Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuromodulation of Upper Motor Neuron Lesion Spasticity

NCT ID: NCT06384170

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: SUSPENDED
• Total Enrollment: 12 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2024-12-03
• Study Completion Date: 2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Spasticity is characterized by increased muscle tension and is a classic consequence of upper motor neuron (UMN) damage in the central nervous system, such as from stroke or trauma. Clinically, it presents as muscle resistance to passive stretching, along with clasp-knife rigidity, clonus, increased tendon reflexes, and muscle spasms. An imbalance of the descending inhibitory and muscle stretch reflexes is thought to be the cause of spasticity. Post-stroke spasticity is a common condition that occurs in 37.5-45% of cases in the acute stage and 19-57.4% in the subacute stage after a stroke. At 6 months post-stroke, spasticity develops in 42.6-49.5% of cases, and at one year, it affects 35-57.4% of individuals. In patients with cerebral palsy (CP), incidence is almost 80% while in those living with spinal cord injury the number approaches up to 93%. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients have a higher prevalence on initial admission to neurorehabilitation but one in three patients will have chronic spasticity. However, the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center report a rate of TBIs amongst deployed veterans to be around 11-23% mostly from blast and explosive trauma.

There have been studies as early as the 1980s exploring the efficacy of SCS for spasticity control, however, the credibility of many of these studies is constrained due to an incomplete comprehension of spasticity's underlying mechanisms, outdated research methods, and early limitations in implantable device technology. Intrathecal pumps for baclofen have remained as the mainstay for refractory spasticity, however, it comes with associated risks such as chemical dependence leading to acute baclofen withdrawal and requiring frequent refill requirement. Most importantly, it does not yield functional improvement of muscle activity, just suppression of spasticity. Botox is also routinely used but due to heterogeneity in muscle involvement as well as variability in provider skill, results may be inconsistent and short-lasting, requiring frequent clinic visits for repeat injections to the affected muscle groups. SCS may be able to address that gap in spasticity management.

Conditions

Chronic Pain; Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke; Upper Motor Neuron Lesion

Keywords

Spinal Cord Stimulation; Neuromodulation; Closed-loop SCS; Post-Stroke Pain; Spasticity; Chronic Pain; Functional Recovery

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_ONLY
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Interventional

Patients identified with post-stroke pain due to spasticity. Patients will be evaluated for spinal cord stimulation trial. The trial will be for 7 days.

Spinal Cord Stimulation- Closed loop

Intervention Type: DEVICE

This is a percutaneously placed epidural electrode that is connected to a battery-powered impulse generator for power. The electrical delivery is monitored in real-time with the measurement of evoked compound action potentials and adjusted to provide titration of therapeutic stimulation delivery.

Interventions

Spinal Cord Stimulation- Closed loop

This is a percutaneously placed epidural electrode that is connected to a battery-powered impulse generator for power. The electrical delivery is monitored in real-time with the measurement of evoked compound action potentials and adjusted to provide titration of therapeutic stimulation delivery.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

1. First-ever stroke

2. Aged 18 and older

3. Neuropathic pain >3 months (chronic)

4. Brain injury associated with spasticity in one or multiple limbs >3 months post-stroke

5. No previous history of neuropathic pain or spasticity in affected limbs

6. Cognitively capable to operate the SCS system

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inadequate Pain Severity: Patients with mild or non-debilitating pain may be excluded if the treatment is intended for individuals with moderate to severe pain.

2. Previous SCS Implantation: Patients who have previously undergone SCS implantation may be excluded to focus on those who are new to the therapy.

3. Inadequate Pain Duration: Some trials may exclude patients whose pain has not persisted for a minimum period to ensure that the pain condition is chronic.

4. Medical Comorbidities: Patients with certain medical conditions or comorbidities that may increase the risks associated with SCS, such as uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or active infections, may be excluded.

5. Psychological Factors: Patients with severe psychiatric disorders or psychological conditions that may interfere with the assessment of pain or the ability to provide informed consent may be excluded.

6. Allergies or Sensitivities: Patients with allergies to materials used in SCS devices or contraindications to the anesthesia used during implantation may be excluded.

7. Substance Abuse: Patients with active substance abuse or addiction issues may be excluded due to concerns about treatment compliance and efficacy.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Akhil Chhatre, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Countries

United States

References

Mayorova L, Radutnaya M, Varyukhina M, Vorobyev A, Zhdanov V, Petrova M, Grechko A. Immediate Effects of Anti-Spastic Epidural Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation on Functional Connectivity of the Central Motor System in Patients with Stroke- and Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Spasticity: A Pilot Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 14;11(8):2266. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082266.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 37626762 (View on PubMed)

Powell MP, Verma N, Sorensen E, Carranza E, Boos A, Fields DP, Roy S, Ensel S, Barra B, Balzer J, Goldsmith J, Friedlander RM, Wittenberg GF, Fisher LE, Krakauer JW, Gerszten PC, Pirondini E, Weber DJ, Capogrosso M. Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis. Nat Med. 2023 Mar;29(3):689-699. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02202-6. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 36807682 (View on PubMed)

Abstracts of Scientific Papers and Posters Presented at Physiatry '25: February 25 - March 1, 2025. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 1;104(6S Suppl 1):S1-S240. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002746. No abstract available.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 40421840 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

IRB00442113

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id