Spine Surgery for Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

NCT ID: NCT06396286

Last Updated: 2025-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-12

Study Completion Date

2026-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Idiopathic scoliosis of developmental age (AIS) is the most vertebral deformity in the adolescent population, with a prevalence of 1-3%. The treatment of AIS depends on the morphology and extent of the curve and the growth potential residual, can range from simple clinical-radiological monitoring, to the use of braces to, in the most severe cases, correction surgical correction. The indication for surgical correction of AIS depends on the location, extent and flexibility of the scoliotic curve and not least on the patient's age or, better, the skeletal age. The primary goal of surgery is to correcting the deformity by preventing its progression, preserving as many motion segments as possible; secondarily, the surgery aims to restore the coronal and sagittal balance of the spine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Historically, the first internal fixation system used for the correction and arthrodesis of AIS is the Harrington system. The his implant provided minimal invasion of the canal vertebral canal, providing predictable correction of the deformity vertebral but with limited ability to provide control of the sagittal plane, being unable to effectively derotate the spine. Over the years, implants have been applied "second-generation" vertebrae that allow for fixation spinal by implanting pedicle screws and hooks and are more effective in correcting the curve, achieved through distraction and compression maneuvers (Cotrel-Debousset), up to to direct derotation maneuvers using of uniplanar screws that allow effective reduction of the hump costal. These techniques require the implantation of a higher density of surgical instrumentation, requiring more time surgery, greater intraoperative blood loss, greater greater risk of intraoperative neurological damage, and greater reduction spinal mobility. In addition, in recent years there has been increasing emphasis on emphasizing how lower density of the surgical instrumentation conditions the stiffness and tension of the arthrodesis system, resulting in better postoperative outcomes. Although there is awareness of the importance of reducing the invasiveness of the surgical approach, to date the most frequently adopted for the surgical correction of AIS is the vertebral fusion by instrumented arthrodesis, performed using a posterior approach (posterior spinal fusion - PSF). This technique involves a wide median incision with implantation of screws pedicle screws at the level of the vertebral soma, joined together by means of two longitudinal bars, placed lateral to the line of the spinoses. This surgical technique is invasive and is associated with substantial blood loss, severe postoperative pain, as well as the infectious risk of the surgical site. The choice of vertebral levels to be included in arthrodesis follows the classification according to Lenke, which distinguishes different types of curves. In particular, curves of type Lenke 1 would lend themselves to a less invasive approach because they are structured only at the thoracic level being therefore correctable therefore with a more selective approach. Compared with traditional the single bar has the advantage of treating the spine surgically only halfway, that is, on a single side with respect to the plane of the spinoses, i.e., the cut surgery exposes only the posterior arches of the concavity of the scoliotic curve, this results in less tissue damage, reduces the blood loss and consequently reduces infectious risk and allows early mobilization with reduced post surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scoliosis Spine Deformity Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

experimental

severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

single rod

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgical correction of severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with screws and a single rod.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

single rod

surgical correction of severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with screws and a single rod.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of AIS;
* Male and female sex;
* Age between 12 and 21;
* Thoracic scoliotic curve, type I according to Lenke's classification;
* Preoperative radiographic range of the main scoliotic curve between 40° and 70° Cobb;
* Reducibility of the curve on bending radiographs by 30%;
* Signature of the informed consent of patients/parents to actively participate in the study and clinical follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

* Scoliosis with an etiology different from AIS;
* pre-operative COBB \> 70°;
* Patients already treated surgically for scoliosis;
* Location of the scoliotic curve: Lenke 2-6;
* Patients who do not fall within the parameters described;
* Patients unable to express consent or carry out follow-ups;
* Language barrier;
* Pregnant women.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lenke LG. Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:537-42.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15948478 (View on PubMed)

Renshaw TS. The role of Harrington instrumentation and posterior spine fusion in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988 Apr;19(2):257-67.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 3282199 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BS23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id