ACL Reconstruction With Shark Screw® or Biocomposite-interference Screws
NCT ID: NCT06357091
Last Updated: 2026-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-16
2034-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
the investigators hope that with the human cortical bone screw the tunnel widening is reduced and the re-rupture rate is low
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interference Screw Mectascrew-C Postmarket Study
NCT05791656
Interference Screw Mectascrew-B Postmarket Study
NCT06166784
Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Joint, by the Method of Stabilization of the Screw With a Bioabsorbable Method, With or Without the Use of Autogenous Spongiform Bone Grafts.
NCT05328544
Biologic Augmentation With Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT04650568
Shark Screw® - Hand- and Foot Surgery Study
NCT04109469
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, the optimal technique for fixing the graft remains unclear. Until the replacement graft has healed, the suspension of the graft remains the weak point of the overall construct . The currently common procedures are fixation by means of interference screw in the bone tunnels and distal fixation using endobuttons. These fixation methods differ only insignificantly in clinical scores, stability, or failure rate .
A frequent complication after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is secondary tunnel dilatation, which has been described in up to 84% of cases. The cause of this is not yet fully understood. Nakazato et al. cites a longer graft and an increased dorsolateral tibial slope. Taketomi makes the posterior tibial slope particularly responsible for tibial tunnel widening and describes that an osteolysis process occurs due to the penetration of synovial fluid into the space between the tendon and the tunnel . Moon et al. see a negative correlation between the length of the graft insertion and tunnel dilation. The widening of the bone tunnels seem not to induce instability, but complicates a follow-up operation, e.g. a new cruciate ligament plasty in the event of rerupture following new trauma. The often up to twice as large bone tunnels make it difficult to find sufficient bone tissue to create a new tunnel. If the already existing and enlarged tunnel is reused, there is a risk of inadequate fixation and lack of incorporation of the new graft. In the revision, a two-stage procedure is often necessary, especially in the case of pronounced widening of the bone tunnel. The group postulates that with a tunnel width \>14 mm, only a two-stage procedure is possible. In a first operation, the bone tunnel must be filled with autologous or similar, and only in a second session a new reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament can be attempted.
the investigators are planning a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind and monocentric study with 2 parallel groups to investigate an alternative fixation method in cruciate ligament surgery. This involves a screw made from allogenic bone (Shark Screw ACL®; Surgebright GmbH, A-4040 Lichtenberg, Austria) in the form of an interference screw obtained from donor cortical bone. The insertion of this bone screw is identical to the usual interference screws. This type of osteosynthesis material has already proven in other forms in fracture treatment. The investigators have been using screws made from allogenic bone in a similar form for the treatment of scaphoid fractures for more than 4 years , Calcaneal fractures, corrective osteotomies, and arthrodesis with excellent success in everyday clinical practice. Treatment with an allogenic bone screw is compared with the current standard treatment with resorbable interference screw MectaScrew (composite), Medacta Int. Str. Regina 34, 6874 Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) in a control group. The aim is to include 80 patients who will be included in the study, i.e. 40 per group. Surgical method, treatment plan and follow up treatment do not differ.
The main objective of the planned study is to analyze the dilation of the bone tunnels in the two groups. This will be done by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) examinations (MRI preoperatively, postoperatively (within 3 days) and at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, CT postoperatively within 3 days and at 6 and 24 months after surgery). The bone tunnels are measured and the results of the two groups are compared to determine whether the allograft screw shows less bone tunnel dilation than the current standard treatment. An initial evaluation of the data and publication is planned after 12 months; the final evaluation and publication will take place after 24 months. The secondary objectives are to record the advantages and disadvantages of the allografts and to analyze their safety and effectiveness. In particular, the incorporation of the screws is to be assessed and classified. In order to better assess the outcome of the operation, clinical parameters will be recorded, and the two groups compared with each other. Furthermore, MRI will be analyzed for its informative value with regard to bone tunnel measurement.
The null hypothesis is that the two surgical procedures (bone screw / biocomposite screw) do not differ in outcome. The alternative hypothesis is that the use of the human, allogenic cortical bone screw as a fixation element for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in faster and, above all, better incorporation of the graft, with less widening of the bone tunnel. Based on the experience of the investigators with similar osteosynthesis material made from allogenic bone, it is to be expected that the bone tunnel will heal scare free. The investigators see the advantage of the proposed treatment particularly in its bone-sparing nature. It is to be expected that this will make possible revision easier and that a two-stage procedure will be necessary less often.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACL reconstruction with human allogeneic cortical bone screw (Shark Screw®)
The sugery techniqueis the same for both arms. An allograft screw (Shark Screw ACL®; Surgebright GmbH, A-4040 Lichtenberg, Austria) is used. At the beginning of the operation, the diagnosis is confirmed arthroscopically. The tendon is prepared. The bone tunnels will be created due to the size of the graft. The graft is pulled in and fixed with the intereference screw (Shark Screw ACL®). The tibial bone tunnel will be filled with cancellous chips. Finally, the graft is checked for strength and possible anterior or lateral pinching. The arthroscopic fluid is aspirated and the wound is closed.
ACL reconstruction with Shark Screw ACL®
ACL reconstruction with the Shark Screw ACL®, Investigation of tunnel widening
ACL reconstruction with Mecta Composite interference screw
The sugery techniqueis the same for both arms. A Mecta-composite-screw, (Medacta, Castello San Pietro, Swiss) is used. At the beginning of the operation, the diagnosis is confirmed arthroscopically. The tendon is prepared. The bone tunnels will be created due to the size of the graft. The graft is pulled in and fixed with the intereference screw (Mecta-composite-screw, Medacta). The tibial bone tunnel will be filled with cancellous chips. Finally, the graft is checked for strength and possible anterior or lateral pinching. The arthroscopic fluid is aspirated and the wound is closed.
ACL reconstruction with biocomposite screw (Mecta)
ACL reconstruction with biocomposite screw (Mecta), Investigation of tunnel widening
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ACL reconstruction with Shark Screw ACL®
ACL reconstruction with the Shark Screw ACL®, Investigation of tunnel widening
ACL reconstruction with biocomposite screw (Mecta)
ACL reconstruction with biocomposite screw (Mecta), Investigation of tunnel widening
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for replacement surgery
* Surgery within 6 months of injury
* Uninjured contralateral knee
Exclusion Criteria
* Primary bone disease
* inflammatory disease
* Unstable meniscus
* complete rupture of a collateral ligament
* early rerupture during the examination period (early rerupture)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexander Rofner-Moretti
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alexander Rofner-Moretti
Senior Physician Dr. med. Alexander Rofner-Moretti
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexander Rofner-Moretti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bezirkskrankenhaus Schwaz Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bezirkskrankenhaus Schwaz Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H
Schwaz, Tyrol, Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fahey M, Indelicato PA. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Am J Sports Med. 1994 May-Jun;22(3):410-4. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200318.
Linn RM, Fischer DA, Smith JP, Burstein DB, Quick DC. Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;21(6):825-31. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100611.
Hanslik-Schnabel B, Flory D, Borchert GH, Schanda JE. Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Using a Human Allogeneic Cortical Bone Screw. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022 Jul 29;7(3):24730114221112944. doi: 10.1177/24730114221112944. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Krasny C, Radda C, Polke R, Schallmayer D, Borchert GH, Albrecht C. A human, allogeneic cortical bone screw for distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) arthrodesis: a retrospective cohort study with at least 10 months follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4557-4564. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04785-2. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Sailer S, Lechner S, Flossmann A, Wanzel M, Habeler K, Krasny C, Borchert GH. Treatment of scaphoid fractures and pseudarthroses with the human allogeneic cortical bone screw. A multicentric retrospective study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Feb 10;24(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00686-7.
Pastl K, Schimetta W. The application of an allogeneic bone screw for osteosynthesis in hand and foot surgery: a case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2567-2575. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03880-6. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
Brcic I, Pastl K, Plank H, Igrec J, Schanda JE, Pastl E, Werner M. Incorporation of an Allogenic Cortical Bone Graft Following Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint in a Patient with Hallux Rigidus. Life (Basel). 2021 May 24;11(6):473. doi: 10.3390/life11060473.
Pastl K, Pastl E, Flory D, Borchert GH, Chraim M. Arthrodesis and Defect Bridging of the Upper Ankle Joint with Allograft Bone Chips and Allograft Cortical Bone Screws (Shark Screw(R)) after Removal of the Salto-Prosthesis in a Multimorbidity Patient: A Case Report. Life (Basel). 2022 Jul 11;12(7):1028. doi: 10.3390/life12071028.
Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, Coppola C, Eichinger M, Rudisch A, Kranewitter C, Attal R. ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1036-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05642-9. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Yumashev AV, Baltina TV, Babaskin DV. Outcomes after arthroscopic revision surgery for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):443-447. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1897744. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA. Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(2):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s001670100191.
Taketomi S, Inui H, Yamagami R, Nakazato K, Kawaguchi K, Kono K, Sameshima S, Kage T, Tanaka S. Lateral posterior tibial slope does not affect femoral but does affect tibial tunnel widening following anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone graft. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2022 Oct 5;30:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2022.09.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Fauno P, Kaalund S. Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2005 Nov;21(11):1337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.023.
Lee DK, Kim JH, Lee BH, Kim H, Jang MJ, Lee SS, Wang JH. Influence of Graft Bending Angle on Femoral Tunnel Widening After Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Transportal and Outside-In Techniques. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 22;9(10):23259671211035780. doi: 10.1177/23259671211035780. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Moon HS, Choi CH, Yoo JH, Jung M, Lee TH, Choi KH, Kim SH. The Graft Insertion Length in the Femoral Tunnel During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suspensory Fixation and Tibialis Anterior Allograft Does Not Affect Surgical Outcomes but Is Negatively Correlated With Tunnel Widening. Arthroscopy. 2021 Sep;37(9):2903-2914.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.072. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Nakazato K, Taketomi S, Inui H, Yamagami R, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S. Lateral posterior tibial slope and length of the tendon within the tibial tunnel are independent factors to predict tibial tunnel widening following anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3818-3824. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06419-1. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
Cavaignac E, Mesnier T, Marot V, Fernandez A, Faruch M, Berard E, Sonnery-Cottet B. Effect of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Incorporation. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Nov 30;8(11):2325967120960097. doi: 10.1177/2325967120960097. eCollection 2020 Nov.
de Beus A, Koch JE, Hirschmann A, Hirschmann MT. How to evaluate bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction - a critical review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017 Sep 18;7(2):230-239. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.2.230. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun.
Han DL, Nyland J, Kendzior M, Nawab A, Caborn DN. Intratunnel versus extratunnel fixation of hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct;28(10):1555-66. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 May 4.
Ilahi OA, Nolla JM, Ho DM. Intra-tunnel fixation versus extra-tunnel fixation of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2009 Apr;22(2):120-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247736.
Brand J Jr, Weiler A, Caborn DN, Brown CH Jr, Johnson DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;28(5):761-74. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280052501.
Hapa O, Barber FA. ACL fixation devices. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Dec;17(4):217-23. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181bf668c.
Anderson MJ, Browning WM 3rd, Urband CE, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ. A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 15;4(3):2325967116634074. doi: 10.1177/2325967116634074. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Rahr-Wagner L, Lind M. The Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:531-535. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S100670. eCollection 2016.
Filbay SR, Grindem H. Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;33(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: results can be obtained from principal investigator
results can be obtained from the principle investigator
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1097/2023 ACL-Shark Screw®
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.