes with a two-minute cooldown. The protocol is designed to gradually increase the load carried by the participants, scaling up to five times, then 10 times, and eventually 15 times the initial weight, with a minimum of one minute of rest between sets. The exercises are calibrated through trial and error to find the maximum load that can be lifted for the defined number of repetitions and sets.

Group B participants receive conventional physical therapy aimed at maintaining muscle flexibility and improving motor function. Their routine includes an hour-long session three times a week, consisting of stretching exercises focused on muscles prone to tightness, such as the Achilles tendons, hamstrings, hip flexors, and adductors. Strength training targets specific muscle groups including hip flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors. The gait training in Group B starts in a controlled environment, such as walking between parallel bars, and progresses to more complex tasks like walking unassisted in open spaces, navigating different floor surfaces, and moving through obstacle-laden paths.

Both groups are reassessed after 12 weeks to evaluate the impact of their respective interventions on gait parameters and walking capacity, using a combination of direct observation, caregiver reports, and standardized assessment tools. The study aims to ascertain the relative efficacy of these two approaches in enhancing mobility and quality of life for children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

It will be randomized control trial in which random sampling technique will be used. Two groups of 6-12 age will be formed in which participants will randomly be divided. Group A will receive Functional Progressive Resistance Exercises and group B will receive conventional stretching and strengthening exercises
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants will get separate treatment protocols and possible efforts will be put to mask both groups about treatment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Functional Progressive Strength Training

group of 20 children with spastic cerebral palsy on which FPST techniques including 3 or 4 PRT sessions per week for 12 weekswill be applied.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Functional Progressive Strength Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The Functional Progressive Resistance Exercise (FPRE) protocol is designed to improve functional strength through structured workouts. It begins with a 3-minute warmup involving stretching and range of motion exercises, followed by progressively intense sit-to-stand exercises over six weeks. Participants also perform half-kneeling, standing up, and side-step-up exercises, with 20 minutes of total activity and rest intervals. The session ends with a 2-minute cooldown. Weights are gradually increased up to 15 times the initial load, with a minimum of one-minute rest between sets. The regimen is tailored through trial and error to find the maximum load participants can effectively manage.

Control

group of 20 children with spastic cerebral palsy on which conventional physical therapy techniques will be applied

Group Type OTHER

Control

Intervention Type OTHER

conventional physical therapy techniques will be applied

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Functional Progressive Strength Training

The Functional Progressive Resistance Exercise (FPRE) protocol is designed to improve functional strength through structured workouts. It begins with a 3-minute warmup involving stretching and range of motion exercises, followed by progressively intense sit-to-stand exercises over six weeks. Participants also perform half-kneeling, standing up, and side-step-up exercises, with 20 minutes of total activity and rest intervals. The session ends with a 2-minute cooldown. Weights are gradually increased up to 15 times the initial load, with a minimum of one-minute rest between sets. The regimen is tailored through trial and error to find the maximum load participants can effectively manage.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control

conventional physical therapy techniques will be applied

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 6 to 12 years
* Children had to be able to understand and follow instructions
* Diplegic CP
* GMFSC I, II, III

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment with botulinum toxin A in lower limb.
* Rhizotomy done 6 months before the study.
* Children with unstable seizures will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kashaf Naeem, MS*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riphah International University

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hanssen B, Peeters N, De Beukelaer N, Vannerom A, Peeters L, Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Deschepper E, Van den Broeck C, Desloovere K. Progressive resistance training for children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects on muscle strength and morphology. Front Physiol. 2022 Oct 4;13:911162. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.911162. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36267577 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/RCR&AHS/23/0778

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.