Operating Room Nurses' Risks and Perceptions of Safety Climate

NCT ID: NCT06394505

Last Updated: 2024-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One of the leading elements in providing safe healthcare is to maintain employee health and safety. Hazards in the working environments of healthcare professionals threaten employee safety and cause errors in patient care. In this case, healthcare professionals working in a safe environment means that patients receive service in a safe environment.

Safety climate is the perception of employees of the policies, procedures and practices that exist to ensure safety in the workplace and is an important element for the formation of a safety culture in the workplace. There are many factors that determine the perception of safety climate. These factors can be listed as the type and size of the organization, the occupational risks that employees are exposed to at work, the way occupational safety is managed, the gender, seniority of employees, and their position in the organization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An organization's safety culture and team members' perceptions of the safety climate influence patient safety outcomes. Measuring the safety climate in healthcare workplaces is important to monitor the change of safety culture in the workplace over time. In units with a high safety climate, the patient safety climate is also hi.

The extent to which employees believe in and embrace safety practices, policies and procedures is a reflection of the overall safety culture. A healthy climate plays an important role in increasing both the safety of employees and the safety of patients. According to AORN, the safety of the work environment equals patient safety. There are studies showing that the risks affecting operating room staff threaten patient safety . Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the safety environment in the operating room to improve patient safety.

Evaluating the opinions and perceptions of operating room staff is important in identifying and managing risks in the operating room and creating a safety culture. Because intense dynamics, constantly changing situations and high stress levels can make it difficult to create and maintain a positive safety climate in operating rooms. Therefore, operating room managers and healthcare organizations need to pay attention to employees' risk perceptions and safety climate assessments. Although WHO emphasizes the importance of ensuring safety and safety culture in operating rooms, problems continue to occur in this regard.

The purpose of this study is to determine the risks that operating room nurses encounter during their professional activities and to evaluate how these risks affect nurses' perceptions of safety climate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Safety Issues Nursing Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Data Collection Tools

Safety Climate Scale: Since a customized safety climate perception measurement tool for nurses could not be found in the literature, the "Safety Climate Scale" (SAS), developed by Choudry et al. in 2009 and adapted to Turkish by Türen et al. in 2014, was used on healthcare workers and electronics industry workers. The scale consists of two subscales: 10 items evaluating the management's perspective and rules (YÖBAK) and 4 items evaluating colleagues and safety training (İAGE). Participants rate the statements in the scale between "strongly agree" (five points) and "strongly disagree" (one point). The total score of the scale is calculated by taking the average of the item scores, and as the average gets closer to five, the safety climate improves, and as it gets closer to one, it gets worse. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was determined as 0.93 in the study conducted by Türen et al., and in this study it was calculated as 0.82.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics Survey Form:

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Having been working as an operating room nurse for at least one year in the hospitals where the research was conducted, Having actively worked in operating room duties during the research, Voluntarily expressing participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Data from participants who took long-term leave during the study period or worked in a department other than the operating room, refused to start the study, or wanted to withdraw after starting the study were not taken into account in the final analysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

İslam Elagöz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

İslam Elagöz

Director

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kübra KAYA, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

devlet hastanesi

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Islam

Kilis, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

kilis?_8

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.