CAR-T Cells in Systemic B Cell Mediated Autoimmune Disease
NCT ID: NCT06347718
Last Updated: 2025-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE1/PHASE2
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-17
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
BCMA-CD19 CAR-T Therapy for Refractory Autoimmune Diseases
NCT06794008
Safety and Efficacy of Metabolically Armed CD19 CAR-T Cells (Meta10-19) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Active SLE Clinical Research
NCT06711146
CAR-T Cells Therapy for Patients With Autoimmune Diseases
NCT07052565
Clinical Study on Targeted CD19/BCMA CAR-T Therapy for Autoimmune Diseases
NCT06775912
Clinical Study on Targeted CD19CAR-T Therapy for Autoimmune Diseases
NCT06549296
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
Evaluating the safety of CAR-T-Cells in systemic autoimmune diseases with 8 patients
Phase 2:
Evaluating the efficiency of CAR-T-Cells in systemic autoimmune diseases with 16 patients
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active dose
A prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single-dose interventional basket study.
Single intravenous infusion of a freshly prepared advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) from autologous and expanded T cells transduced ex vivo with a CD19-CAR construct.
No control intervention (e.g. another immunosuppressive therapy). Concomitant measures: Leukapheresis and lymphodepleting therapy for conditioning.
anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy
Single-dose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy
Single-dose
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form including written consent for data protection,
* Adults aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent,
* Adequate renal (eGFR \> 30 ml/min/m2), liver (no Child Pugh C), heart (at worst NYHA III, EF \> 30%) and pulmonary (FV and DLCO \> 30%) function,
* Male subjects unless surgically sterile, must agree to use two acceptable methods for contraception (e.g. spermicide and condom) during the trial and refrain from fathering a child starting from the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF) until 12 months after dosing of the IMP,
* Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and must agree to use a highly effective contraceptive method (Pearl in-dex \<1) starting from the time of signing the ICF and for 12 months after dosing of the IMP,
* Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements,
* Double vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-2 within the last 6 months.
* SLE specific:
* Fulfilling the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria of SLE,
* Positivity of anti-dsDNA (\> 4 U/l), anti-histone (+ or more), anti-nucleosome (+ or more) or anti-Sm antibodies (+ or more),
* Active disease at screening, defined as ≥ 1 organ system with a British Isles Lupus Assessment (BILAG) A score (severe disease activity) or ≥ 2 organ systems with a BILAG B score (moderate disease activity),
* Insufficient response or intolerance/ contraindication to glucocorticoids and to at least 2 of the following treatments: hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, belimumab, methotrexate, rituximab, cyclophosphamide. Insufficient response is defined as having increased disease activity based on the definition explained in the previous bullet point.
* SSc specific:
* Fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria of SSc),
* Positivity (+ or more) for at least one SSc-specific parameter (Scl70, RNA polymerase, Th/To, RP11/12, U3RNP autoantibodies),
* Signs for fast progression including (i) disease duration ≤ 5 years (from onset of first non-Raynaud manifestation), (ii) mRSS score 10-35 at screening, (iii) elevated acute phase reactant levels (CRP ≥ 6 mg/L, ESR ≥ 28mm/h or platelet count ≥ 330 G/L), (iii) mRSS increase ≥ 3 units or involvement of one new body area or mRSS increase ≥ 2 units in one body area or ≥ 1 tendon friction rub over 6 months,
* Insufficient response or intolerance/ contraindication to at least 2 of the following treatments: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, nintedanib, methotrexate, rituximab. Insufficient response is defined as having increased disease activity based on the definition explained in the previous bullet point.
* DM/PM specific:
* Fulfilling the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for probable or definite DM or PM,
* Presence of active myositis in muscle biopsy or muscle MRI and/or signs of interstitial lung disease related to DM/PM,
* Positivity (+ or more) for at least one myositis-specific antibody (aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, Mi2, MDA5, SAE, SRP, ARS, HMGCR, MJ, TIF1gamma),
* Muscle weakness as define by MMT \< 142 and 2 of the following criteria: VAS patients Global ≥2cm, VAS physician Global ≥ 2cm, HAQ \> 0.25, at least one muscle enzyme \> 1.3 times upper limit of normal, VAS global extra muscular activity ≥ 2cm,
* Insufficient response or intolerance/ contraindication to glucocorticoids and to at least 2 of the following treatments: mycophenolate mofetil, ciclosporin A, tacrolimus, methotrexate, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins. Insufficient response is defined as having increased disease activity based on the definition explained in the previous bullet point.
Exclusion Criteria
* ANC \< 1.000/mm3, ALC \< 500/mm3 or hemoglobin \< 8g/dl, absolute CD3+ T cell count \< 100/μl,
* Uncontrolled severe concomitant disease, such as cancer (except basal or squamous cell skin cancer) and diabetes mellitus,
* Severely impaired renal (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min/m2), liver (Child Pugh C), heart (NYHA IV, EF ≤ 30%) and pulmonary (FV and DLCO ≤ 30%) function,
* Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if the subject were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study,
* Prior treatment with anti-CD19 antibody therapy, adoptive T cell therapy or any prior gene therapy product (e.g. CAR T cell therapy),
* History of bone marrow/ hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation,
* Any concomitant severe active infection, e.g. HIV, hepatitis B or C, SARS-CoV 2 (COVID 19), or active tuberculosis as defined by a positive Quantiferon TB-test. If presence of latent tuberculosis is established then treatment according to local guidelines must have been initiated prior to enrollment,
* Diagnosis of severe neuropsychiatric SLE, inclusion body myositis or limited SSc,
* Pregnant or lactating females,
* Females who are intending to conceive during the study,
* Known hypersensitivity to any drug components,
* Malignancy in the last 5 years before screening,
* Requirement for immunization with live vaccine during the study period or within 14 days preceding leukapheresis,
* Subjects who are younger than 18 years or are incapable to understand the aim, importance and consequences of the study and to give legal informed consent,
* Have a history of alcohol or substance abuse within the preceding 6 months that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may increase the risks associated with study participation or study agent administration, or may interfere with interpretation of results,
* Subjects who possibly are dependent on the Sponsor, the Principal Investigator or other Investigators (e.g. family members).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Georg Schett, Prof. Dr. med. univ.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Georg Schett, Prof. Dr.
Role: primary
Daniela Bohr, Dr.
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-001366-35
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DRKS00032279
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CASTLE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.