Trial Outcomes & Findings for Validation of Naevia Medical in Valvulopathies (NCT NCT06392464)
NCT ID: NCT06392464
Last Updated: 2025-12-31
Results Overview
Number of relevant appropriate recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.
COMPLETED
106 participants
1 week
2025-12-31
Participant Flow
The same group of 106 cases was evaluated before and after the CDSS activation.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Patients With Heart Valve Disease
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
106
|
|
Overall Study
Pre-test
|
106
|
|
Overall Study
Post-test
|
106
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
106
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Patients With Heart Valve Disease
n=106 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
73.35 Years
n=106 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
42 Participants
n=106 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
64 Participants
n=106 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekNumber of relevant appropriate recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients with heart valve disease (pre-test)
n=105 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
Patients with heart valve disease (post-test)
n=105 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Relevant Appropriate Recommendations
|
2.35 Recommendations
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
6.20 Recommendations
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekNumber of inappropriate recommendations (that do not apply to the specific case)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients with heart valve disease (pre-test)
n=105 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
Patients with heart valve disease (post-test)
n=105 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Inappropriate Recommendations
|
0.29 Recommendations
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
0.07 Recommendations
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekNumber of relevant missing recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients with heart valve disease (pre-test)
n=105 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
Patients with heart valve disease (post-test)
n=105 Participants
The same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
The clinical management of the included cases was retrospectively evaluated by a panel of 3 experts with access to the most updated guidelines, without activating the CDSS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Relevant Missing Recommendations
|
3.80 Recommendations
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
0.49 Recommendations
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
Adverse Events
Patients With Heart Valve Disease
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Violeta Gonzalez Salvado
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place