Recovery From Disability After Geriatric-home Rehabilitation Versus Standard of Care: Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT06404138

Last Updated: 2025-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2025-07-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

At discharge after a hospitalization, many older people are not as able as before their hospital stay and have difficulty performing their daily activities at home. For example, washing and dressing themselves, housework or shopping are often more difficult after discharge from hospital. However, most older people do not receive any support in regaining their physical status and self-reliance. As a result, they often need permanent help from informal or professional caregivers. Their quality of life is also impacted and they have an increased risk of new hospital admissions.

Rehabilitation centers and hospital rehabilitation wards help the elderly to regain their daily functioning, but the number of places is very limited. This means that support for home rehabilitation is necessary for the vast majority of older people (almost 82,000 people per year). However, most of the time there is no support for home rehabilitation and the effect of such home rehabilitation programs has been little studied. Although studies show that home rehabilitation can improve physical functioning, the effect on impairments in daily activities and the quality of life of older people are not clear.

In a future multicenter RCT, the investigators want to study whether training and guidance by a physiotherapist contributes to the recovery of older people after discharge from hospital.

Patients will either receive standard care after hospitalization discharge, or intensive guidance from a physiotherapist. The patients guided by the physiotherapist are trained and supervised three times a week, for six weeks, to improve their muscle strength, balance, walking and mobility. The aim of the intensive home rehabilitation program is that the individual benefits from it in the longer term. Therefore, whether individuals who received the program are less limited in their daily functioning than those who did not receive the intensive rehabilitation program is checked after six months. In addition, the quality of life, physical functioning and healthcare costs for these two groups are also compared.

To ensure that the study is feasible, a small pilot study will first be performed. Here, the aim is to assess the feasibility of recruitment (screening and retaining participants, reasons for refusal and participant profiles), study procedures and intervention. This includes time registration by the study team and physiotherapists, assessment of study burden and experiences with the execution of the protocol. The findings of this pilot study will help deciding about progressing to a future definitive RCT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Disability Physical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients are randomized 1:1 in one of the two intervention groups
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The study nurse, who assesses the outcomes during home visits (baseline, after six weeks, after one year) will be blinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Receives 18 physiotherapy sessions at home over 6 weeks according to the Geriatric Activation program Pellenberg (GAPP, see intervention)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The Geriatric Activation Program (GAPP) Home version

Intervention Type OTHER

The rehabilitation at home intervention consists of three 45 minutes session per week (total of 18 sessions) with a different focus for each session. The therapy is goal-oriented and includes functional exercises in the home where possible (e.g. transfers such as getting out of bed, walking to the toilet etc.). There are three sessions per week: 1 for training strength, 1 for training balance and 1 for speed, coordination and endurance. Each session will start with gait rehabilitation as a warming-up.

For each session, a set of exercises with varying levels of difficulty is available. As rehabilitation needs are diverse, the therapist is expected to choose the most appropriate exercise and the difficulty level of the exercise for the individual older person. This also includes scaling the exercises to the individual progression of the older person.

Control group

Older persons in the control group receive the standard of care, without any restrictions. This implies that some of the older persons in the control group could receive physical therapy, but the standard of care implies that although geriatricians regularly prescribe physical therapy the therapy is actually not started in most cases. Therefore, physical therapy will not often be delivered in the control group, and if it is delivered it will be less structured and at lower intensity and/or frequency. Moreover, physical therapy delivered to participants in the control group will not be supported by a targeted rehabilitation plan and a specific training for the therapists.

Group Type OTHER

Standard of care

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard of care, without any restrictions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The Geriatric Activation Program (GAPP) Home version

The rehabilitation at home intervention consists of three 45 minutes session per week (total of 18 sessions) with a different focus for each session. The therapy is goal-oriented and includes functional exercises in the home where possible (e.g. transfers such as getting out of bed, walking to the toilet etc.). There are three sessions per week: 1 for training strength, 1 for training balance and 1 for speed, coordination and endurance. Each session will start with gait rehabilitation as a warming-up.

For each session, a set of exercises with varying levels of difficulty is available. As rehabilitation needs are diverse, the therapist is expected to choose the most appropriate exercise and the difficulty level of the exercise for the individual older person. This also includes scaling the exercises to the individual progression of the older person.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard of care

Standard of care, without any restrictions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 75 years of age or older;
* disability (i.e., dependent in one or more activities of daily living) at hospital discharge;
* rehabilitation potential;
* capable of giving informed consent, and also giving their consent;

Exclusion Criteria

* discharged to a nursing home or rehabilitation centre;
* receiving palliative care;
* enrolled in a specialised rehabilitation programme, e.g. cardiac rehabilitation, stroke rehabilitation, respiratory rehabilitation for COPD, and oncology rehabilitation;
* in active follow-up with a physical therapist, and for whom participation in the intervention would be too demanding or would compromise the integrity of the therapy and its anticipated outcomes.
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CHU UCL Namur

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Theo van Achterberg, MSc, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU UCL Namur

Godinne, , Belgium

Site Status

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Van Grootven B, van Dijk M, Islam F, Coucke B, Fieuws S, Van Pottelbergh G, Flamaing J, Van Den Noortgate N, Velghe A, De Cock AM, Gillain S, Meeuwissen J, Bautmans I, Beckwee D, de Saint-Hubert M, van Uffelen J, Schoevaerdts D, Tournoy J, van Achterberg T. Recovery from disability after geriatric-home rehabilitation versus standard of care: protocol for a pilot study in older persons with disability at hospital discharge. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jun 21;11(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01668-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40544287 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S65872

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

KCE22-1383

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of a Mobility Program
NCT02674503 COMPLETED NA