Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Real-World Evidence Study to Evaluate the Effects of Voltaren Use on Mobility and Quality of Life in Participants With Knee Osteoarthritis Pain (NCT NCT06379893)
NCT ID: NCT06379893
Last Updated: 2026-01-20
Results Overview
The average minutes of MVPA were measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to evaluate the effects of Voltaren Gel on physical activity. A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) was used to analyse the change from Baseline in MVPA average minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline average MVPA value from the average MVPA value at Week 1. Baseline value was calculated as the sum of minutes of MVPA over the Baseline period divided by duration of Baseline period, where Baseline period was the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement. Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, who used study product at least once and had data from at least one post Baseline quality of life (QoL) questionnaire to support at least one of the secondary endpoint assessments.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
196 participants
Baseline and Week 1
2026-01-20
Participant Flow
This study was conducted at 2 centers in the United States (US) and 6 centers in the European Union (EU) (Poland).
A total of 214 participants were screened during study of which 196 participants were enrolled and received Voltaren Gel. A total of 194 participants completed the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
196
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
194
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsors' decision
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Real-World Evidence Study to Evaluate the Effects of Voltaren Use on Mobility and Quality of Life in Participants With Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=196 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33 • n=37 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
118 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
78 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
188 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
19 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
|
157 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1Population: mITT Population. This study was designed as a single-arm real-world evidence (RWE) study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the three formulations within the population; therefore, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups") because there were no separate Arms/Groups in the study design.
The average minutes of MVPA were measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to evaluate the effects of Voltaren Gel on physical activity. A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) was used to analyse the change from Baseline in MVPA average minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline average MVPA value from the average MVPA value at Week 1. Baseline value was calculated as the sum of minutes of MVPA over the Baseline period divided by duration of Baseline period, where Baseline period was the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement. Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, who used study product at least once and had data from at least one post Baseline quality of life (QoL) questionnaire to support at least one of the secondary endpoint assessments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Minutes of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) at Week 1
Baseline
|
249.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 92.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Minutes of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) at Week 1
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
14.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 53.54
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2Population: mITT population. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the three formulations within the population; therefore, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups") because there were no separate Arms/Groups in the study design.
The average minutes of MVPA were measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to evaluate the effects of Voltaren Gel on physical activity. A MMRM was used to analyse the change from Baseline in MVPA average minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline average MVPA value from the average MVPA value at Week 2. Baseline value was calculated as sum of minutes of MVPA over the Baseline period divided by duration of Baseline period, where Baseline period was the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Minutes of MVPA at Week 2
Baseline
|
249.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 92.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Minutes of MVPA at Week 2
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
10.7 minutes
Standard Deviation 60.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3Population: mITT population. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the three formulations within the population; therefore, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups") because there were no separate Arms/Groups in the study design.
The average minutes of MVPA were measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to evaluate the effects of Voltaren Gel on physical activity. A MMRM was used to analyse the change from Baseline in MVPA average minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline average MVPA value from the average MVPA value at Week 3. Baseline value was calculated as sum of minutes of MVPA over the Baseline period divided by duration of Baseline period, where Baseline period was the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Minutes of MVPA at Week 3
Baseline
|
249.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 92.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Minutes of MVPA at Week 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-0.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 71.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT population. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the three formulations within the population; therefore, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups") because there were no separate Arms/Groups in the study design.
Daily average number of steps taken were measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to evaluate the effects of Voltaren Gel on functional mobility. MMRM was used to analyse the change from Baseline in daily average number of steps taken. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the average number of steps taken at Baseline from the average number of steps taken at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline value was calculated as the sum of steps taken over the Baseline period divided by duration of Baseline period, where Baseline period was the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Steps Taken at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
13826.5 steps
Standard Deviation 5076.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Steps Taken at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
602.3 steps
Standard Deviation 2930.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Steps Taken at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
323.1 steps
Standard Deviation 3515.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Steps Taken at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-57.1 steps
Standard Deviation 3826.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT population. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the three formulations within the population; therefore, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups") as there were no separate Arms in the study design.
Sedentary/non-sedentary time was measured using a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to evaluate the effects of Voltaren Gel on functional mobility. Ratio of sedentary/non-sedentary time was calculated as = Total number of minutes defined as sedentary behaviour divided by Total number of non-sedentary behaviour minutes where number of non-sedentary behaviour minutes in the day was derived as the sum of light activity and MVPA. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline ratio of sedentary/non-sedentary time from the ratio at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Sedentary/Non-sedentary Time at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
1.984 ratio
Standard Deviation 1.1595
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Sedentary/Non-sedentary Time at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-0.028 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5376
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Sedentary/Non-sedentary Time at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
0.003 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5571
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Sedentary/Non-sedentary Time at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
0.089 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6121
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT population. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the three formulations within the population; therefore, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups") because there were no separate Arms/Groups in the study design.
Gait was assessed through speed and step irregularity measured via cadence using a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants. Change from Baseline was calculated as by subtracting the average cadence at Baseline from the cadence at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Cadence at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
109.207 steps per minute
Standard Deviation 6.8045
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Cadence at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-0.149 steps per minute
Standard Deviation 6.3135
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Cadence at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-1.126 steps per minute
Standard Deviation 11.7981
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Cadence at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-1.751 steps per minute
Standard Deviation 14.7336
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT population. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population; So, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population (all groups) as there were no separate Arms in the study design.
Gait was assessed through speed and step irregularity measured via gait speed using a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the average gait speed at Baseline from the Average gait speed at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=177 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Gait Speed at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-0.007 meters per second
Standard Deviation 0.0809
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Gait Speed at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
1.010 meters per second
Standard Deviation 0.1385
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Gait Speed at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-0.016 meters per second
Standard Deviation 0.1069
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gait Assessed Through Speed and Step Irregularity Measured Via Gait Speed at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-0.016 meters per second
Standard Deviation 0.1401
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT population. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Indices of morning stiffness were assessed through levels of mobility 30 minutes post-wake. Functional mobility was measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants. Daily morning stiffness 30 minutes post-wake was defined as the total vector magnitude counts from Actigraph device 30 minutes post-wake. Change from Baseline was calculated as = (Average morning stiffness 30 minutes post-wake at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint minus Average Baseline morning stiffness 30 minutes post-wake). Baseline was defined as the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 30 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
75593.364 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 44958.5420
|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 30 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
1969.758 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 28283.0182
|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 30 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
2332.422 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 28420.8109
|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 30 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-1893.342 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 34458.1863
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Indices of morning stiffness were assessed through levels of mobility 60 minutes post-wake. Functional mobility was measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants. Daily morning stiffness 60 minutes post-wake was defined as the total vector magnitude counts from Actigraph device 60 minutes post-wake. Change from Baseline was calculated as = (Average morning stiffness 60 minutes post-wake at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint minus Average Baseline morning stiffness 30 minutes post-wake). Baseline was defined as the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 60 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
149034.401 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 86661.4977
|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 60 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
2891.276 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 45249.4973
|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 60 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
2438.403 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 48859.7477
|
|
Change From Baseline in Indices of Morning Stiffness Assessed Through Levels of Mobility 60 Minutes Post-wake at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-6734.944 vector magnitude counts
Standard Deviation 54957.9211
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT Population. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Participants completed the WOMAC questionnaire daily using eDiary. The WOMAC questionnaire consisted of 24 questions categorised in 3 subscales - Pain, Stiffness, Physical function. The physical function subscale consisted of 17 questions related to level of difficulty in performing functions, on average, during the last 48 hours scored on a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4, where score 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. Total WOMAC physical function subscale score was normalized on a 0 to 100 scale calculated as = (sum of raw score items)\*1.47. Higher scores indicated more difficulty in performing physical functions. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the normalized WOMAC subscale score at Baseline from the normalized WOMAC subscale score at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
48.702 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9284
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-8.677 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.6188
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-11.926 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.0764
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-15.644 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.9641
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 21Population: mITT population. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population; So, all participants were analyzed as a single group. The reported results apply to the entire study population (all groups) as there were no separate Arms in the study design.
The average minutes of MVPA on each day were measured through a connected activity tracker (Actigraph device) worn by the participants to assess the functional mobility. Baseline was calculated as the average of MVPA values collected during the Baseline period, where Baseline period was the number of non-missing days between Day -6 and Day 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=188 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 8
|
264.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 122.21
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 9
|
258.0 minutes
Standard Deviation 126.33
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Baseline
|
249.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 92.99
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 1
|
274.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 119.79
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 2
|
268.4 minutes
Standard Deviation 124.96
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 3
|
259.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 124.79
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 4
|
270.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 126.09
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 5
|
255.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 115.05
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 6
|
255.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 119.03
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 7
|
260.4 minutes
Standard Deviation 112.45
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 10
|
266.5 minutes
Standard Deviation 128.05
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 11
|
262.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 124.18
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 12
|
252.0 minutes
Standard Deviation 122.99
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 13
|
261.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 122.89
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 14
|
254.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 114.00
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 15
|
254.6 minutes
Standard Deviation 124.49
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 16
|
250.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 114.15
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 17
|
251.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 122.16
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 18
|
253.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 124.67
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 19
|
239.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 118.63
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 20
|
244.0 minutes
Standard Deviation 120.81
|
|
MVPA on Each Day of the Study
Day 21
|
107.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 85.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Physical function subscale score of the WOMAC questionnaire was used to study participant's perceived ability to exercise more regularly. It consisted of 17 questions related to the level of difficulty in performing functions, on average, during the last 48 hours scored on a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4, daily using eDiary where score 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. Total WOMAC physical function subscale score was normalized on a 0 to 100 scale calculated as = (sum of raw score items)\*1.47. Higher scores indicated more difficulty in performing physical functions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Week 1
|
40.375 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7527
|
|
WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Week 2
|
37.072 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.9130
|
|
WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Week 3
|
32.781 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.2916
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Participants rated the pain intensity experienced by them daily within the eDiary, using NRS. NRS is an 11-point scale with scores ranging from 0 to 10 where score 0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7 = severe pain, 8 to 9 = extreme pain, 10=pain as bad as it could be. Higher scores indicated greater pain intensity. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline NRS score from the NRS score at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Pain Intensity Assessed Through Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
5.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Pain Intensity Assessed Through Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Pain Intensity Assessed Through Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Pain Intensity Assessed Through Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Participants completed the WOMAC questionnaire daily. The WOMAC questionnaire consisted of 24 questions each scored on a 5-point scale: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. The WOMAC questionnaire was categorized in 3 subscales - Pain (5 questions, score ranges 0-20), Stiffness (2 questions, score ranges 0-8), Physical function (17 questions, score ranges 0-68). Each subscale score was normalized on a 0 to 100 scale calculated as: Pain subscale score= (sum of raw score items in dimension)\*5; Stiffness subscale score= (sum of raw score items in dimension)\*12.5; Physical function subscale score= (sum of raw score items in dimension)\*1.47. WOMAC Total score = sum of the 3 normalized WOMAC subscale scores. Thus, WOMAC total score ranges from 0 to 300 with 0 being the best and 300 being the worst. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Total Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
147.040 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.1349
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Total Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-27.359 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.7623
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Total Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-36.062 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 42.4964
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Total Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-47.852 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 49.4526
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
The pain subscale of the WOMAC questionnaire consisted of 5 questions related to severity of pain experienced by the participant when walking, stair climbing, at night, at rest, weightbearing, on average, during the last 48 hours. Participants scored the questions on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 daily using eDiary where score 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. The total pain subscale score was normalized on a 0 to 100 scale calculated as = (sum of raw score items in dimension)\*5. Higher scores indicated more pain. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline normalized WOMAC pain subscale score from the normalized score at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
48.196 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.2952
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-9.458 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.7044
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-12.422 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.5893
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-16.383 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.6274
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3Population: mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
The stiffness subscale of the WOMAC questionnaire consisted of 2 questions related to severity of stiffness experienced by the participant at morning and during the day, on average, during the last 48 hours. Participants scored the questions on a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4 daily using eDiary, where score 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme. The total stiffness subscale score for was normalized on a 0 to 100 scale calculated as = (sum of raw score items in dimension)\*12.5. Higher scores indicated more stiffness. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline normalized WOMAC stiffness subscale score from the normalized score at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Baseline
|
50.142 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.7965
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-9.242 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6173
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 2
|
-11.719 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.2063
|
|
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 1, 2 and 3
Change from Baseline at Week 3
|
-15.680 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6853
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 21Population: mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
KSS measured the subjective level of sleepiness/alertness during the day. Participants rated how sleepy or alert they were feeling using KSS with scores ranging from 1 to 9 where 1 = extremely alert, 2 = very alert, 3 = alert, 4 = fairly alert, 5 = neither alert nor sleepy, 6 = some signs of sleepiness, 7 = sleepy, but no efforts to keep alert, 8 = sleepy, some efforts to keep alert, 9 = very sleepy, great effort to keep alert, fighting sleep. Higher scores indicated greater sleepiness. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at each indicated post-Baseline timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=176 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep/Alertness Assessed Using Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) at Days 7, 14 and 21
Baseline
|
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep/Alertness Assessed Using Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) at Days 7, 14 and 21
Change from Baseline at Day 7
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep/Alertness Assessed Using Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) at Days 7, 14 and 21
Change from Baseline at Day 14
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep/Alertness Assessed Using Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) at Days 7, 14 and 21
Change from Baseline at Day 21
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 7, 14 and 21Population: mITT population. Here, overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses of this outcome measure. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-missing data at the indicated timepoint. This study was designed as a single-arm RWE study to evaluate the effectiveness of Voltaren gel. There was no intention to compare the effectiveness of the 3 formulations within the population. The reported results apply to the entire study population ("all groups").
Health-related QoL of participants was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. It consisted of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) with 5 response levels for each dimension where Level 1 = no problems, Level 2 = slight problems, Level 3 = moderate problems, Level 4 = severe problems, Level 5 = unable to perform activities/extreme problems. Participants were asked to indicate their health by ticking the box next to the most appropriate response level for each dimension. The response levels were used to derive a health index score based on the Crosswalk Value Set for the United States ranging from less than 0 (worst imaginable health) to 1 (best imaginable health) where higher scores indicated better health. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=174 Participants
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related QoL Assessed Using EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire at Days 7, 14, and 21
Baseline
|
0.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.124
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related QoL Assessed Using EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire at Days 7, 14, and 21
Change from Baseline at Day 7
|
0.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.098
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related QoL Assessed Using EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire at Days 7, 14, and 21
Change from Baseline at Day 14
|
0.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.097
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related QoL Assessed Using EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire at Days 7, 14, and 21
Change from Baseline at Day 21
|
0.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.111
|
Adverse Events
Voltaren Gel
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Voltaren Gel
n=196 participants at risk
Participants used Voltaren Gel containing diclofenac sodium, topically, applied daily as per label and leaflet instructions for up to 21 days. Participants were instructed to wear Actigraph device on the wrist as per label, leaflet or site-specific instructions post training throughout the day for up to 21 days.
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.1%
6/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.5%
3/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.51%
1/196 • From signing of informed consent form up to end of study (up to approximately 28 days)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study product including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device), whether or not considered related to the study product, including any washout or lead-in product (or medical device). A serious AE (SAE) was a particular category of an AE where the adverse outcome was serious.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee HALEON agreements may vary with individual investigators but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. HALEON supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER