Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-20
2023-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Investigation on Zirconia-ceramic Three-unit Bridges With CAD-on Veneering
NCT02175329
RCT: Titanium vs FCZ vs Zirconia Framework
NCT05296291
NobelProceraTM Bridge Shaded Zirconia
NCT02197312
Two-piece Zirconia Implants With Two Various Platforms
NCT06012071
Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses
NCT02220764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this prospective randomized double blinded clinical trial is to systematically evaluate and compare the long-term durability of monolithic zirconium dioxide and veneered zirconium dioxide based 3-, 4- or 5-unit bridges in the posterior dentition over time. The durability will be evaluated by recording technical and biological complications.
Background:
Fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) therapy is a common therapy. Usually the FDPs are made by combining a metal frame with a veneer to give the body a more tooth-like appearance, known as porcelain-fused-to-metal.
For 20 years we have used ceramic frames as an alternative to metal, since it has better biological and aesthetic properties. A common complication with these newer materials, however, is that the porcelain veneer debonds from the substructure, which sometimes leads to a need for remaking the FDP.
Zirconium dioxide or yttria stabilized tetragonal polycrystalline zirconium dioxide (Y-TZP), is an oxide ceramic with excellent characteristics such as high strength and biocompatibility. We currently use this ceramic routinely in dentistry for the production of both crowns and FDPs. It is now a well-documented and reliable material.
The monolithic restorations, that is Y-TZP without veneer, have been developed over the past few years. The former core materials in Y-TZP were opaque white-colored but have recently undergone development to become much more esthetic by increased translucency and improving staining techniques, without losing strength. By using only the strong oxide ceramic throughout we can obtain strong materials that have good biological properties, but without the risk of porcelain veneering fractures.
Laboratory studies evaluating crown therapy have shown very good results regarding these monolithic materials, but clinical trials on FDPs are missing. The long-term clinical studies on FDPs available concern veneered Y-TZP which have achieved acceptable results with good survival rate but with some complications in the form of veneer fractures. The veneering technique and materials for Y-TZP FDPs have since been developed to decrease the risk of chip-off fractures and recent publications show promising results. The aim of this study is therefore to compare survival and complications rates of Y-TZP FDPs with veneer and without veneer, monolithic, respectively.
Question:
The null hypothesis for this study is that monolithic Y-TZP based FDPs will perform equivalent to the veneered Y-TZP based FDPs when used for constructions in the posterior dentition.
Study population:
Patients for the study will be recruited within the daily dental care operations at clinics in Public and Private Dental Services.
Study method and randomization:
Included patients will undergo treatment in the form of preparation of the teeth and an impression taken for FDP therapy. The dentist does not know which of the two different FDP materials his patient will receive. The dental laboratory will receive a requisition from the dentist with a code number. This code number is randomized to one of the two materials to be investigated. Half of the patients will get a veneered zirconia based FDP while the other half receives a monolithic zirconia based. The finished FDP will then be cemented in the same way regardless of material. Method of treatment, FDP materials and cementation is performed according to a standardized protocol used routinely in dentistry.
Evaluation methods:
The evaluation is done by recording technical and biological complications. The examination is conducted by intraoral inspection and photo documentation and is performed by dentists not involved in the performed treatments.
Quality control and reporting:
Will be published in a scientific journal.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Veneered high-translucent zirconium dioxide fixed dental prosthesis
Core material: high translucent zirconium dioxide (BruxZir, Glidewell, Newport Beach, Canada) Buccal veneer: porcelain (GC initial Zr, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Fixed dental prosthesis
Fixed dentals prosthesis made out of high translucent zirconium dioxide with or without a porcelain veneer.
Monolithic high-translucent zirconium dioxide fixed dental prosthesis
High translucent zirconium dioxide (BruxZir, Glidewell, Newport Beach, Canada)
Fixed dental prosthesis
Fixed dentals prosthesis made out of high translucent zirconium dioxide with or without a porcelain veneer.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fixed dental prosthesis
Fixed dentals prosthesis made out of high translucent zirconium dioxide with or without a porcelain veneer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Malmö University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emma Gardell
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Malmo university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Malmo university
Malmo, Skåne County, Sweden
Malmo university
Malmo, Skåne County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014/11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.